Research Thread for NHL Award and All-star Voting

[Pwnasaurus]

It's no worries - I just found the irony amusing.

Indeed, the ironing is delicious.

 

[FissionFire]

It's no worries - I just found the irony amusing.

Bottom line - Brodeur boosters can always find their own arguments, and Roy boosters can always find their own arguments. And then there are Hasek boosters.

Because of my background, I try to stay as neutral as I can, but given my location (and the fact that I've coached the son of one of the three - yes, the one who had a tizzy this year ) it's hard for me to stay neutral.

Ah hah! Now we know who to blame! It's all your fault!

 

[Bear of Bad News]

Ah hah! Now we know who to blame! It's all your fault!

Hey, he was normal when I was done with him. On the other hand, he's a goalie, so he was probably never completely normal.

 

[seventieslord]

Brodeur boosters try to come up with arguments about how he's better than Roy or Hasek, but these weak and insignificant arguments are easily swatted aside by those of us who have taken the time to study the facts available.

 

[Hockey Outsider]

It's well known that Mark Messier narrowly beat Ray Bourque for the Hart trophy in 1990 by a narrow margin (227 vs 225 voting point). I've finally found a published source that suggests "suspicious" voting:

"Messier nosed out Boston Bruins defenseman Ray Bourque in the closest vote in history for the award... Surprisingly, six hockey writers left Bourque off their ballots, which made the difference in the voting... "That's a joke", Mike Milbury said. "They'll have to do something about the system"."

This doesn't tell us anything new, but it's good to have a source for this controversial vote.

Source: Globe & Mail, Thursday June 7, 1990, page A20 (spots), article "Messier just edges Bourque for Hart" by David Shoalts

 

[Dark Shadows]

It's well known that Mark Messier narrowly beat Ray Bourque for the Hart trophy in 1990 by a narrow margin (227 vs 225 voting point). I've finally found a published source that suggests "suspicious" voting:

"Messier nosed out Boston Bruins defenseman Ray Bourque in the closest vote in history for the award... Surprisingly, six hockey writers left Bourque off their ballots, which made the difference in the voting... "That's a joke", Mike Milbury said. "They'll have to do something about the system"."

This doesn't tell us anything new, but it's good to have a source for this controversial vote.

Source: Globe & Mail, Thursday June 7, 1990, page A20 (spots), article "Messier just edges Bourque for Hart" by David Shoalts

Is this from a Library? Or do you have a link for it?

There used to be 3 Newspaper archived quotes available, but they have all since become defunct.

The articles I read claim only 3 writers left him off the ballot, but all 3 were Edmonton writers. Or maybe it meant the 3 most suspicious. Its been a long time since I read it.

 

[Hockey Outsider]

Is this from a Library? Or do you have a link for it?

There used to be 3 Newspaper archived quotes available, but they have all since become defunct.

The articles I read claim only 3 writers left him off the ballot, but all 3 were Edmonton writers. Or maybe it meant the 3 most suspicious. Its been a long time since I read it.

I only have access to the Globe through my online alumni account so unfortunately a direct link won't work.

Unfortunately there were no details about which writers excluded Bourque. (There were also rumours that several Montreal writers left Iginla off the ballot in 2002, when a single vote would have given Iginla the Hart). But how do people know which voters excluded which players? I thought the ballots were anonymous (and it seems unlikely that an Edmonton/Montreal writer would start bragging that they didn't vote in good faith simply to give their city's player the trophy).

 

[Weztex]

That's it for now. I'm stopping here because the NHL Awards media guide has (at least partial) voting results for the all-star teams from 1947-present.

I thought all-star teams 47-67 weren't available since nobody listed them on this page. I'm happy to see it's not the case. It would be incredibly great if somebody owning the guide took the time to fill in some of the blanks in the threads. I'll go and see if I can have access to this and contribute a little.

 

[seventieslord]

All that media guide has is the voting points received by the first and second all-star team member, unfortunately.

 

[seventieslord]

I'm still interested in going back to the 1976 and 1974 papers to try to get the all-star voting for those years just to fill in the gap and to be able to say we have complete data for 40 years. Then, work my way back from 1967 and onwards. Unfortunately, the Regina Public Library doesn't have Globe and Mail microfiche going back nearly as far as I thought they would.

 

[Weztex]

All that media guide has is the voting points received by the first and second all-star team member, unfortunately.

That's exactly a big part of what I'm looking for. Especially for goalies pre-70. I went to a local sport and memorabilia store today and they didn't have it.

The least info we can find should be posted in this thread. That's an incredible point of reference.

 

[seventieslord]

That's exactly a big part of what I'm looking for. Especially for goalies pre-70. I went to a local sport and memorabilia store today and they didn't have it.

The least info we can find should be posted in this thread. That's an incredible point of reference.

All that is going to show is the margin of victory between first and second. What I really like to know is who was 3rd, 4th, etc.

 

[Weztex]

All that is going to show is the margin of victory between first and second. What I really like to know is who was 3rd, 4th, etc.

No matter what you would like to know, this thread is called NHL Award and All-star Voting. I'm as much interested as you in 3rd, 4th places and so on but those informations are not available. The thing is, all available data, useful or not to me, you or even bilros, should be posted here so we won't have to dig it up every time like I just did :

NHL all star teams voting for goalies. (originally posted by BM67)

50-51
Terry Sawchuk, Det 70 (10-6-2)
Chuck Rayner, NYR 40 (5-3-6)

51-52
Terry Sawchuk, Det 90 (18-0-0)
Jim Henry, Bos 23 (0-7-2)

52-53
Terry Sawchuk, Det 69 (10-6-1)
Gerry McNeil, Mtl 57 (8-5-2)

53-54
Harry Lumley, Tor 127
Terry Sawchuk, Det 95

54-55
Harry Lumley, Tor 152
Terry Sawchuk, Det 128

55-56
Jacques Plante, Mtl 119
Glenn Hall, Det 84

56-57
Glenn Hall, Det 121
Jacques Plante, Mtl 85

57-58
Glenn Hall, Chi 108
Jacques Plante, Mtl 104

58-59
Jacques Plante, Mtl 145
Terry Sawchuk, Det 98

59-60
Glenn Hall, Chi 106 (22-84)
Jacques Plante, Mtl 105 (68-37)

60-61
Johnny Bower, Tor 156 (84-72)
Glenn Hall, Chi 113

61-62
Jacques Plante, Mtl 157
Glenn Hall, Chi 86

62-63
Glenn Hall, Chi 142
Terry Sawchuk, Det 76

63-64
Glenn Hall, Chi 132 (88-44)
Charlie Hodge, Mtl 97 (23-74)

64-65
Roger Crozier, Det 157 (67-90)
Charlie Hodge, Mtl 79 (72-7)

65-66
Glenn Hall, Chi 144 (84-60)
Gump Worsley, Mtl 85 (18-67)

66-67
Ed Giacomin, NYR 149 (90-59)
Glenn Hall, Chi 62 (27-35)

67-68
Gump Worsley, Mtl 55 (24-31)
Ed Giacomin, NYR 41 (5-36)
Glenn Hall, St L 4th 24 (11-13)
Terry Sawchuk, LA T11th 2 (0-2)

68-69
Glenn Hall, St L 115
Ed Giacomin, NYR 102
Jacques Plante, St L 3rd 61

69-70
Tony Esposito, Chi 180
Ed Giacomin, NYR 81
Jacques Plante, St L 3rd 28

70-71
Ed Giacomin, NYR 157
Jacques Plante, Tor 111
Glenn Hall, St L T6th 1

Those number are really great to fuel the Plante/Hall/Sawchuk. Shows that despite Hall's 1st all star team domination, Plante was sometimes tailing him VERY closely. He may have been robbed the 1960 1st all star berth. Probably a love or hate thing going on. Shows that margin of victory can be a much useful information.

 

[Hockey Outsider]

Norris Trophy Voting

Year|Player|Votes|Max|Percentage|Notes
1954 | Red Kelly | 162 | 180 | 90%
1954 | Doug Harvey | 57 | 180 | 31.7%
1954 | Bill Gadsby | 38 | 180 | 21.1%
1955 | Doug Harvey | 147 | 180 | 81.7%
1955 | Red Kelly | 95 | 180 | 52.8%
1955 | Fern Flaman | 32 | 180 | 17.8%
1955 | Bob Goldham | 16 | 180 | 8.9%
1955 | Hugh Bolton | 9 | 180 | 5%
1956 | Doug Harvey | 156 | 180 | 86.7%
1956 | Bill Gadsby | 59 | 180 | 32.8%
1956 | Red Kelly | 44 | 180 | 24.4%
1956 | Tom Johnson | 21 | 180 | 11.7%
1956 | Fern Flaman | 11 | 180 | 6.1%
1956 | Harry Howell | 8 | 180 | 4.4%
1956 | Frank Martin | 7 | 180 | 3.9%
1956 | Allan Stanley | 5 | 180 | 2.8%
1956 | Bob Goldham | 3 | 180 | 1.7%
1956 | Dollard St. Laurent | 3 | 180 | 1.7%
1956 | Hugh Bolton | 3 | 180 | 1.7%
1956 | Jimmy Morrison | 2 | 180 | 1.1%
1956 | Lee Fogolin | 2 | 180 | 1.1%
1957 | Doug Harvey | 159 | 180 | 88.3%
1957 | Red Kelly | 42 | 180 | 23.3%
1957 | Bill Gadsby | 32 | 180 | 17.8%
1957 | Fern Flaman | 32 | 180 | 17.8%
1957 | Doug Mohns | 23 | 180 | 12.8%
1958 | Doug Harvey | 153 | 180 | 85%| Note 1
1958 | Bill Gadsby | 119 | 180 | 66.1%
1958 | Fern Flaman | 17 | 180 | 9.4%
1958 | Ron Stewart | 13 | 180 | 7.2%
1958 | Marcel Pronovost | 7 | 180 | 3.9%
1958 | Red Kelly | 3 | 180 | 1.7%
1958 | Tom Johnson | 3 | 180 | 1.7%
1958 | Dollard St. Laurent | 2 | 180 | 1.1%
1958 | Leo Boivin | 2 | 180 | 1.1%
1958 | Pierre Pilote | 2 | 180 | 1.1%
1958 | Doug Mohns | 1 | 180 | 0.6%
1958 | Jean-Guy Talbot | 1 | 180 | 0.6%
1958 | Jimmy Morrison | 1 | 180 | 0.6%
1959 | Tom Johnson | 92 | 180 | 51.1%
1959 | Bill Gadsby | 67 | 180 | 37.2%
1959 | Marcel Pronovost | 58 | 180 | 32.2%
1959 | Doug Harvey | 48 | 180 | 26.7%
1959 | Fern Flaman | 34 | 180 | 18.9%
1959 | Pierre Pilote | 19 | 180 | 10.6%
1959 | Lou Fontinato | 5 | 180 | 2.8%
1959 | Al Arbour | 1 | 180 | 0.6%
1960 | Doug Harvey | 129 | 180 | 71.7%
1960 | Allan Stanley | 42 | 180 | 23.3%
1960 | Marcel Pronovost | 39 | 180 | 21.7%
1960 | Pierre Pilote | 33 | 180 | 18.3%
1960 | Tom Johnson | 32 | 180 | 17.8%
1961 | Doug Harvey | 162 | 180 | 90%
1961 | Marcel Pronovost | 52 | 180 | 28.9%
1961 | Allan Stanley | 27 | 180 | 15%
1961 | Pierre Pilote | 24 | 180 | 13.3%
1961 | Leo Boivin | 15 | 180 | 8.3%
1962 | Doug Harvey | 102 | 180 | 56.7%
1962 | Pierre Pilote | 47 | 180 | 26.1%
1962 | Jean-Guy Talbot | 46 | 180 | 25.6%
1962 | Carl Brewer | 41 | 180 | 22.8%
1962 | Doug Mohns | 15 | 180 | 8.3%
1962 | Jack Evans | 15 | 180 | 8.3%
1962 | Tim Horton | 15 | 180 | 8.3%
1962 | Allan Stanley | 14 | 180 | 7.8%
1962 | Harry Howell | 9 | 180 | 5%
1962 | Leo Boivin | 7 | 180 | 3.9%
1962 | Marcel Pronovost | 5 | 180 | 2.8%
1962 | Tom Johnson | 5 | 180 | 2.8%
1962 | Elmer Vasko | 3 | 180 | 1.7%
1963 | Pierre Pilote | 98 | 180 | 54.4%
1963 | Carl Brewer | 81 | 180 | 45%
1963 | Tim Horton | 37 | 180 | 20.6%
1963 | Elmer Vasko | 28 | 180 | 15.6%
1963 | Bill Gadsby | 25 | 180 | 13.9%
1963 | Doug Harvey | 14 | 180 | 7.8%
1963 | Jean-Guy Talbot | 11 | 180 | 6.1%
1963 | Marcel Pronovost | 7 | 180 | 3.9%
1963 | Doug Barkley | 5 | 180 | 2.8%
1963 | Lou Fontinato | 5 | 180 | 2.8%
1963 | Doug Mohns | 4 | 180 | 2.2%
1963 | Allan Stanley | 3 | 180 | 1.7%
1963 | Kent Douglas | 3 | 180 | 1.7%
1963 | Leo Boivin | 2 | 180 | 1.1%
1963 | Albert Langlois | 1 | 180 | 0.6%
1964 | Pierre Pilote | 138 | 180 | 76.7%
1964 | Tim Horton | 70 | 180 | 38.9%
1964 | Elmer Vasko | 28 | 180 | 15.6%
1964 | Jacques Laperriere | 25 | 180 | 13.9%
1964 | Harry Howell | 13 | 180 | 7.2%
1964 | Terry Harper | 13 | 180 | 7.2%
1965 | Pierre Pilote | 93 | 180 | 51.7%
1965 | Jacques Laperriere | 78 | 180 | 43.3%
1965 | Bill Gadsby | 40 | 180 | 22.2%
1965 | Tim Horton | 27 | 180 | 15%
1965 | Marcel Pronovost | 20 | 180 | 11.1%
1965 | Carl Brewer | 19 | 180 | 10.6%
1965 | Ted Green | 17 | 180 | 9.4%
1965 | Bob Baun | 15 | 180 | 8.3%
1965 | Harry Howell | 12 | 180 | 6.7%
1965 | Doug Barkley | 1 | 180 | 0.6%
1965 | Elmer Vasko | 1 | 180 | 0.6%
1965 | JC Tremblay | 1 | 180 | 0.6%
1966 | Jacques Laperriere | 89 | 180 | 49.4%
1966 | Pierre Pilote | 54 | 180 | 30%
1966 | Pat Stapleton | 40 | 180 | 22.2%
1966 | JC Tremblay | 32 | 180 | 17.8%
1966 | Doug Barkley | 30 | 180 | 16.7%
1966 | Harry Howell | 28 | 180 | 15.6%
1966 | Allan Stanley | 23 | 180 | 12.8%
1966 | Matt Ravlich | 6 | 180 | 3.3%
1966 | Terry Harper | 5 | 180 | 2.8%
1966 | Tim Horton | 5 | 180 | 2.8%
1966 | Bill Gadsby | 4 | 180 | 2.2%
1966 | Marcel Pronovost | 4 | 180 | 2.2%
1966 | Ted Green | 3 | 180 | 1.7%
1966 | Jean-Guy Talbot | 1 | 180 | 0.6%
1967 | Harry Howell | 113 | 180 | 62.8%
1967 | Pierre Pilote | 95 | 180 | 52.8%
1967 | Bobby Orr | 36 | 180 | 20%
1967 | Tim Horton | 34 | 180 | 18.9%
1967 | JC Tremblay | 18 | 180 | 10%
1967 | Gary Bergman | 8 | 180 | 4.4%
1967 | Doug Jarrett | 7 | 180 | 3.9%
1967 | Jacques Laperriere | 5 | 180 | 2.8%
1967 | Terry Harper | 5 | 180 | 2.8%
1967 | Arnie Brown | 1 | 180 | 0.6%
1967 | Leo Boivin | 1 | 180 | 0.6%
1967 | Ted Green | 1 | 180 | 0.6%
1968 | Bobby Orr | 68 | 180 | 37.8%
1968 | JC Tremblay | 41 | 180 | 22.8%
1968 | Tim Horton | 30 | 180 | 16.7%
1968 | Jim Neilson | 26 | 180 | 14.4%
1968 | Jacques Laperriere | 15 | 180 | 8.3%
1969 | Bobby Orr | 176 | 180 | 97.8%
1969 | Tim Horton | 48 | 180 | 26.7%
1969 | Ted Green | 27 | 180 | 15%
1969 | Ted Harris | 22 | 180 | 12.2%
1969 | Al Arbour | 17 | 180 | 9.4%
1970 | Bobby Orr | 180 | 180 | 100%
1970 | Brad Park | 58 | 180 | 32.2%
1970 | Carl Brewer | 22 | 180 | 12.2%
1970 | Jacques Laperriere | 18 | 180 | 10%
1970 | Jim Neilson | 11 | 180 | 6.1%
1971 | Bobby Orr | 208 | 210 | 99%
1971 | Brad Park | 57 | 210 | 27.1%
1971 | JC Tremblay | 35 | 210 | 16.7%
1971 | Pat Stapleton | 23 | 210 | 11%
1971 | Bob Baun | 10 | 210 | 4.8%
1971 | Keith Magnuson | 10 | 210 | 4.8%
1971 | Bill White | 9 | 210 | 4.3%
1971 | Dallas Smith | 6 | 210 | 2.9%
1971 | Jim Neilson | 6 | 210 | 2.9%
1971 | Rod Seiling | 5 | 210 | 2.4%
1971 | Ted Harris | 4 | 210 | 1.9%
1971 | Tim Horton | 3 | 210 | 1.4%
1971 | Don Awrey | 1 | 210 | 0.5%
1971 | Jim Roberts | 1 | 210 | 0.5%
1972 | Bobby Orr | 204 | 210 | 97.1%
1972 | Brad Park | 117 | 210 | 55.7%
1972 | Bill White | 25 | 210 | 11.9%
1972 | Pat Stapleton | 16 | 210 | 7.6%
1972 | JC Tremblay | 8 | 210 | 3.8%
1973 | Bobby Orr | 224 | 240 | 93.3%
1973 | Guy Lapointe | 58 | 240 | 24.2%
1973 | Bill White | 36 | 240 | 15%
1973 | Brad Park | 36 | 240 | 15%
1973 | Jacques Laperriere | 25 | 240 | 10.4%
1973 | Serge Savard | 22 | 240 | 9.2%
1973 | Rod Seiling | 11 | 240 | 4.6%
1973 | Dave Burrows | 6 | 240 | 2.5%
1973 | Terry Harper | 4 | 240 | 1.7%
1973 | Tim Horton | 4 | 240 | 1.7%
1973 | Gary Bergman | 2 | 240 | 0.8%
1973 | Larry Hillman | 2 | 240 | 0.8%
1973 | Barclay Plager | 1 | 240 | 0.4%
1973 | Pat Stapleton | 1 | 240 | 0.4%
1974 | Bobby Orr | 236 | 240 | 98.3%
1974 | Brad Park | 98 | 240 | 40.8%
1974 | Bill White | 44 | 240 | 18.3%
1974 | Barry Ashbee | 11 | 240 | 4.6%
1974 | Borje Salming | 10 | 240 | 4.2%
1974 | Guy Lapointe | 8 | 240 | 3.3%
1974 | Denis Potvin | 6 | 240 | 2.5%
1974 | Dave Burrows | 4 | 240 | 1.7%
1974 | Ed Van Impe | 3 | 240 | 1.3%
1974 | Jacques Laperriere | 3 | 240 | 1.3%
1974 | Keith Magnuson | 3 | 240 | 1.3%
1974 | Barclay Plager | 1 | 240 | 0.4%
1974 | Jocelyn Guevremont | 1 | 240 | 0.4%
1974 | Larry Robinson | 1 | 240 | 0.4%
1974 | Phil Russell | 1 | 240 | 0.4%
1974 | Serge Savard | 1 | 240 | 0.4%
1974 | Terry Harper | 1 | 240 | 0.4%
1975 | Bobby Orr | 266 | 270 | 98.5%
1975 | Denis Potvin | 99 | 270 | 36.7%
1975 | Guy Lapointe | 45 | 270 | 16.7%
1975 | Borje Salming | 31 | 270 | 11.5%
1975 | Serge Savard | 14 | 270 | 5.2%
1975 | Don Awrey | 6 | 270 | 2.2%
1975 | Jerry Konrab | 6 | 270 | 2.2%
1975 | Brad Park | 5 | 270 | 1.9%
1975 | Terry Harper | 4 | 270 | 1.5%
1975 | Jim Schoenfeld | 3 | 270 | 1.1%
1975 | Carol Vadnais | 2 | 270 | 0.7%
1975 | Ed Van Impe | 2 | 270 | 0.7%
1975 | Dave Burrows | 1 | 270 | 0.4%
1975 | Larry Robinson | 1 | 270 | 0.4%
1975 | Ron Stackhouse | 1 | 270 | 0.4%
1976 | Denis Potvin | 237 | 270 | 87.8%
1976 | Brad Park | 96 | 270 | 35.6%
1976 | Borje Salming | 56 | 270 | 20.7%
1976 | Guy Lapointe | 39 | 270 | 14.4%
1976 | Serge Savard | 23 | 270 | 8.5%
1977 | Larry Robinson | 186 | 270 | 68.9%
1977 | Borje Salming | 157 | 270 | 58.1%
1977 | Denis Potvin | 58 | 270 | 21.5%
1977 | Guy Lapointe | 32 | 270 | 11.9%
1977 | Serge Savard | 29 | 270 | 10.7%
1978 | Denis Potvin | 155 | 270 | 57.4%
1978 | Brad Park | 135 | 270 | 50%
1978 | Larry Robinson | 85 | 270 | 31.5%
1978 | Borje Salming | 84 | 270 | 31.1%
1978 | Guy Lapointe | 8 | 270 | 3%
1978 | Barry Beck | 6 | 270 | 2.2%
1978 | Jim Schoenfeld | 5 | 270 | 1.9%
1978 | Serge Savard | 4 | 270 | 1.5%
1978 | Gary Sargent | 3 | 270 | 1.1%
1978 | Bob Dailey | 1 | 270 | 0.4%
1979 | Denis Potvin | 228 | 255 | 89.4%
1979 | Larry Robinson | 83 | 255 | 32.5%
1979 | Borje Salming | 65 | 255 | 25.5%
1979 | Serge Savard | 41 | 255 | 16.1%
1979 | Guy Lapointe | 12 | 255 | 4.7%
1979 | Robert Picard | 9 | 255 | 3.5%
1979 | Barry Beck | 7 | 255 | 2.7%
1979 | Brad Park | 6 | 255 | 2.4%
1979 | Ron Stackhouse | 5 | 255 | 2%
1979 | Phil Russell | 1 | 255 | 0.4%
1979 | Reed Larson | 1 | 255 | 0.4%
1979 | Stefan Persson | 1 | 255 | 0.4%
1980 | Larry Robinson | 239 | 315 | 75.9%
1980 | Borje Salming | 117 | 315 | 37.1%
1980 | Jim Schoenfeld | 85 | 315 | 27%
1980 | Ray Bourque | 51 | 315 | 16.2%
1980 | Mark Howe | 23 | 315 | 7.3%
1981 | Randy Carlyle | 120 | 315 | 38.1%
1981 | Denis Potvin | 113 | 315 | 35.9%
1981 | Larry Robinson | 100 | 315 | 31.7%
1981 | Ray Bourque | 53 | 315 | 16.8%
1981 | Rod Langway | 38 | 315 | 12.1%
1981 | Brian Engblom | 21 | 315 | 6.7%
1981 | Larry Murphy | 16 | 315 | 5.1%
1981 | Rob Ramage | 15 | 315 | 4.8%
1981 | Brad Park | 14 | 315 | 4.4%
1981 | Borje Salming | 11 | 315 | 3.5%
1981 | Mark Howe | 11 | 315 | 3.5%
1981 | Jim Schoenfeld | 10 | 315 | 3.2%
1981 | Dave Langevin | 9 | 315 | 2.9%
1981 | Ron Greschner | 8 | 315 | 2.5%
1981 | Bill Hajt | 5 | 315 | 1.6%
1981 | Kevin McCarthy | 5 | 315 | 1.6%
1981 | Stefan Persson | 5 | 315 | 1.6%
1981 | John Van Boxmeer | 4 | 315 | 1.3%
1981 | Reed Larson | 4 | 315 | 1.3%
1981 | Dave Lewis | 2 | 315 | 0.6%
1981 | Curt Giles | 1 | 315 | 0.3%
1981 | Rick Lapointe | 1 | 315 | 0.3%
1981 | Risto Siltanen | 1 | 315 | 0.3%
1982 | Doug Wilson | 177 | 315 | 56.2%
1982 | Ray Bourque | 80 | 315 | 25.4%
1982 | Paul Coffey | 55 | 315 | 17.5%
1982 | Craig Hartsburg | 54 | 315 | 17.1%
1982 | Larry Robinson | 50 | 315 | 15.9%
1982 | Brian Engblom | 31 | 315 | 9.8%
1982 | Barry Beck | 28 | 315 | 8.9%
1982 | Denis Potvin | 27 | 315 | 8.6%
1982 | Rod Langway | 24 | 315 | 7.6%
1982 | Kevin Lowe | 20 | 315 | 6.3%
1982 | John Van Boxmeer | 6 | 315 | 1.9%
1982 | Ken Morrow | 5 | 315 | 1.6%
1982 | Borje Salming | 4 | 315 | 1.3%
1982 | Randy Carlyle | 4 | 315 | 1.3%
1982 | Brad Park | 1 | 315 | 0.3%
1982 | Mike Ramsey | 1 | 315 | 0.3%
1983 | Rod Langway | 180 | 315 | 57.1%
1983 | Mark Howe | 155 | 315 | 49.2%
1983 | Ray Bourque | 139 | 315 | 44.1%
1983 | Doug Wilson | 29 | 315 | 9.2%
1983 | Paul Coffey | 24 | 315 | 7.6%
1984 | Rod Langway | 227 | 310 | 73.2%
1984 | Paul Coffey | 126 | 310 | 40.6%
1984 | Ray Bourque | 120 | 310 | 38.7%
1984 | Denis Potvin | 66 | 310 | 21.3%
1984 | Phil Housley | 4 | 310 | 1.3%
1984 | Charlie Huddy | 3 | 310 | 1%
1984 | Mike O’Connell | 3 | 310 | 1%
1984 | Scott Stevens | 3 | 310 | 1%
1984 | Barry Beck | 2 | 310 | 0.6%
1984 | Ken Morrow | 1 | 310 | 0.3%
1984 | Mario Marois | 1 | 310 | 0.3%
1984 | Mark Howe | 1 | 310 | 0.3%
1984 | Mike Ramsey | 1 | 310 | 0.3%
1985 | Paul Coffey | 223 | 315 | 70.8%
1985 | Ray Bourque | 136 | 315 | 43.2%
1985 | Rod Langway | 89 | 315 | 28.3%
1985 | Doug Wilson | 84 | 315 | 26.7%
1985 | Scott Stevens | 13 | 315 | 4.1%
1985 | Mark Howe | 12 | 315 | 3.8%
1985 | Brad Marsh | 3 | 315 | 1%
1985 | Kevin Lowe | 3 | 315 | 1%
1985 | Randy Carlyle | 3 | 315 | 1%
1985 | Reed Larson | 1 | 315 | 0.3%
1986 | Paul Coffey | 280 | 300 | 93.3%
1986 | Mark Howe | 172 | 300 | 57.3%
1986 | Larry Robinson | 43 | 300 | 14.3%
1986 | Ray Bourque | 25 | 300 | 8.3%
1986 | Rod Langway | 19 | 300 | 6.3%
1986 | Dave Babych | 1 | 300 | 0.3%
1987 | Ray Bourque | 266 | 270 | 98.5%
1987 | Mark Howe | 137 | 270 | 50.7%
1987 | Larry Murphy | 31 | 270 | 11.5%
1987 | Larry Robinson | 12 | 270 | 4.4%
1987 | Paul Coffey | 10 | 270 | 3.7%
1987 | Al MacInnis | 6 | 270 | 2.2%
1987 | Scott Stevens | 6 | 270 | 2.2%
1987 | Mario Marois | 5 | 270 | 1.9%
1987 | Rick Green | 4 | 270 | 1.5%
1987 | Ulf Samuelsson | 3 | 270 | 1.1%
1987 | Rod Langway | 2 | 270 | 0.7%
1987 | Craig Hartsburg | 1 | 270 | 0.4%
1987 | Doug Wilson | 1 | 270 | 0.4%
1987 | James Patrick | 1 | 270 | 0.4%
1987 | Mike Ramsey | 1 | 270 | 0.4%
1988 | Ray Bourque | 245 | 315 | 77.8%
1988 | Scott Stevens | 124 | 315 | 39.4%
1988 | Gary Suter | 80 | 315 | 25.4%
1988 | Brad McCrimmon | 70 | 315 | 22.2%
1988 | Kevin Lowe | 24 | 315 | 7.6%
1988 | Chris Chelios | 10 | 315 | 3.2%
1988 | James Patrick | 5 | 315 | 1.6%
1988 | Paul Coffey | 5 | 315 | 1.6%
1988 | Mark Howe | 3 | 315 | 1%
1988 | Denis Potvin | 1 | 315 | 0.3%
1989 | Chris Chelios | 226 | 315 | 71.7%
1989 | Paul Coffey | 115 | 315 | 36.5%
1989 | Al MacInnis | 57 | 315 | 18.1%
1989 | Ray Bourque | 56 | 315 | 17.8%
1989 | Steve Duchesne | 30 | 315 | 9.5%
1989 | Brad McCrimmon | 24 | 315 | 7.6%
1989 | Gary Suter | 15 | 315 | 4.8%
1989 | Kevin Lowe | 14 | 315 | 4.4%
1989 | Phil Housley | 11 | 315 | 3.5%
1989 | Scott Stevens | 8 | 315 | 2.5%
1989 | Brian Leetch | 6 | 315 | 1.9%
1989 | Paul Reinhart | 4 | 315 | 1.3%
1989 | Craig Ludwig | 1 | 315 | 0.3%
1990 | Ray Bourque | 315 | 315 | 100%
1990 | Al MacInnis | 127 | 315 | 40.3%
1990 | Doug Wilson | 40 | 315 | 12.7%
1990 | Paul Coffey | 33 | 315 | 10.5%
1990 | Phil Housley | 32 | 315 | 10.2%
1990 | Al Iafrate | 8 | 315 | 2.5%
1990 | Mike Ramsey | 4 | 315 | 1.3%
1990 | Chris Chelios | 3 | 315 | 1%
1990 | Paul Cavallini | 2 | 315 | 0.6%
1990 | Brian Leetch | 1 | 315 | 0.3%
1990 | Craig Ludwig | 1 | 315 | 0.3%
1990 | Jamie Macoun | 1 | 315 | 0.3%
1991 | Ray Bourque | 257 | 330 | 77.9%
1991 | Al MacInnis | 228 | 330 | 69.1%
1991 | Chris Chelios | 56 | 330 | 17%
1991 | Brian Leetch | 30 | 330 | 9.1%
1991 | Paul Coffey | 8 | 330 | 2.4%
1991 | Kevin Hatcher | 7 | 330 | 2.1%
1991 | Scott Stevens | 6 | 330 | 1.8%
1991 | James Patrick | 2 | 330 | 0.6%
1992 | Brian Leetch | 335 | 345 | 97.1%
1992 | Ray Bourque | 112 | 345 | 32.5%
1992 | Phil Housley | 82 | 345 | 23.8%
1992 | Scott Stevens | 44 | 345 | 12.8%
1992 | Larry Murphy | 37 | 345 | 10.7%
1992 | Chris Chelios | 8 | 345 | 2.3%
1992 | Kevin Hatcher | 2 | 345 | 0.6%
1992 | Al MacInnis | 1 | 345 | 0.3%
1993 | Chris Chelios | 201 | 250 | 80.4%
1993 | Ray Bourque | 97 | 250 | 38.8%
1993 | Larry Murphy | 93 | 250 | 37.2%
1993 | Kevin Hatcher | 17 | 250 | 6.8%
1993 | Phil Housley | 16 | 250 | 6.4%
1993 | Al Iafrate | 10 | 250 | 4%
1993 | Gary Suter | 5 | 250 | 2%
1993 | Steve Duchesne | 5 | 250 | 2%
1993 | Paul Coffey | 4 | 250 | 1.6%
1993 | Scott Stevens | 1 | 250 | 0.4%
1993 | Ulf Samuelsson | 1 | 250 | 0.4%
1994 | Ray Bourque | 199 | 270 | 73.7%
1994 | Scott Stevens | 195 | 270 | 72.2%
1994 | Al MacInnis | 60 | 270 | 22.2%
1994 | Sergei Zubov | 15 | 270 | 5.6%
1994 | Brian Leetch | 10 | 270 | 3.7%
1994 | Chris Chelios | 3 | 270 | 1.1%
1994 | Larry Murphy | 1 | 270 | 0.4%
1994 | Nicklas Lidstrom | 1 | 270 | 0.4%
1994 | Paul Coffey | 1 | 270 | 0.4%
1994 | Sandis Ozolinsh | 1 | 270 | 0.4%
1995 | Paul Coffey | 69 | 75 | 92% | Note 2
1995 | Chris Chelios | 39 | 75 | 52%
1995 | Ray Bourque | 20 | 75 | 26.7%
1995 | Larry Murphy | 7 | 75 | 9.3%

Year|Player|Votes|Max|Percentage|Notes
1996 | Chris Chelios | 408 | 540 | 75.6%
1996 | Ray Bourque | 403 | 540 | 74.6%
1996 | Brian Leetch | 245 | 540 | 45.4%
1996 | Vladimir Konstantinov | 131 | 540 | 24.3%
1996 | Paul Coffey | 83 | 540 | 15.4%
1996 | Nicklas Lidstrom | 54 | 540 | 10%
1996 | Roman Hamrlik | 25 | 540 | 4.6%
1996 | Gary Suter | 11 | 540 | 2%
1996 | Eric Desjardins | 9 | 540 | 1.7%
1996 | Scott Stevens | 9 | 540 | 1.7%
1996 | Teppo Numminen | 7 | 540 | 1.3%
1996 | Mark Tinordi | 5 | 540 | 0.9%
1996 | Sergei Zubov | 5 | 540 | 0.9%
1996 | Larry Murphy | 3 | 540 | 0.6%
1996 | Phil Housley | 3 | 540 | 0.6%
1996 | Calle Johansson | 1 | 540 | 0.2%
1996 | Ed Jovanovski | 1 | 540 | 0.2%
1996 | Shawn Chambers | 1 | 540 | 0.2%
1997 | Brian Leetch | 494 | 540 | 91.5%
1997 | Vladimir Konstantinov | 178 | 540 | 33%
1997 | Sandis Ozolinsh | 176 | 540 | 32.6%
1997 | Chris Chelios | 172 | 540 | 31.9%
1997 | Scott Stevens | 171 | 540 | 31.7%
1997 | Nicklas Lidstrom | 60 | 540 | 11.1%
1997 | Darryl Sydor | 45 | 540 | 8.3%
1997 | Ray Bourque | 45 | 540 | 8.3%
1997 | Eric Desjardins | 21 | 540 | 3.9%
1997 | Oleg Tverdovsky | 9 | 540 | 1.7%
1997 | Bryan Berard | 8 | 540 | 1.5%
1997 | Kevin Hatcher | 6 | 540 | 1.1%
1997 | Sergei Zubov | 5 | 540 | 0.9%
1997 | Robert Svehla | 4 | 540 | 0.7%
1997 | Chris Pronger | 3 | 540 | 0.6%
1997 | Steve Duchesne | 3 | 540 | 0.6%
1997 | Derian Hatcher | 2 | 540 | 0.4%
1997 | Dmitri Mironov | 1 | 540 | 0.2%
1997 | Sergei Gonchar | 1 | 540 | 0.2%
1998 | Rob Blake | 401 | 540 | 74.3%
1998 | Nicklas Lidstrom | 369 | 540 | 68.3%
1998 | Chris Pronger | 316 | 540 | 58.5%
1998 | Scott Stevens | 84 | 540 | 15.6%
1998 | Scott Niedermayer | 58 | 540 | 10.7%
1998 | Larry Murphy | 47 | 540 | 8.7%
1998 | Ray Bourque | 37 | 540 | 6.9%
1998 | Al MacInnis | 26 | 540 | 4.8%
1998 | Sergei Zubov | 22 | 540 | 4.1%
1998 | Teppo Numminen | 22 | 540 | 4.1%
1998 | Darryl Sydor | 6 | 540 | 1.1%
1998 | Alexei Zhitnik | 3 | 540 | 0.6%
1998 | Chris Chelios | 3 | 540 | 0.6%
1998 | Darius Kasparaitis | 3 | 540 | 0.6%
1998 | Kenny Jonsson | 3 | 540 | 0.6%
1998 | Boris Mironov | 1 | 540 | 0.2%
1998 | Calle Johansson | 1 | 540 | 0.2%
1998 | Eric Desjardins | 1 | 540 | 0.2%
1998 | Kevin Hatcher | 1 | 540 | 0.2%
1999 | Al MacInnis | 548 | 560 | 97.9%
1999 | Nicklas Lidstrom | 234 | 560 | 41.8%
1999 | Ray Bourque | 157 | 560 | 28%
1999 | Chris Pronger | 107 | 560 | 19.1%
1999 | Eric Desjardins | 91 | 560 | 16.3%
1999 | Scott Stevens | 55 | 560 | 9.8%
1999 | Derian Hatcher | 53 | 560 | 9.5%
1999 | Brian Leetch | 49 | 560 | 8.8%
1999 | Fredrik Olausson | 48 | 560 | 8.6%
1999 | Phil Housley | 40 | 560 | 7.1%
1999 | Larry Murphy | 21 | 560 | 3.8%
1999 | Scott Niedermayer | 18 | 560 | 3.2%
1999 | Sergei Zubov | 12 | 560 | 2.1%
1999 | Aleksander Karpovtsev | 6 | 560 | 1.1%
1999 | Adam Foote | 5 | 560 | 0.9%
1999 | Darryl Sydor | 5 | 560 | 0.9%
1999 | Rob Blake | 4 | 560 | 0.7%
1999 | Chris Chelios | 1 | 560 | 0.2%
1999 | Darryl Shannon | 1 | 560 | 0.2%
2000 | Chris Pronger | 565 | 580 | 97.4%
2000 | Nicklas Lidstrom | 400 | 580 | 69%
2000 | Rob Blake | 196 | 580 | 33.8%
2000 | Eric Desjardins | 119 | 580 | 20.5%
2000 | Sergei Gonchar | 78 | 580 | 13.4%
2000 | Chris Chelios | 54 | 580 | 9.3%
2000 | Ray Bourque | 36 | 580 | 6.2%
2000 | Al MacInnis | 23 | 580 | 4%
2000 | Sergei Zubov | 10 | 580 | 1.7%
2000 | Scott Stevens | 9 | 580 | 1.6%
2000 | Teppo Numminen | 4 | 580 | 0.7%
2000 | Wade Redden | 4 | 580 | 0.7%
2000 | Sean Hill | 3 | 580 | 0.5%
2000 | Oleg Tverdovsky | 2 | 580 | 0.3%
2000 | Robert Svehla | 2 | 580 | 0.3%
2000 | Derian Hatcher | 1 | 580 | 0.2%
2000 | Ed Jovanovski | 1 | 580 | 0.2%
2000 | Sandis Ozolinsh | 1 | 580 | 0.2%
2001 | Nicklas Lidstrom | 600 | 620 | 96.8%
2001 | Ray Bourque | 251 | 620 | 40.5%
2001 | Scott Stevens | 203 | 620 | 32.7%
2001 | Rob Blake | 176 | 620 | 28.4%
2001 | Brian Leetch | 126 | 620 | 20.3%
2001 | Sergei Gonchar | 94 | 620 | 15.2%
2001 | Al MacInnis | 49 | 620 | 7.9%
2001 | Sergei Zubov | 28 | 620 | 4.5%
2001 | Brian Rafalski | 26 | 620 | 4.2%
2001 | Chris Pronger | 14 | 620 | 2.3%
2001 | Eric Desjardins | 14 | 620 | 2.3%
2001 | Wade Redden | 13 | 620 | 2.1%
2001 | Derian Hatcher | 9 | 620 | 1.5%
2001 | Dan McGillis | 4 | 620 | 0.6%
2001 | Ed Jovanovski | 2 | 620 | 0.3%
2001 | Brad Lukowich | 1 | 620 | 0.2%
2001 | Jason Smith | 1 | 620 | 0.2%
2001 | Oleg Tverdovsky | 1 | 620 | 0.2%
2002 | Nicklas Lidstrom | 472 | 620 | 76.1%
2002 | Chris Chelios | 431 | 620 | 69.5%
2002 | Rob Blake | 321 | 620 | 51.8%
2002 | Sergei Gonchar | 147 | 620 | 23.7%
2002 | Chris Pronger | 62 | 620 | 10%
2002 | Ed Jovanovski | 53 | 620 | 8.5%
2002 | Teppo Numminen | 44 | 620 | 7.1%
2002 | Adrian Aucoin | 28 | 620 | 4.5%
2002 | Brian Leetch | 22 | 620 | 3.5%
2002 | Mattias Ohlund | 5 | 620 | 0.8%
2002 | Scott Stevens | 5 | 620 | 0.8%
2003 | Nicklas Lidstrom | 560 | 620 | 90.3%
2003 | Al MacInnis | 486 | 620 | 78.4%
2003 | Derian Hatcher | 142 | 620 | 22.9%
2003 | Sergei Gonchar | 131 | 620 | 21.1%
2003 | Rob Blake | 62 | 620 | 10%
2003 | Ed Jovanovski | 58 | 620 | 9.4%
2003 | Zdeno Chara | 55 | 620 | 8.9%
2003 | Sergei Zubov | 37 | 620 | 6%
2003 | Wade Redden | 21 | 620 | 3.4%
2003 | Adam Foote | 18 | 620 | 2.9%
2003 | Tomas Kaberle | 9 | 620 | 1.5%
2003 | Dan Boyle | 8 | 620 | 1.3%
2003 | Scott Niedermayer | 7 | 620 | 1.1%
2003 | Eric Desjardins | 6 | 620 | 1%
2003 | Brian Leetch | 5 | 620 | 0.8%
2003 | Scott Stevens | 5 | 620 | 0.8%
2003 | Chris Chelios | 1 | 620 | 0.2%
2003 | Sandis Ozolinsh | 1 | 620 | 0.2%
2004 | Scott Niedermayer | 872 | 1040 | 83.8%
2004 | Zdeno Chara | 563 | 1040 | 54.1%
2004 | Chris Pronger | 345 | 1040 | 33.2%
2004 | Bryan McCabe | 189 | 1040 | 18.2%
2004 | Adrian Aucoin | 166 | 1040 | 16%
2004 | Nicklas Lidstrom | 165 | 1040 | 15.9%
2004 | Mathieu Schneider | 144 | 1040 | 13.8%
2004 | Rob Blake | 124 | 1040 | 11.9%
2004 | Sergei Gonchar | 55 | 1040 | 5.3%
2004 | Wade Redden | 31 | 1040 | 3%
2004 | Brian Leetch | 19 | 1040 | 1.8%
2004 | Sheldon Souray | 12 | 1040 | 1.2%
2004 | Marek Malik | 7 | 1040 | 0.7%
2004 | Mattias Ohlund | 3 | 1040 | 0.3%
2004 | Marek Zidlicky | 2 | 1040 | 0.2%
2004 | Pavel Kubina | 2 | 1040 | 0.2%
2004 | Bryan Berard | 1 | 1040 | 0.1%
2004 | Dan Boyle | 1 | 1040 | 0.1%
2004 | Dick Tarnstrom | 1 | 1040 | 0.1%
2004 | Mike Rathje | 1 | 1040 | 0.1%
2004 | Sergei Zubov | 1 | 1040 | 0.1%
2006 | Nicklas Lidstrom | 1152 | 1290 | 89.3%
2006 | Scott Niedermayer | 817 | 1290 | 63.3%
2006 | Sergei Zubov | 464 | 1290 | 36%
2006 | Zdeno Chara | 430 | 1290 | 33.3%
2006 | Wade Redden | 115 | 1290 | 8.9%
2006 | Mathieu Schneider | 111 | 1290 | 8.6%
2006 | Chris Pronger | 97 | 1290 | 7.5%
2006 | Dion Phaneuf | 61 | 1290 | 4.7%
2006 | Bryan McCabe | 44 | 1290 | 3.4%
2006 | Lubomir Visnovsky | 39 | 1290 | 3%
2006 | Brian Rafalski | 7 | 1290 | 0.5%
2006 | Rob Blake | 6 | 1290 | 0.5%
2006 | Tomas Kaberle | 5 | 1290 | 0.4%
2006 | Robyn Regehr | 2 | 1290 | 0.2%
2006 | Dan Boyle | 1 | 1290 | 0.1%
2006 | Joni Pitkanen | 1 | 1290 | 0.1%
2006 | Marek Zidlicky | 1 | 1290 | 0.1%
2006 | Sergei Gonchar | 1 | 1290 | 0.1%
2007 | Nicklas Lidstrom | 1217 | 1430 | 85.1%
2007 | Scott Niedermayer | 1024 | 1430 | 71.6%
2007 | Chris Pronger | 608 | 1430 | 42.5%
2007 | Dan Boyle | 219 | 1430 | 15.3%
2007 | Kimmo Timonen | 144 | 1430 | 10.1%
2007 | Dion Phaneuf | 98 | 1430 | 6.9%
2007 | Sergei Gonchar | 85 | 1430 | 5.9%
2007 | Sheldon Souray | 67 | 1430 | 4.7%
2007 | Brian Campbell | 42 | 1430 | 2.9%
2007 | Sergei Zubov | 42 | 1430 | 2.9%
2007 | Jay Bouwmeester | 32 | 1430 | 2.2%
2007 | Philippe Boucher | 27 | 1430 | 1.9%
2007 | Ryan Whitney | 20 | 1430 | 1.4%
2007 | Brian Rafalski | 18 | 1430 | 1.3%
2007 | Tom Preissing | 15 | 1430 | 1%
2007 | Lubomir Visnovsky | 12 | 1430 | 0.8%
2007 | Tomas Kaberle | 12 | 1430 | 0.8%
2007 | Chris Phillips | 7 | 1430 | 0.5%
2007 | Keith Carney | 5 | 1430 | 0.3%
2007 | Zdeno Chara | 4 | 1430 | 0.3%
2007 | Anton Volchenkov | 3 | 1430 | 0.2%
2007 | Mathieu Schneider | 3 | 1430 | 0.2%
2007 | Robyn Regehr | 3 | 1430 | 0.2%
2007 | Alexei Zhitnik | 1 | 1430 | 0.1%
2007 | Andrei Markov | 1 | 1430 | 0.1%
2007 | Bryan McCabe | 1 | 1430 | 0.1%
2007 | Kevin Bieksa | 1 | 1430 | 0.1%
2008 | Nicklas Lidstrom | 1313 | 1340 | 98%
2008 | Dion Phaneuf | 561 | 1340 | 41.9%
2008 | Zdeno Chara | 486 | 1340 | 36.3%
2008 | Sergei Gonchar | 370 | 1340 | 27.6%
2008 | Brian Campbell | 333 | 1340 | 24.9%
2008 | Andrei Markov | 156 | 1340 | 11.6%
2008 | Mike Green | 84 | 1340 | 6.3%
2008 | Chris Pronger | 56 | 1340 | 4.2%
2008 | Brian Rafalski | 25 | 1340 | 1.9%
2008 | Scott Niedermayer | 22 | 1340 | 1.6%
2008 | Duncan Keith | 19 | 1340 | 1.4%
2008 | Brent Burns | 14 | 1340 | 1%
2008 | Mark Streit | 11 | 1340 | 0.8%
2008 | Mathieu Schneider | 9 | 1340 | 0.7%
2008 | Ed Jovanovski | 8 | 1340 | 0.6%
2008 | Wade Redden | 3 | 1340 | 0.2%
2008 | Andrej Meszaros | 1 | 1340 | 0.1%
2008 | Jassen Cullimore | 1 | 1340 | 0.1%
2008 | Joe Corvo | 1 | 1340 | 0.1%
2008 | John-Michael Liles | 1 | 1340 | 0.1%
2008 | Kimmo Timonen | 1 | 1340 | 0.1%
2008 | Mike Komisarek | 1 | 1340 | 0.1%
2008 | Sergei Zubov | 1 | 1340 | 0.1%
2008 | Shea Weber | 1 | 1340 | 0.1%
2008 | Tomas Kaberle | 1 | 1340 | 0.1%

Note 1: the newspaper said that Bill Gadsby only received 34 points; however the NHL Awards Media Guide says that he received 119 points. I am assuming that 119 points is correct because this makes the total for the year add up to the correct amount (180 * 9 /5 = 324).

Note 2: per BM67's note, each conference voted for three nominees, then the Norris winner was selected from that pool of six players. Steve Duchesne and Brian Leetch were both voted as a top-three player in their conference during the first stage of voting but received zero votes in the second (final) stage of voting. One could argue that they should be counted as finishing in 5th place (tied) in Norris voting, despite earning zero votes.

Sources

• 1954: The Globe & Mail (Friday, April 30, 1954, pg 22) – partial results
• 1956: The Globe & Mail (Friday, April 27, 1956, pg 23)
• 1957: The Globe & Mail (Friday, May 3, 1957, pg 18) – partial results
• 1958: The Globe & Mail (Wednesday, May 7, 1958, pg 17)
• 1959: The Globe & Mail (Saturday, May 9, 1959, pg 26)
• 1961: The Globe & Mail (Wednesday, May 3, 1961, pg 19) – partial results
• 1962: The Globe & Mail (Saturday, May 12, 1962, pg 27)
• 1963: The Globe & Mail (Tuesday, May 7, 1963, pg 30)
• 1965: The Globe & Mail (Tuesday, May 18, 1965, pg 35)
• 1966: The Globe & Mail (Tuesday, May 24, 1966, pg 31)
• 1967: The Globe & Mail (Thursday, April 27, 1967, pg 26)
• 1968: The Globe & Mail (Saturday, May 11, 1968, pg 40)
• 1969: The Globe & Mail (Tuesday, April 29, 1969, pg 32) – partial results
• 1970: The Globe & Mail (Saturday, May 9, 1970, pg 39) – partial results
• 1971: The Globe & Mail (Tuesday, May 11, 1971, pg 36)
• 1973: The Globe & Mail (Saturday, May 19, 1973, pg 49)
• 1974: The Globe & Mail (Wednesday, June 12, 1974, pg 37)
• 1975: The Globe & Mail (Wednesday, June 18, 1975, pg S02)
• 1978: The Globe & Mail (Tuesday, June 13, 1978, pg 36)
• 1980: The Globe & Mail (Friday, June 6, 1980, pg 35)
• 1981: The Globe & Mail (Friday, June 5, 1981, pg 45) – no details aside from Carlyle winning
• 1983: The Globe & Mail (Wednesday, June 8, 1983, pg S01) – no details aside from Langway winning
• 1985: The Globe & Mail (Thursday, June 13, 1985, pg M11) – no details aside from Coffey winning
• 1991: The Ottawa Citizen (Thursday, June 6, 1991, pg. H8)
• 1992: NHL 1993 Yearbook
• 1993: Toronto Star (Friday, June 18, 1993, sec. D, pg. B5) – partial results
• 1996: The Globe & Mail (Thursday, June 20, 1996, pg. E16) – partial results
• 1997: The Globe & Mail (Saturday, June 21, 1997, pg. A19) – partial results
• 2002: USA Today. http://www.usatoday.com/sports/hockey/stories/2002-06-20-awards-totals.htm
• 2003: Sports Illustrated. http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/hockey/news/2003/06/12/awards_voting/
• 2004: MSNBC. http://nbcsports.msnbc.com/id/5185149/
• 2007: NHL.com. http://avalanche.nhl.com/team/app?articleid=319889&page=NewsPage&service=page
• 2008: James Mirtle blog. http://mirtle.blogspot.com/2008/06/2007-08-norris-voting.html
• General source: "2004 NHL Awards Media Guide"
• General source: data from page 5 of this thread (BM67's posts)

I would like to make this list as detailed and comprehensive as possible. Please send me a PM if you have missing data, or if you have an objective source (ie newspaper, book, magazine, etc) for any years where I don't have a unique source.

 

[Macke*]

So I've browsed the first few pages of this thread and I'm guessing Conn Smythe numbers never get released eh?

That's a bummer..

 

[Know Your Enemy]

Is there an updated master list of all voting records anywhere?

 

[Dark Shadows]

Is there an updated master list of all voting records anywhere?

Between page 5 and here, its all there.

 

[canucks4ever]

Nobody seems to have posted 2000/2001 votes yet, so here they are.

2000-2001 Hart

1. Joe Sakic, COL 585 (53-6-2-1-0)
2. Mario Lemieux, PIT 272 (8-17-10-6-5)
3. Jaromir Jagr, PIT 210 (0-20-10-5-5)
4. Roman Cechmanek, PHI 89 (0-2-8-10-5)
5. Martin Brodeur, N.J. 64 (0-4-4-4-4)
6. Patrik Elias, N.J. 61 (0-3-4-5-5)
7. Doug Weight, EDM 61 (0-2-7-2-6)
8. Dominik Hasek, BUF 42 (0-3-2-3-2)
9. Pavel Bure, FLA 41 (0-0-4-5-6)
10. Nicklas Lidstrom, DET 38 (0-2-1-6-1)
11. Markus Naslund, VAN 20 (1-1-0-0-3)
12. Sean Burke, PHX 17 (0-0-2-1-4)
13. Mike Modano, DAL 17 (0-0-1-3-3)
14. Alexei Yashin, OTT 15 (0-0-2-1-2)
15. Scott Stevens, N.J. 13 (0-0-2-1-0)
16. Alexei Kovalev, PIT 10 (0-1-0-1-0)
17. Tommy Salo, EDM 10 (0-0-2-0-0)
18. Evgeni Nabokov, S.J. 8 (0-0-1-0-3)
19. Sergei Fedorov, DET 7 (0-1-0-0-0)
20. Peter Bondra, WSH 7 (0-0-0-1-4)
21. Jason Allison, BOS 4 (0-0-0-1-1)
Steve Yzerman, DET 4 (0-0-0-1-1)
23. Rob Blake, L.A.-COL 3 (0-0-0-1-0)
Brett Hull, DAL 3 (0-0-0-1-0)
Patrick Lalime, OTT 3 (0-0-0-1-0)
Keith Primeau, PHI 3 (0-0-0-1-0)
Mark Recchi, PHI 3 (0-0-0-1-0)
28. Arturs Irbe, CAR 1 (0-0-0-0-1)
Jeff O'Neill, CAR 1 (0-0-0-0-1)

2000-2001 Vezina

1. Dominik Hasek, BUF 85 (9-12-4)
2. Roman Cechmanek, PHI 65 (7-9-3)
3. Martin Brodeur, N.J. 42 (7-2-1)
4. Evgeni Nabokov, S.J. 29 (3-3-5)
5. Patrick Roy, COL 19 (2-1-6)
6. Sean Burke, PHX 12 (1-2-1)
7. Tommy Salo, EDM 7 (1-0-2)
8. Curtis Joseph, TOR 4 (0-1-1)
9. Patrick Lalime, OTT 3 (0-0-3)
10. Arturs Irbe, CAR 2 (0-0-2)
11. Ed Belfour, DAL 1 (0-0-1)
Manny Fernandez, MIN 1 (0-0-1)

2000-2001 Norris

1. Nicklas Lidstrom, DET 600 (56-5-1-0-0)
2. Ray Bourque, COL 251 (4-16-12-10-9)
3. Scott Stevens, N.J. 203 (1-15-14-4-6)
4. Rob Blake, L.A.-COL 176 (1-11-8-14-7)
5. Brian Leetch, NYR 126 (0-9-7-5-13)
6. Sergei Gonchar, WSH 94 (0-1-9-12-6)
7. Al MacInnis, STL 49 (0-0-6-5-4)
8. Sergei Zubov, DAL 28 (0-1-1-4-4)
9. Brian Rafalski, N.J. 26 (0-2-1-2-1)
10. Eric Desjardins, PHI 14 (0-2-0-0-0)
11. Chris Pronger, STL 14 (0-0-1-2-3)
12. Wade Redden, OTT 13 (0-0-1-2-2)
13. Derian Hatcher, DAL 9 (0-0-1-1-1)
14. Dan McGillis, PHI 4 (0-0-0-1-1)
15. Ed Jovanovski, VAN 2 (0-0-0-0-2)
16. Brad Lukowich, DAL 1 (0-0-0-0-1)
Jason Smith, EDM 1 (0-0-0-0-1)
Oleg Tverdovsky, ANA 1 (0-0-0-0-1)

2000-2001 Selke

1. John Madden, N.J. 269 (14-10-10-2-3)
2. Joe Sakic, COL 249 (15-9-3-6-3)
3. Mike Modano, DAL 199 (8-8-7-8-4)
4. Mike Ricci, S.J. 125 (6-2-6-6-3)
5. Steve Yzerman, DET 108 (3-7-3-3-5)
6. Jere Lehtinen, DAL 93 (1-4-8-3-6)
7. Radek Bonk, OTT 66 (2-4-1-4-1)
8. Patrik Elias, N.J. 64 (2-2-4-3-1)
9. Bobby Holik, N.J. 47 (2-3-1-0-1)
10. Todd Marchant, EDM 46 (1-2-4-0-2)
11. Peter Forsberg, COL 44 (2-3-0-0-3)
12. Sergei Fedorov, DET 35 (2-0-3-0-0)
13. Curtis Brown, BUF 30 (2-1-0-1-0)
14. Marian Hossa, OTT 19 (1-0-1-1-1)
15. Petr Sykora, N.J. 19 (0-2-0-1-2)
16. Magnus Arvedson, OTT 18 (0-1-1-1-3)
17. Rod Brind'Amour, CAR 14 (0-1-0-2-1)
18. Zigmund Palffy, L.A. 13 (1-0-0-1-0)
19. Jeff Halpern, WSH 13 (0-0-2-0-3)
20. Gary Roberts, TOR 12 (0-1-1-0-0)
21. Milan Hejduk, COL 12 (0-1-0-1-2)
22. Mike Keane, DAL 10 (0-1-0-1-0)
23. Kris Draper, DET 10 (0-0-2-0-0)
24. Steve Konowalchuk, WSH 9 (0-0-0-3-0)
25. Niklas Sundstrom, S.J. 8 (0-0-1-1-0)
26. Craig Conroy, STL-CGY 7 (0-0-1-0-2)
27. Rob Zamuner, OTT 7 (0-0-0-2-1)
28. Paul Kariya, ANA 6 (0-0-1-0-1)
29. Steve Sullivan, CHI 6 (0-0-0-2-0)
30. Andrei Nikolishin, WSH 5 (0-0-1-0-0)
Owen Nolan, S.J. 5 (0-0-1-0-0)
32. Adam Oates, WSH 4 (0-0-0-1-1)
Doug Weight, EDM 4 (0-0-0-1-1)
34. Kevyn Adams, CBJ 3 (0-0-0-1-0)
Mike Grier, EDM 3 (0-0-0-1-0)
Michal Handzus, STL-PHX 3 (0-0-0-1-0)
Alexander Mogilny, N.J. 3 (0-0-0-1-0)
Joe Nieuwendyk, DAL 3 (0-0-0-1-0)
Dave Reid, COL 3 (0-0-0-1-0)
Mike Sullivan, PHX 3 (0-0-0-1-0)
41. Bill Guerin, EDM-BOS 2 (0-0-0-0-2)
Dave Scatchard, NYI 2 (0-0-0-0-2)
43. Andrew Cassels, VAN 1 (0-0-0-0-1)
Ron Francis, CAR 1 (0-0-0-0-1)
Kent Manderville, PHI 1 (0-0-0-0-1)
Randy McKay, N.J. 1 (0-0-0-0-1)
Mark Recchi, PHI 1 (0-0-0-0-1)
Brendan Shanahan, DET 1 (0-0-0-0-1)
Ryan Smyth, EDM 1 (0-0-0-0-1)
Stephane Yelle, COL 1 (0-0-0-0-1)

2000-2001 Calder

1. Evgeni Nabokov, S.J. 565 (50-7-2-2-0)
2. Brad Richards, T.B. 416 (9-38-10-3-1)
3. Martin Havlat, OTT 240 (2-5-26-17-4)
4. Lubomir Visnovsky, L.A. 124 (0-5-9-12-8)
5. Shane Willis, CAR 91 (1-2-3-13-13)
6. Colin White, N.J. 56 (0-3-4-2-9)
7. Marian Gaborik, MIN 49 (0-2-2-5-10)
8. Daniel Sedin, VAN 19 (0-0-1-2-8)
9. Roberto Luongo, FLA 18 (0-0-3-1-0)
10. Steve Reinprecht, L.A.-COL 12 (0-0-1-2-1)
11. Marty Turco, DAL 8 (0-0-1-1-0)
12. Brent Johnson, STL 8 (0-0-0-2-2)
13. Karel Rachunek, OTT 2 (0-0-0-0-2)
David Vyborny, CBJ 2 (0-0-0-0-2)
15. Dimitri Kalinin, BUF 1 (0-0-0-0-1)
Ossi Vaananen, PHX 1 (0-0-0-0-1)

2000-2001 Lady Byng

1. Joe Sakic, COL 312 (15-18-5-3-2)
2. Nicklas Lidstrom, DET 308 (21-7-7-4-2)
3. Adam Oates, WSH 195 (7-7-13-3-2)
4. Brett Hull, DAL 110 (2-3-9-6-6)
5. Zigmund Palffy, L.A. 95 (2-4-4-8-3)
6. Paul Kariya, ANA 89 (4-3-2-5-3)
7. Ron Francis, CAR 81 (5-0-4-3-2)
8. Mario Lemieux, PIT 66 (2-3-3-2-4)
9. Sergei Samsonov, BOS 27 (0-1-3-1-2)
10. Steve Yzerman, DET 26 (0-2-0-4-0)
11. Teemu Selanne, ANA-S.J. 25 (0-3-0-1-1)
12. Alexei Yashin, OTT 24 (0-2-1-0-5)
13. Pierre Turgeon, STL 24 (0-1-0-5-2)
14. Simon Gagne, PHI 17 (0-0-2-1-4)
15. Martin Straka, PIT 16 (0-0-2-2-0)
16. John Madden, N.J. 15 (0-2-0-0-1)
17. Sergei Berezin, TOR 15 (0-1-1-1-0)
18. Radek Dvorak, NYR 13 (1-0-0-1-0)
Niklas Sundstrom, S.J. 13 (1-0-0-1-0)
20. Mike Modano, DAL 13 (1-0-0-0-3)
21. Daniel Alfredsson, OTT 11 (0-0-1-2-0)
22. Mark Recchi, PHI 10 (1-0-0-0-0)
23. Robert Lang, PIT 8 (0-1-0-0-1)
24. Pavol Demitra, STL 8 (0-0-1-1-0)
25. Ray Bourque, COL 7 (0-1-0-0-0)
Patrik Elias, N.J. 7 (0-1-0-0-0)
Igor Larionov, FLA-DET 7 (0-1-0-0-0)
Alexander Mogilny, N.J. 7 (0-1-0-0-0)
29. Eric Daze, CHI 6 (0-0-1-0-1)
Jozef Stumpel, L.A. 6 (0-0-1-0-1)
31. Brad Richards, T.B. 6 (0-0-0-2-0)
32. Peter Forsberg, COL 5 (0-0-1-0-0)
Sergei Zubov, DAL 5 (0-0-1-0-0)
34. Patric Kjellberg, NSH 5 (0-0-0-1-2)
Brian Leetch, NYR 5 (0-0-0-1-2)
Luc Robitaille, L.A. 5 (0-0-0-1-2)
37. Sergei Fedorov, DET 3 (0-0-0-1-0)
Ray Ferraro, ATL 3 (0-0-0-1-0)
Sami Kapanen, CAR 3 (0-0-0-1-0)
40. Andrew Cassels, VAN 2 (0-0-0-0-2)
Ulf Dahlen, WSH 2 (0-0-0-0-2)
42. Tony Amonte, CHI 1 (0-0-0-0-1)
Milan Hejduk, COL 1 (0-0-0-0-1)
Viktor Kozlov, FLA 1 (0-0-0-0-1)
Patrick Lalime, OTT 1 (0-0-0-0-1)
Brian Rafalski, N.J. 1 (0-0-0-0-1)
Petr Sykora, N.J. 1 (0-0-0-0-1)
Scott Young, STL 1 (0-0-0-0-1)

2000-2001 Adams

1. Bill Barber, PHI 125 (17-11-7)
2. Scotty Bowman, DET 95 (14-6-7)
3. Jacques Martin, OTT 92 (10-13-3)
4. Larry Robinson, N.J. 83 (11-7-7)
5. Bob Hartley, COL 59 (5-10-4)
6. Craig MacTavish, EDM 53 (4-8-9)
7. Ken Hitchcock, DAL 29 (4-2-3)
8. Marc Crawford, VAN 24 (1-4-7)
9. Andy Murray, L.A. 18 (3-0-3)
10. Lindy Ruff, BUF 17 (0-4-5)
11. Darryl Sutter, S.J. 13 (2-1-0)
12. Jacques Lemaire, MIN 11 (0-2-5)
13. Joel Quenneville, STL 10 (2-0-0)
14. Barry Trotz, NSH 9 (0-1-6)
15. Ron Wilson, WSH 7 (0-1-4)
16. Paul Maurice, CAR 6 (0-2-0)
17. Mike Keenan, BOS 3 (0-1-0)
18. Dave King, CBJ 3 (0-0-3)

2000-2001 NHL ALL-STAR TEAM

CENTER

1. Joe Sakic, COL 291 (54-7-0)
2. Mario Lemieux, PIT 112 (7-23-8)
3. Doug Weight, EDM 34 (0-8-10)
4. Mike Modano, DAL 28 (0-6-10)
5. Jason Allison, BOS 23 (0-4-11)
6. Peter Forsberg, COL 22 (0-5-7)
7. Alexei Yashin, OTT 14 (0-2-8)
8. Martin Straka, PIT 13 (0-3-4)
9. Sergei Fedorov, DET 6 (0-2-0)
10. Keith Primeau, PHI 3 (0-1-0)
11. Adam Oates, WSH 2 (0-0-2)
12. Petr Sykora, N.J. 1 (0-0-1)

RIGHT WING

1. Jaromir Jagr, PIT 293 (55-6-0)
2. Pavel Bure, FLA 137 (5-33-13)
3. Alexei Kovalev, PIT 60 (0-14-18)
4. Zigmund Palffy, L.A. 13 (0-1-10)
5. Bill Guerin, EDM-BOS 12 (0-2-6)
6. Peter Bondra, WSH 9 (0-1-6)
7. Mark Recchi, PHI 8 (1-1-0)
8. Milan Hejduk, COL 5 (0-1-2)
Brett Hull, DAL 5 (0-1-2)
10. Alexander Mogilny, N.J. 4 (0-0-4)
11. Petr Sykora, N.J. 3 (0-1-0)

LEFT WING

1. Patrik Elias, N.J. 280 (51-8-1)
2. Luc Robitaille, L.A. 80 (0-21-17)
3. Markus Naslund, VAN 78 (5-16-5)
4. Keith Tkachuk, PHX-STL 33 (1-4-16)
5. Martin Straka, PIT 27 (4-2-1)
6. Brendan Shanahan, DET 23 (0-5-8)
7. Alex Tanguay, COL 8 (0-2-2)
8. Paul Kariya, ANA 5 (0-0-5)
9. Peter Bondra, WSH 3 (0-1-0)
Pavel Bure, FLA 3 (0-1-0)
Fredrik Modin, T.B. 3 (0-1-0)
12. Bill Guerin, EDM-BOS 1 (0-0-1)
Marian Hossa, OTT 1 (0-0-1)
Alexander Mogilny, N.J. 1 (0-0-1)
Zigmund Palffy, L.A. 1 (0-0-1)
Gary Roberts, TOR 1 (0-0-1)
Ryan Smyth, EDM 1 (0-0-1)

DEFENSE

1. Nicklas Lidstrom, DET 282 (53-5-2)
2. Ray Bourque, COL 169 (18-23-10)
3. Rob Blake, L.A.-COL 151 (15-22-10)
4. Scott Stevens, N.J. 133 (17-14-6)
5. Brian Leetch, NYR 112 (10-14-20)
6. Sergei Gonchar, WSH 68 (1-15-18)
7. Al MacInnis, STL 39 (3-5-9)
8. Sergei Zubov, DAL 35 (1-8-6)
9. Brian Rafalski, N.J. 30 (2-5-5)
10. Chris Pronger, STL 27 (1-5-7)
11. Wade Redden, OTT 14 (0-3-5)
12. Ed Jovanovski, VAN 10 (0-1-7)
13. Eric Desjardins, PHI 5 (1-0-0)
14. Derian Hatcher, DAL 5 (0-1-2)
15. Dan McGillis, PHI 4 (0-0-4)
16. Scott Niedermayer, N.J. 3 (0-0-3)
17. Oleg Tverdovsky, ANA 2 (0-0-2)
18. Darius Kasparaitis, PIT 1 (0-0-1)
Brad Lukowich, DAL 1 (0-0-1)
Janne Niinimaa, EDM 1 (0-0-1)
Teppo Numminen, PHX 1 (0-0-1)
Jason Smith, EDM 1 (0-0-1)
Lubomir Visnovsky, L.A. 1 (0-0-1)

GOALTENDER

1. Dominik Hasek, BUF 160 (19-18-11)
2. Roman Cechmanek, PHI 154 (19-17-8)
3. Martin Brodeur, N.J. 143 (18-15-8)
4. Patrick Roy, COL 46 (3-7-10)
5. Sean Burke, PHX 20 (2-1-7)
6. Evgeni Nabokov, S.J. 9 (0-1-6)
7. Patrick Lalime, OTT 6 (0-2-0)
8. Ed Belfour, DAL 2 (0-0-2)
Manny Fernandez, MIN 2 (0-0-2)
Olaf Kolzig, WSH 2 (0-0-2)
Tommy Salo, EDM 2 (0-0-2)
12. Arturs Irbe, CAR 1 (0-0-1)
Felix Potvin, VAN-L.A. 1 (0-0-1)
Ron Tugnutt, CBJ 1 (0-0-1)

I thought the voting in 2001 was ridiculous. Lemieux scored at a great pace but he only played 43 games, the rest of the season he was useless. Hell in 1990 he misses just 20 games and gets half the amount fo votes.

Hasek and Bure were pretty much 1 man shows this season, I think they deserved more votes. I mean Sakic had an awesome season but that team was full of stars.

 

[Dark Shadows]

I thought the voting in 2001 was ridiculous. Lemieux scored at a great pace but he only played 43 games, the rest of the season he was useless. Hell in 1990 he misses just 20 games and gets half the amount fo votes.

Hasek and Bure were pretty much 1 man shows this season, I think they deserved more votes. I mean Sakic had an awesome season but that team was full of stars.

People had stars in their eyes when Lemieux made his comeback because of the incredible change in fortunes he was so obviously responsible for in both the team and Jagr. Without Lemieux Jagr finishes with under 100 points and the Pens might not even make the playoffs.

and Uh, Sakic carried the Avs that season. For the last time, it does not matter if a team is full of stars or not. Stop trying to devalue the players. Without Sakic, that team does not go where it went.


There is no way, shape or form that Hasek or Bure deserved it more. Bure is still a one dimensional selfish player who it did not matter who his linemates were, he was putting up a set number of points, and Hasek was not his best that year, and Buffalo had the same very good defensive team in front of him as usual.

Sakic had a two way season of epic value, and deserved the Hart.

 

[canucks4ever]

People had stars in their eyes when Lemieux made his comeback because of the incredible change in fortunes he was so obviously responsible for in both the team and Jagr. Without Lemieux Jagr finishes with under 100 points and the Pens might not even make the playoffs.

and Uh, Sakic carried the Avs that season. For the last time, it does not matter if a team is full of stars or not. Stop trying to devalue the players. Without Sakic, that team does not go where it went.


There is no way, shape or form that Hasek or Bure deserved it more. Bure is still a one dimensional selfish player who it did not matter who his linemates were, he was putting up a set number of points, and Hasek was not his best that year, and Buffalo had the same very good defensive team in front of him as usual.

Sakic had a two way season of epic value, and deserved the Hart.

Hasek had the better overall season than Lemieux ok, I dont care you are wrong. Lemeiux won the art ross in 1992 and played 64 games and he didnt end up as the runner up. If you miss the first 3 months of the season, you shouldn't be a hart trophy nominee. Even if Hasek wasn't at his best, he was still the best goalie and his team didn't have one player that was even top 50 in scoring, yet they ended up with the 4th best record in the east.

 

[Dark Shadows]

Hasek had the better overall season than Lemieux ok, I dont care you are wrong. Lemeiux won the art ross in 1992 and played 64 games and he didnt end up as the runner up. If you miss the first 3 months of the season, you shouldn't be a hart trophy nominee. Even if Hasek wasn't at his best, he was still the best goalie and his team didn't have one player that was even top 50 in scoring, yet they ended up with the 4th best record in the east.

Than Lemieux? Sure. Ill buy that. Like I said, the voters were starry eyed about him due to his comeback and the impact he made on a losing pens team and Jagr's scoring.

My beef with your "He was on a stacked team" line is Sakic, because Sakic was the man, team or no team.

But Sakic had a better year than Hasek. You can harp about Hasek's team all you want, but the fact of the matter is, they were one of the better defensive teams in the league. Them not having a top scorer is irrelevant to their style. They were a team that tried to beat you by a single goal and yes, Hasek was their franchise player. But it is a lie to say they were a terrible team carried by Hasek. They were excellent defensively.

 

[canucks4ever]

Than Lemieux? Sure. Ill buy that. Like I said, the voters were starry eyed about him due to his comeback and the impact he made on a losing pens team and Jagr's scoring.

My beef with your "He was on a stacked team" line is Sakic, because Sakic was the man, team or no team.

But Sakic had a better year than Hasek. You can harp about Hasek's team all you want, but the fact of the matter is, they were one of the better defensive teams in the league. Them not having a top scorer is irrelevant to their style. They were a team that tried to beat you by a single goal and yes, Hasek was their franchise player. But it is a lie to say they were a terrible team carried by Hasek. They were excellent defensively.

I never disputed the fact that Sakic didn't deserve his trophy, I just said Bure and Hasek should have been given more votes and lemieux shoudlnt have been runner-up based on half a season.

 

[Dark Shadows]

I thought the voting in 2001 was ridiculous. Lemieux scored at a great pace but he only played 43 games, the rest of the season he was useless. Hell in 1990 he misses just 20 games and gets half the amount fo votes.

Hasek and Bure were pretty much 1 man shows this season, I think they deserved more votes. I mean Sakic had an awesome season but that team was full of stars.

I never disputed the fact that Sakic didn't deserve his trophy, I just said Bure and Hasek should have been given more votes and lemieux shoudlnt have been runner-up based on half a season.

You tried to take credit away from Sakic by saying he was on a great team, when in fact, he was a head and shoulders above anyone on that team that year.

Hasek and Bure were pretty much 1 man shows this season, I think they deserved more votes. I mean Sakic had an awesome season but that team was full of stars.

 

[pitseleh]

I came across a more complete Hart voting for 1926.

Nels Stewart 88
Sprague Cleghorn 75
Frank Nighbor 68
Roy Worters 44
Reginald (Hooley) Smith 44
Howie Morenz 34
Jimmy Herberts 33
King Clancy 28
Charles Stewart 24
Lionel Conacher 24
Billy Burch 18
Reg Noble 14
Bert McCaffrey 13
Babe Siebert 12

 

[Macke*]

Maybe not be history, but does anyone know where I can find the voting results for the past two seasons?