I wasn't referring to production per se. It's that we already have an offensively talented player who doesn't fit well into a defensive system, so why give up assets to get another one? Trade for a problem....There’s a pretty good gap between JHS and Gusev.
I have one in my garage. I'll lend it to you.The hole just keeps getting deeper. *goes to look for a ladder*
Agreed. He's tempting, but we have an age and albatross issue, and he only exasperates it.6 more seasons of a 9.5mil cap hit for a guy already trending downward? Mehhhhh. I pass.
I agree with most of your post, but I don't agree with this part. It seems like the TDL is when you get vets on expiring contracts, not prime players who are locked up.Best bet finding these guys is probably at TDL
The comment I responded to was the isles did not make a move because they need to pay Dobson &Wally down the road.Not for them. For Toews, Pulock, and Barzal in July.
Lou knows we need a sniper so he tried for Panarin, just as he looked into Mark Stone last February. But he's not interested in bringing in another middle 6 forward who might make us only slightly better because "he's better than Leo or Kuhnhackl". Not unless he can rid us of one of the anchor contracts that we're saddled with.
With last season's success Lou now has the luxury of letting Wahlstrom and Dobson ease their way in as well as letting Nelson, Barzal, and a revamped power play supply the offense rather than going outside the organization for it, unless it's an elite sniper.
The comment you responded to referenced paying the current RFAs and potentially blocking the path to the NHL for Dobson/Wahlstrom by adding bodies that take their potential spots. Nothing to do with not paying Panarin in order to pay Dobson and Wahlstrom who are already locked up on ELCsThe comment I responded to was the isles did not make a move because they need to pay Dobson &Wally down the road.
This comment ignores that the isles recently tried giving Panarin a huge,long-term deal.
While I agree that the isles should not over pay for someone slightly better than Leo or Kuhnhack, I gotta disagree that their strategy has been " don't spend on a top 6 upgrade because Dobson & Wally have future big contracts coming up"
Yeah, didn't word it quite right.I agree with most of your post, but I don't agree with this part. It seems like the TDL is when you get vets on expiring contracts, not prime players who are locked up.
The comment I responded to was the isles did not make a move because they need to pay Dobson &Wally down the road.
This comment ignores that the isles recently tried giving Panarin a huge,long-term deal.
While I agree that the isles should not over pay for someone slightly better than Leo or Kuhnhack, I gotta disagree that their strategy has been " don't spend on a top 6 upgrade because Dobson & Wally have future big contracts coming up"
Yeah, interesting.I think they are running out of patience with Brassard, otherwise why move him to the wing when he's above 50% on faceoffs?
Paying Dobson & Wally raises was part of the excuse given for not making a move.The comment you responded to referenced paying the current RFAs and potentially blocking the path to the NHL for Dobson/Wahlstrom by adding bodies that take their potential spots. Nothing to do with not paying Panarin in order to pay Dobson and Wahlstrom who are already locked up on ELCs
I think they are running out of patience with Brassard, otherwise why move him to the wing when he's above 50% on faceoffs?
Panarin would've been signed before Lee, so you'd have to take into account the fact that Lee either wouldn't have been signed or could've been signed for less.
But the isles did not pass on Stone and Panarin because of their salaries. Lou tried and failed to acquire them.
Tnat is hardly the same as the isles not even trying because those kids in juniors and college will need raises down the road or will be blocked down the road.
I know Lee says that he would have been an Islander no matter what but that simply doesn't hold water when you look at our cap. There's just no way we could have fit him in (more for long term) at his current salary, or even close to it. Which was why I would have much preferred signing Lee over Eberle. We probably would have gotten him for a little less than what we ultimately did and we could have made Eberle the July 1st fall back for when we didn't sign Panarin. Ultimately it would have gotten us to the same spot but this team is much better off with Lee/Panarin than Eberle/Panarin - at least IMO. I always viewed Panarin as an upgrade to Eberle. Lee is a different type of player, completely, and shouldn't have been the trade off, which is what he ultimately would have become, statements after signing not withstanding.Panarin would've been signed before Lee, so you'd have to take into account the fact that Lee either wouldn't have been signed or could've been signed for less.
I know Lee says that he would have been an Islander no matter what but that simply doesn't hold water when you look at our cap. There's just no way we could have fit him in (more for long term) at his current salary, or even close to it. Which was why I would have much preferred signing Lee over Eberle. We probably would have gotten him for a little less than what we ultimately did and we could have made Eberle the July 1st fall back for when we didn't sign Panarin. Ultimately it would have gotten us to the same spot but this team is much better off with Lee/Panarin than Eberle/Panarin - at least IMO. I always viewed Panarin as an upgrade to Eberle. Lee is a different type of player, completely, and shouldn't have been the trade off, which is what he ultimately would have become, statements after signing not withstanding.
No, but not trying now, after Lee was re-signed, is a lot different than before is all I'm saying. I don't agree that Lamoriello won't make a move because of salary cap implications. I think he won't make a move unless it's the right/perfect move because of salary cap implications.
Well, of course. That's because there's a nuanced hierarchy of priorities. So, signing Panarin would have necessitated an adjustment to the hierarchy and the interest in signing him demonstrates a willingness to do so based on that particular player in relation to other priorities (signing younger players down the road).
That doesn't mean it's an absolute and constitutes a binary in which either a) Lou wants to sign the young players or b) Lou doesn't care about that at all and wants to sign veterans. Do people really think like this?
So what happened to the other one?
Who made that comment?The comment I responded to was the isles did not make a move because they need to pay Dobson &Wally down the road.
So what happened to the other one?
How appropriate. There are some folks here who should join her.She went down the garbage chute.