DoingItCoolKiwi
Registered User
- May 23, 2017
- 3,418
- 2,639
5 points in 5 games. slowly busting?
Give him time. The 2nd half of the season will be the one that should be looked at more seriously
5 points in 5 games. slowly busting?
PPG as a rookie in a new league hardly seems like "busting".5 points in 5 games. slowly busting?
He's got an agenda. Don't bother.PPG as a rookie in a new league hardly seems like "busting".
I'm fairly certain he will break out and be quite dominant soon.
To play in the best league in the world, you need to be the best payer you can possibly be, and the MHL-KHL system has a track record of developing Russian stars that absolutely dwarves the CHL. It's not even comparable, honestly, we have been discussing this phenomenon for years now. Ice size is a relatively minor issue, you don't need to play in NA junior leagues and minors for 4 years to prepare for that, especially as we rarely see truly big ice players among young Russians now.True but who wants to play in Russia for their entire career when a better league exists here? Eventually they have to make the jump if they want to play in the best league in the world. it's not like playing in Russia for an extra 4 years prepares them for the change in ice size.
It's interesting to think whether top prospects in general, not just Russians, would benefit more from playing professional hockey instead of junior like European prospects tend to do.To play in the best league in the world, you need to be the best payer you can possibly be, and the MHL-KHL system has a track record of developing Russian stars that absolutely dwarves the CHL. It's not even comparable, honestly, we have been discussing this phenomenon for years now. Ice size is a relatively minor issue, you don't need to play in NA junior leagues and minors for 4 years to prepare for that, especially as we rarely see truly big ice players among young Russians now.
To play in the best league in the world, you need to be the best payer you can possibly be, and the MHL-KHL system has a track record of developing Russian stars that absolutely dwarves the CHL. It's not even comparable, honestly, we have been discussing this phenomenon for years now. Ice size is a relatively minor issue, you don't need to play in NA junior leagues and minors for 4 years to prepare for that, especially as we rarely see truly big ice players among young Russians now.
It's interesting to think whether top prospects in general, not just Russians, would benefit more from playing professional hockey instead of junior like European prospects tend to do.
Matthews certainly seemed to have benefitted from playing pro before his NHL debut. Regardless of ice surface, playing in a league where you score two points per game doesn't sound like a good development towards being an NHL player at all.
It shouldn't be that way though. I refuse to accept that Russians are just completely inept at adapting to the outside world before they hit their early 20's. It makes absolutely no sense. Why would Russians be the black sheep of all the Euros?
Keep in mind that North America and Western Europe are relatively similar, the transition isn't drastic for most kids. Russia, on the other hand, is an entirely different animal.
Think about it this way. How many Canadian kids would stunt their development if they, at the tender age of 15-19, were dropped into the middle of Russia to develop (even if their objective was to play KHL). Yea, it would be a disaster for most of those kids too.
It's impossible to know really. We've never tried it.
No, it's not impossible to know.
It should be painfully obvious to any worldly individual that most 15-19 year old Canadians would have big time difficulty in Russia as compared to Western Europe; and I'm not even talking about hockey players. Like I said, it's an entirely different world. With that in mind, and on top of that, hockey players would have the added responsibility of developing their game in such a scenario. It's a recipe for disaster.
It's no wonder most Russians regress in the CHL when compared to their Euro or North American counterparts. And it has nothing to do with the CHL development system, or Russians not being 'good enough', or 'poor adapters'.
Sergachev and Provorov seem to have adjusted fine. Some kids just aren't cut out for moving half way across the world but obviously others have no issues with it.
People still don't want to understand that the problem is if a Russian kid leaves around age 17 they haven't mastered the Russian hockey style. They then have to learn the Canadian style at an older age. The end result is they are a flawed player. A player either needs to come over much earlier or later.
Svechnikov is extremely high risk because of this. A team drafting him high is basically taking the big risk that hes the rare guy that is so talented he can overcome this and become an all star level player. His brother clearly has fallen in this trap but few want to admit it because of just wishful thinking.
This is actually a bit of a myth that got trumpeted last year with Hischier's slow start and his extremely hot middle of the season, only to slow down again at the end of the year.Rookie imports usually start slow. Look at his season in sets of 20. Each set should be more statistically impressive than the previous set.
Also, look at him relative to his teammates. The only guy with more points is in his third season with the team.
Not the flashiest of hat tricks, but it should give him a boost of confidence