ThreeOfAPerfectPair
Registered User
OTT: Draisatl
EDM: Subban
NSH: Extended EK
If ek doesn't re-up with Ottawa.
lol, Ottawa fans need to give up the delusion of being able to trade an extended Karlsson.
OTT: Draisatl
EDM: Subban
NSH: Extended EK
If ek doesn't re-up with Ottawa.
I'll never understand why they would trade him. Makes absolutely no sense. Just like it made no sense for Montreal to trade him.
OTT: Draisatl
EDM: Subban
NSH: Extended EK
If ek doesn't re-up with Ottawa.
OTT: Draisatl
EDM: Subban
NSH: Extended EK
If ek doesn't re-up with Ottawa.
I'll never understand why they would trade him. Makes absolutely no sense. Just like it made no sense for Montreal to trade him.
lol, Ottawa fans need to give up the delusion of being able to trade an extended Karlsson.
There was a Montreal media guy saying the exact same thing like a month ago. Subban rubbing teammates the wrong way, and if the right deal comes along he'd be moved. Jesus, how annoying can one player be?
Spitballing here, maybe they're thinking about moving him to make room for Tavares?
This. If they do move Subban, Tavares (or someone of similar quality) better be coming to Nashville or else it’s just a step back.Spitballing here, maybe they're thinking about moving him to make room for Tavares?
Ekholm????Maybe, but they would need to move Turris as well to make room for Ellis to set-up, otherwise you're looking at running with 2 good d instead of 4
But I think the question here is: would Subban sign here again as UFA? Likely not.I have a hard time believing these rumors are true. Subban was our best d-man for the playoffs and a lot of the season, and he's already on a long-term contract. If a d-man must be moved, moving Ellis would be much more logical IMO.
Oilers would be all over this.
OTT: Draisatl
EDM: Subban
NSH: Extended EK
If ek doesn't re-up with Ottawa.
I have a hard time believing these rumors are true. Subban was our best d-man for the playoffs and a lot of the season, and he's already on a long-term contract. If a d-man must be moved, moving Ellis would be much more logical IMO.
Ekholm????
But I think the question here is: would Subban sign here again as UFA? Likely not.
Ellis wants to spend his career here.
I totally agree with that, but if there’s any merit to him wearing out his welcome, I’d rather move him than Ellis. Long term, man. Long term.It'd be pretty dumb if we got rid of a Norris-caliber d-man just because he wouldn't sign here as a UFA. I like Ellis, but I think Subban is better by a good margin.
If we traded Subban, we’d still have Josi, Ellis, and Ekholm. Not just 2 good D. Ekholm would be a top pairing D man on almost any team in the league. Dude is a stud.Depends on the reason behind moving him. If it's to free up cap, then Subban, regardless of how illogical it seems, is the best choice. Ellis only frees 2.5/prevents you from adding an additional 4-4.5 if extended/re-signed
If you mean which d left, then Ekholm and Josi.
If you mean move him, he's 4 mill for the next 4 years (?) That's a sweet contract.