- Aug 22, 2006
- 60,357
- 16,859
Seems high now because of the current cap situation. In a couple of years as the cap starts rising. This has the potential to be an incredible deal for the Sens.
and like i said in the original post if you keep handing out 8 milion dollar contracts youre going to have complete utter lack of depth eslwhere in the lineup.True, though I don't think that really holds water in Ottawa's case. The problem wasn't the top line or Chabot's pairing, it was a complete and utter lack of depth anywhere else in the lineup.
Backwards thinking.
You should pay for future performance. Not past performance.
Except JT MillerYOU GET AN 8X8. YOU GET AN 8X8 . EVERYONE GETS AN 8X8
Nah, I saw plenty of his play and progress last year. What you’re saying may well happen, but this isn’t a great deal until Stutzle proves he’s an upper echelon forward. He’s definitely well on the way, but there’s still risk here for the team.
Cap will go up big time too though. It all coincides perfectly to when the prediction of a cap increase is.and like i said in the original post if you keep handing out 8 milion dollar contracts youre going to have complete utter lack of depth eslwhere in the lineup.
Of course, but you can only predict future performance based on past performance.
The thing is, there's risk with 98% of signings. There are a tiny minority of players that are close to risk-free (McDavid, Makar, Matthews), but with everyone else, it's next to impossible to remove all risk.
Look at these 3, very different, signings:
Stützle at 8x8.35M.
Miller at 7x8M.
Sergachev at 8x8.5M.
All players at different stages of their careers, with different levels of having "proven it"... yet all have risks associated with them.
I’m honestly surprised Stutzle signed this. I think long term he’s left a lot of money on the table.
everybody getting 8 million in ottawa. they gonna be paper thin on depth.
The thing is, there's risk with 98% of signings. There are a tiny minority of players that are close to risk-free (McDavid, Makar, Matthews), but with everyone else, it's next to impossible to remove all risk.
Look at these 3, very different, signings:
Stützle at 8x8.35M.
Miller at 7x8M.
Sergachev at 8x8.5M.
All players at different stages of their careers, with different levels of having "proven it"... yet all have risks associated with them.
The better player more often than not gets the better deal.LOL at him getting more than Suzuki!
Still, good deal.
I think the biggest difference is that Miller and Sergachev didn't have RFA years anymore. With Stutzle, you are paying a premium for RFA years, which we rarely see - Marner is a recent example.
What an overpayment