Phantoms' Travis Sanheim-Philippe Myers pairing can't be trusted with Flyers ... yet
Of course this is a johnk article. I don't even know where to begin, so cue the music, Johnny:
He takes a dig at analytics while simultaneously getting to the essence of it. And then proceeding to ignore Myers has been one of the best Phantoms players in doing this this season. And Sanheim the best Flyer. But of course he doesn't know that. He just watched this one (bad) game and figured it all out.
Oh, I bet.
Competition BETWEEN them?! What the **** kind of chemicals are in that hair gel.
Boruk got absolutely roasted on Twitter for that article.
So are we saying age 23 is when we give up on prospects? Since people seems to despise Hagg haha. He obviously won't grow or improve his game in anyway.
I don't see what's wrong with Boruk's article. I appreciate an article that is willing to report a bad game instead of just blowing smoke.
I didn't get to watch the game, but I want to know how the team's top prospects did -- good or bad. And it sounds like Sanheim had a couple brutal errors. There's nothing wrong with reporting that. An article isn't bad just because it reports things people don't want to hear or don't want to believe is true. And even in the article Boruk says to chalk it up just to one bad game. But his point rings true that Sanheim will have to clean up the bad turnovers if he wants to get more minutes in the NHL.
Hakstol is literally the only person who ever saw Hagg and Morin play and said, "Yeah, I'll take the guy who sucks."
I think fans are overreacting, as they tend to be defensive and overprotective of the team's high-profile prospects.The issue isn’t reporting a bad game - it’s reporting a bad game and acting like that it’s been that way the whole season. It’s reporting a bad game and acting like that’s why they can’t be NHL defensemen (as if NHL defensemen don’t have bad games). Also, as already pointed out, to be able to try to rip analytics and then use them to try to make a point in the same sentence is just epically stupid. What was wrong with the article wasn’t reporting them having a bad game - it was literally everything else.
The problem with adding anyone who is an real upgrade is going to cost huge dollars and term. you are bidding against 50% of the teams teams, Kane who i hate got 7 mil for 7 years omg what is a real upgrade going to cost . If you get mild upgrades you are just blocking kids from coming up and most on here don't get that , you add an mid caliber D man Myers or Sanheim or would have Morin will not all be here which happens to be what most people on here want. I go back to, i want to be patient but i want to win now , I want the rookies here now but i want significant players added in free agency . You can't have both that's the reality no matter how much you want it. Do you really think Hextall is a moron , hey i'll go sign Tavares the add Carlson then Doughty then for ****s and giggles: Karllson and then i phone LA and see if they will give me Quick next to nothing cause we need him more than they do. Oh yea Mr Betmen Philly's Cap is now 100 mil cause we need it so we can win now and what's that , naa screw the other 30 teams it's all about us.. Like really, some of you guys just don't get the business side of hockey at all . Sorry for the rant
As has been repeated 1000 times....
Hagg is a waste of time because he also sucked in the AHL. This isn’t a player who was great at lower levels and is taking some time to adjust. He just legitmately sucked and it’s not reasonable to expect him to become good at things in the NHL when he can’t even do it against weak competition in the AHL. Age is irrelevant when the problem is simply skill and smarts.
Thank you. The Hagg hate on here is ridiculous. He had a very good rookie year. Solid on D. Only physical presence after Gudas, who turned into a putty-tat after his suspension. Big strong kid who skates well and can defend big and/or fast players.Hagg is fine as a stay at home D. Was just his rookie year and he can still become more steady and he adds a needed physical element. Not every D needs to play like Gost in order to be effective.
Thank you. The Hagg hate on here is ridiculous. He had a very good rookie year. Solid on D. Only physical presence after Gudas, who turned into a putty-tat after his suspension. Big strong kid who skates well and can defend big and/or fast players.