It is a bit weird how Pulju's tools got rated so highly.
Stickhandling has always been poor(Some scouts actually praised it, so odd...), he's had questionable decision making and his passing hasn't been very consistent. His shot is powerful but the accuracy's never been anything to write home about and his release hasn't been super fast or deceptive or anything. His "physical capabilities" got praised a lot like his strength, fitness, skating, effort etc. but isn't it odd how little pure skill would be valued with Puljujärvi? Is being big and fit really what you'd primarily look for in a top pick?
Well i would say it was easy to see why people were so high on him, as he does have all kinds of tools. He's shown the ability to stickhandle and dazzle with nice moves, he's shown a good shot, particularly slapper, he's shown to be able to make some high-end passes, he's got the size, had the speed etc. It's easy to think what this kid could do if he puts it all together.
But in saying that, he never showed consistency. It's amazing how the kid can fire a lazer and then you don't see that type of shot for the next dozen games, how he can dish and then can't even make tape to tape passes the next game, stickhandle in a phone booth and then completely fumble the puck in the next couple games.
You can understand inconsistency in terms of overall game or compete level from game to game basis for a young player, heck even some older players have that issue, but when it comes down to inconsistencies in basic skills, it's not often you see that and to me was always a red flag, and it still is. When you look at the high-end offensive players in the game, they all have a skill or two they excel at, and you can always count on those skills showing on the ice, regardless of if they have ordinary game or a good game.
And he does lack some level of creativity, as well as hockey IQ. Basically the WJC's was Pulju in a nutshell. He showed all kinds of stuff during that tournament, but ultimately it was Aho and Laine that often finished a play or made that creative next level play that led to a goal. Pulju contributed to everything, but i don't remember too many goals that i'd remember saying Pulju was the reason that went in the net. I would say the biggest reason Pulju was so good was that he competed the hardest he ever has over 7 games. You could see the potential as a big, speedy, buzzsaw type of winger who can do a bit of everything INSTEAD of the high-end skill player who produces big numbers. That's why i always leaned towards 60 point future, than say, PPG.
In saying all of this, to not sound too negative, i still stand by my statement that if (and hopefully when) Pulju is ready to make the jump, he's going to be able to make an impact right away. His tools give him that advantage. But first he just has to get there and put in the work.
With Pulju making the NHL will be the biggest hurdle he's ever going to have to jump over. Once he does that, he's going to be a good player right away. Thus, patience is the key.
Biggest issue with him is between the ears. Just need to wait for him to mature and start seeing things in a different light, and for the Oilers sake you hope it doesn't take too many years.