WinterLion
Registered User
- Oct 1, 2017
- 5,261
- 5,258
Hey all! I know this is a very hard thing to do and very subjective, but have there been any recent attempts to rank teams prospect depth? Or under 23 players?
Kings, bare last.
That's one already.
I'm of the crowd thinks that Vancouver is barely in the top 5. There are cases for quite a few teams to be up there.Canucks and Philly top of the pile
I feel like we’re already top 10I'd say Rangers moved up to slightly lover than middle of the pack - maybe 17-19?
A couple of good pieces. Big improvement considering where we were 2 years ago.
Canucks and Philly top of the pile
I'm of the crowd thinks that Vancouver is barely in the top 5. There are cases for quite a few teams to be up there.
Philly though, absolutely deserves to be up there.
I'm of the crowd thinks that Vancouver is barely in the top 5. There are cases for quite a few teams to be up there.
Philly though, absolutely deserves to be up there.
Is this a prospect ranking? Or U-23 and under ranking? Very different things.
Liked how you snuck the Blues in there like we wouldnt noticeARZ,PHI, LVK, MIN,FLA,VAN,STL,NYR, ANA(low key good) off the top of my head. No particular order.
I’d be hard pressed to not put STL in the top 10: some high end Fwds, two possible high end D and a High end G w/ some promising specs who’ve been producing. This isn’t exact order but relatively from highest to lowest quality IMO minus goalies at the bottom.
Robert Thomas
Vince Dunn
Jordan Kyrou
Klim Kostin
Tage Thompson
Erik Foley
Jake Walman
Jordan Schmaltz
Nolan Stevens
Niko Mikkola
Adam Musil
Tanner Kaspick
Alexei Toropchenko
David Noel
Austin Poganski
Ville Husso(G)
Evan Fitzpatrick(G
Was my first thought too. But the question is one of depth and I don't think Vancouver has much depth. Talent at the top end is very good and in the argument for best overall. But our depth is still junk. Just look at our D prospect. Juolevi and ....