Except last game we had Dano-Petan-Armia as our 4th line which hardly fits your definition. Most teams have a pretty uneven split. IMO at least you need to have enough talent throughout the lineup to even out the ice time and most teams don't. And I just don't see it with the Jets. Most people still seem pretty high on our bottom 6 and lay it on usage, but at some point don't they at least have to have a sniff of production without being carried by better players?
That sounds good but not necessarily. Draisaitl is carried by a better player but it is a good combination. If Wheeler carries Petan but both achieve when paired then it doesn't matter which player is the carrier and which is carried. For the umpteenth time - Petan produces when put with skilled players and importantly, those players produce more with him. Or at least that is how it appears from the very limited sample that we have.
He scored 1 goal last year and 4 assists playing 5 on 5 last year. No points of any kind this year. I like Petan but saying he's produced is a bit of a stretch IMO
I'd like to see Petan between Laine and Ehlers for a good 5 games to see what they got. It helps distribute the wealth too.
If only there'd been some chance to try things out last season...some set of ultimately meaningless games where the goal would be experimentation and seeing what might work. OH WELL...I'd give Petan an honest 5 games and if he can't keep up, down he goes. We would look better with 3 good centers instead of the 2 and the rest of our "centers".
I'd give Petan an honest 5 games and if he can't keep up, down he goes. We would look better with 3 good centers instead of the 2 and the rest of our "centers".
Why not run something like...
Ehlers Schiefele Laine
Connor Little Armia
Lemieux Petan Wheeler
Mattias Copp Dano/Tanev
I mean... You spread out the ability to control the play. Petan and Wheeler played well together last season. Wheeler would still be around 18 mins a game... Seems like a nice brainer.
Armia plays a similar game to little as they put pucks into the same areas and are able to play hard on the wall.
You would get more 5v5 out of Armia and Petan that way
I'd like to see Petan between Laine and Ehlers for a good 5 games to see what they got. It helps distribute the wealth too.
So how does MP-Petan-Wheeler make sense as a line? Both MP and Wheeler generate much more assists then goals and we then play them with a center who has 3 goals in 85 NHL games? On that line Wheeler is the go to trigger man. Not really his strong suit. Even as a RW with 2 left handed shots.Worth considering. Looks strange to see Wheeler on the 3rd line and Armia on the 2nd but maybe that is just getting too hung up on those labels.
That is the kind of thing that should have been tried in TC but with the way they are playing I think it would be worth a shot in season.
When healthy MP pushes Lemieux out and Lowry pushes Copp to LW and Matthias to the PB.
Ehlers Schiefele Laine
Connor Little Armia
Perreault Petan Wheeler
Copp Lowry Dano/Tanev
Matthias Hendricks
There is such an easy fix to the ice-time distribution...
Move Perreault to the 3rd line (Connor in the top-6).
That also gives a bit more depth onto the 4th line.
Jets will probably start to use the top-6 less once they get into a much busier part of their schedule. At this point, they can run their top-6 more because they have long stretches between games.
Worth considering. Looks strange to see Wheeler on the 3rd line and Armia on the 2nd but maybe that is just getting too hung up on those labels.
That is the kind of thing that should have been tried in TC but with the way they are playing I think it would be worth a shot in season.
When healthy MP pushes Lemieux out and Lowry pushes Copp to LW and Matthias to the PB.
Ehlers Schiefele Laine
Connor Little Armia
Perreault Petan Wheeler
Copp Lowry Dano/Tanev
Matthias Hendricks
So how does MP-Petan-Wheeler make sense as a line? Both MP and Wheeler generate much more assists then goals and we then play them with a center who has 3 goals in 85 NHL games? On that line Wheeler is the go to trigger man. Not really his strong suit. Even as a RW with 2 left handed shots.
I think we have had this discussion a couple times? I'm not as big of fan of our bottom 6 as many around here. I see a big hole at the #3 center spot that keeps us from potentially running 3 scoring lines. With Connor coming up with more jump in his game and looking as good as he did, he likely doesn't go back when MP is healthy so that now gives us 2/3 of a 3rd scoring line (MP & Armia). I just don't think Petan or Copp will ever effectively step into that #3 center role. IMO you would have seen improved games and more signs of that by now despite whatever type of usage they get. Maybe you roll the dice on Roslovic being ready? I just keep imagining this team with 1 more good center to slot between Little and Lowry. Now imagine a center that could slot between Scheifele and Little and how dominant we could be?Well its not my idea but do you like the way they have played? Should we try more of the same or should we try something truly different? Should we continue to be a 2 line team or should we try for 3 or 4?
I think we have had this discussion a couple times? I'm not as big of fan of our bottom 6 as many around here. I see a big hole at the #3 center spot that keeps us from potentially running 3 scoring lines. With Connor coming up with more jump in his game and looking as good as he did, he likely doesn't go back when MP is healthy so that now gives us 2/3 of a 3rd scoring line (MP & Armia). I just don't think Petan or Copp will ever effectively step into that #3 center role. IMO you would have seen improved games and more signs of that by now despite whatever type of usage they get. Maybe you roll the dice on Roslovic being ready? I just keep imagining this team with 1 more good center to slot between Little and Lowry. Now imagine a center that could slot between Scheifele and Little and how dominant we could be?