OPPF Draft 2021 - Draft Thread

ChiTownPhilly

Not Too Soft
Feb 23, 2010
2,104
1,391
AnyWorld/I'mWelcomeTo
Thanks for posting those @ChiTownPhilly, a far less predictable draft than the main one in terms of position. It does seem that some players are slotting into a usual position, but a run on one of the original six teams easily throws everything outta wack.

Robinson was the guy I targeted with my Montreal pick from the get go, took him way earlier than I had expected/wanted to, but had to. Still very pleased even at 68. Otherwise it was wait till the end for Henri Richard.

I knew it was getting close for Keon, but still thought he'd make it to my next pick when I'd scoop him up.

Really thought I would get Yzerman later than he went, very pleased to get Sawchuk as a consolation though, I knew when @VanIslander said he'd be picking between the two I'd take the other (needed to grab Robinson first of course). Love the depth on the team though, would have been very happy with a Fedorov, Abel, Delvecchio, Datsyuk, Zetterberg later anyway.
And thank YOU (and Van). I like it when people post their draft-thoughts. I have a feeling that some guard their draft strategies with the zeal that the ancients attached to the preservation of the Eleusinian Mysteries- which is their right- but I think that if we want the project to grow, conversations like this help us appear more human and approachable than we would if we were simply trying to hunker down in this pursuit. [This is also really my oblique way of saying- @Professor What , @Habsfan18 , @nabby12 ... hope you don't TOTALLY give up on us(!)]

If you weren't taking Sawchuk at 73, I was going to- at slot 75. Once I missed out on that Goaltender Rescue Pod, I thought, "well, it looks like I'll get to burnish all of my old 'Goaltenders don't matter as much as you think they do' arguments, buttressed by statistics (that seem to be frequently ignored) in support of that perspective." At least no-one can accuse me of drafting cynically---

Losing out on Schmidt was the most crushing part of the draft for me lol as I figured I could wait since almost everyone at that point had locked in two centers so I was safe for a bit longer. Little did I know that people would start on their third center before I had my first. Bergeron is probably the pick I would take back if I had to do it again, though it seemed to work out teamwise. I had sent a list with Hossa first and Kasatonov second, before quickly changing it to Bergeron, I guess I didn't want to be burned anymore on losing out on another center. I also gave great thought to taking Oates, until I took Modano to be the Hulls center.
One of my great miscalculations of Main ATD-2021 was that I thought I could wait on scoring-line Centers, as I watched fellow participants take 1-2-3 Offensive Centermen while I waited to pick up my second. A key theme in the evolution of Main-ATD is the long-day's-journey-into-night of the conventional #3 checking line. What has been happening instead is that If you have three Centers, one of which can be framed as a '200-foot-player,' then THAT sort of Center gets used as part of one's depth plan. And if that construct is on the wane THERE, then over here, where the talent-pool is less-than-half as deep, it's pretty much :deadhorse.
Super happy to get Leetch, always part of the plan, got him at a good time too. I'd have taken him earlier had I not needed to get Robinson and Sawchuk at 68 and 73.
Fine value on Leetch, who's never been picked lower (in the 10-12 team era). I gave moderate thought to Leetch at 75, opting instead to picking up Salming at slot 75, higher than he's ever been picked before. {He was one of five players I took, who'd never been picked higher. I had eight who'd never been picked lower.} I felt like Salming could absorb the minutes demands of being Bourque's partner a little bit more easily than Leetch. Why not Gadsby? Well- I had Gadsby last year. Plus, he CAN be something of a Penalty Magnet...
I'd eyed Sakic for the 4th round but he went in the 3rd round, so I took Yzerman later, in the 7th round.
I took Sakic at 26. He was one of the eight O.G.s who had never been taken lower. Just my opinion- if I hadn't taken him at 26, you would have had to take him at 27 if you really wanted him. I don't think he would have lasted to the come-back at pick 34.

You did get Yzerman at a fair price, I think...
 
Last edited:

VanIslander

A 19-year ATDer on HfBoards
Sep 4, 2004
35,266
6,477
South Korea
No.

I had King Clancy LOCKED & LOADED at 27th. The chance to get a THIRD top-10 defenseman (based on the recent HOH top-100 player project) in a 10-team draft - and only burn Otrawa - SOLIDIFIED the trio core a Bowman would want (a la his Habs dynasty).
 

ChiTownPhilly

Not Too Soft
Feb 23, 2010
2,104
1,391
AnyWorld/I'mWelcomeTo
No.

I had King Clancy LOCKED & LOADED at 27th. The chance to get a THIRD top-10 defenseman (based on the recent HOH top-100 player project) in a 10-team draft - and only burn Otrawa - SOLIDIFIED the trio core a Bowman would want (a la his Habs dynasty).
I've said before that Clancy adds value in a 20-player draft, since he'll just NEVER be out of the lineup. Whether or not Clancy at 27 is an overpay is something that would have to be left to the honesty of other respondents. I don't think @tabness was going to take him. I don't think @Hawkey Town 18 was going to take him. (I think he was dialed into getting a RHS-RD at that time.) Would @zffssk have taken him? Maybe(?) I can understand you feeling that it wasn't worth taking that chance.

I think Clancy would have lasted to 34- but BenchBrawl can prove me wrong, if he says he would have snagged Clancy at 29 or 32. BB's pick of Kelly at 29 looks like the best move on-the-board for him... and it looks like his heart was all-in on Rocket at 32.
 

BenchBrawl

Registered User
Jul 26, 2010
30,880
13,672
Fellas, I had a busy week but I'm finally freed from this pile of tedious obligations. I shall assassinate some teams this week-end, as well as respond to some of the commentary in this thread.
 

BenchBrawl

Registered User
Jul 26, 2010
30,880
13,672
I think Clancy would have lasted to 34- but BenchBrawl can prove me wrong, if he says he would have snagged Clancy at 29 or 32. BB's pick of Kelly at 29 looks like the best move on-the-board for him... and it looks like his heart was all-in on Rocket at 32.

With Kelly there, Clancy wasn't part of my plan on this set of picks.

That said I have nothing but love for Clancy the player, a glorious playoff performer.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ChiTownPhilly

ChiTownPhilly

Not Too Soft
Feb 23, 2010
2,104
1,391
AnyWorld/I'mWelcomeTo
Back in the USSR!
Soviet Union: Now-and-Then
[All the USSR cards were played this year.]

Player2021202020192018
Fetisov7151822
Kharlamov38485641
Makarov40373045
Firsov50596985
Tretiak62524043
Vasiliev7690101110
Mikhailov84988287
Krutov106136120167
Kasatonov128116134184
Lutchenko209NDNDND
MaltsevND185NDND
BalderisND198ND162
PetrovNDND194240
YakushevNDNDND197
[TBODY] [/TBODY]
Fetisov in the Opening Round is a first. Kharlamov, Firsov, AND Krutov were all taken higher-than-ever, which (as much as anything) shows how the demand-curve for LWs bent this year. Vasiliev goes in the 8th Round again- but this time it costs pick 76 instead of pick 90.

After a fashion, I was as surprised by the last Soviet pick as I was by the first one.
 

The Macho King

Back* to Back** World Champion
Jun 22, 2011
48,760
29,266
So some draft thoughts.

First - holy shit Jacques Plante did not get drafted. When I drafted Hall, I as thinking I had a good chance at either Hall - Robinson or Hall - Lafleur, so I didn't burn my Montreal pick (my alternative plan was Plante - Chelios, which in hindsight would have been a bit better). I'm obviously very happy with Hall - I think team circumstances put him and Plante in the same tier so it's not like I am hurting, but if I knew then what I know now, I would have gladly burned my Montreal pick there, or gone the other way with grabbing Lafleur or Robinson.

This draft was amazing for how the Montreal meta changed. Basically we had the same thing where in the first few rounds few were touched, but when it went off, holy shit did it go off.

And seriously - Jacques Plante was not picked. Just amazing.
 

VanIslander

A 19-year ATDer on HfBoards
Sep 4, 2004
35,266
6,477
South Korea
Thank you ChiTownPhilly for the respect.

Laval built Fetisov, HARVEY, Clancy ... as the #1 trios for a reason, backed up with the ability to handle any size/muscle with Chara, Conacher.

Surprise? ... this ain't no Kharlamov, Dionne,
 

TheDevilMadeMe

Registered User
Aug 28, 2006
52,271
6,981
Brooklyn
If anyone else has been having trouble accessing the site on desktop (while being fine on mobile), try typing hfboards.mandatory.com. Just hfboards.com no longer seems to work.
 

VanIslander

A 19-year ATDer on HfBoards
Sep 4, 2004
35,266
6,477
South Korea
Maltsev should have been at least the 10th Soviet drafted.

It's hard to see Recchi, Martinec and Hextall Sr. in top-6 roles and Maltsev undrafted.

Such is the logic of the OPPF draft.
 

ChiTownPhilly

Not Too Soft
Feb 23, 2010
2,104
1,391
AnyWorld/I'mWelcomeTo
Thank you ChiTownPhilly for the respect.
It WAS fun to go hammer-and-tongs with you in the quest to accumulate the League's best BlueLiners- made more interesting by the fact that we held consecutive draft positions. Ultimately (if judging by talent), I'd say you carried the day- but I think I was in-the-ballpark:

Defenceman/HoH Top 100 ranking qua defencemen...

Harvey=2
Bourque=3
Potvin=7
Fetisov=8
Clancy=11
Salming=22
Chara=23
Keith=25
 

ChiTownPhilly

Not Too Soft
Feb 23, 2010
2,104
1,391
AnyWorld/I'mWelcomeTo
Pre-NHL: Now & Then-

Player2021202020192018
S. Cleghorn44475825
F. (C) Taylor45425351
Phillips79788679
Malone87152151131
T.E. (M) Johnson120105117132
Foyston13011712195
Fredrickson138250NDND
W.H. (H) Stuart14985119124
J. Walker168NDNDND
Lehman195NDNDND
L. PatrickND193200150
George HayND245NDND
Art DuncanNDND225225
H. GardinerNDNDND135
Art RossNDNDND212
[TBODY] [/TBODY]
There's an escarpment here, too- perhaps no less pronounced than that of Chicago. If you haven't played your pre-NHL card by the time of Foyston (or Malone in years before this one), you're using this well for depth-components, or you're not drawing from it at all.


 

VanIslander

A 19-year ATDer on HfBoards
Sep 4, 2004
35,266
6,477
South Korea
What are the two picks you missed out on, would've certainly drafted next, were stolen just before you?

Hextall, Sr.
Fleury.
 
Last edited:

BenchBrawl

Registered User
Jul 26, 2010
30,880
13,672
Pre-NHL: Now & Then-

Player2021202020192018
S. Cleghorn44475825
F. (C) Taylor45425351
Phillips79788679
Malone87152151131
T.E. (M) Johnson120105117132
Foyston13011712195
Fredrickson138250NDND
W.H. (H) Stuart14985119124
J. Walker168NDNDND
Lehman195NDNDND
L. PatrickND193200150
George HayND245NDND
Art DuncanNDND225225
H. GardinerNDNDND135
Art RossNDNDND212
[TBODY] [/TBODY]
There's an escarpment here, too- perhaps no less pronounced than that of Chicago. If you haven't played your pre-NHL card by the time of Foyston (or Malone in years before this one), you're using this well for depth-components, or you're not drawing from it at all.

You draw the line at Foyston and claim the rest is mere depth, but Hod Stuart was ranked over both Foyston and Moose Johnson in the Top 200 Project, and just in general is considered higher on the all-time scale. The 1925 MacLean's article also speaks volume of his reputation in the 1920's, especially compared to Moose. The way I see it, I got him at a bargain.
 

Hawkey Town 18

Registered User
Jun 29, 2009
8,251
1,643
Chicago, IL
What are the two picks you missed out on, would've certainly drafted next, were stolen just before you?

Hextall, Sr.
Fleury.

Red Kelly
Larry Robinson
(Although prob wouldn’t have targeted Robinson had I got Kelly)

Edit: also was looking at Morenz and Lafleur, I was banking on at least one of those 3 making it to my next pick and none did
 

ChiTownPhilly

Not Too Soft
Feb 23, 2010
2,104
1,391
AnyWorld/I'mWelcomeTo
You draw the line at Foyston and claim the rest is mere depth, but Hod Stuart was ranked over both Foyston and Moose Johnson in the Top 200 Project, and just in general is considered higher on the all-time scale. The 1925 MacLean's article also speaks volume of his reputation in the 1920's, especially compared to Moose. The way I see it, I got him at a bargain.
Yeah- upon reflection, you're probably right.
Hod Stuart is a deluxe 3rd pairing D this year. However, he's NOT the MOST deluxe, nor the second-most deluxe, nor the third most deluxe.
Larry Robinson... also was looking at Morenz and Lafleur, I was banking on at least one of those 3 making it to my next pick and none did
Thank you for confirming- if I got too-clever-by-half and tried to play the waiting-game one more Round on Morenz, I would have wound up donning Wile E. Coyote make-up. [Although the door to Plante would gave remained open to me.]

 

tabness

be a playa
Apr 4, 2014
2,006
3,540
Jack Walker (also Eddie Carpenter although in his case much shorter/injury plagued career generally mean he isn't getting many looks) seem to be clearly considered right up there with Foyston in his MVP season in terms of Seattle's best as well.
 

ChiTownPhilly

Not Too Soft
Feb 23, 2010
2,104
1,391
AnyWorld/I'mWelcomeTo
Coaches- Now & Then [Last one of these until voting begins]

Coach2021202020192018
Bowman107162122105
L. Patrick131167155143
T. Blake141166103139
Arbour143169153151
Sather153202169209
Irvin156NDND196
Ivan162196197164
Shero166203238230
Quenneville184233248181
Pete Green192NDNDND
TarasovND181237202
Hap DayND210226ND
Cecil HartND235ND214
ImlachND236NDND
LemaireNDND228ND
L. RobinsonNDND235ND
GormanNDNDND241
[TBODY] [/TBODY]
Bowman picked in the 11th Round. It DIDN'T start a run. Happens. Next coach not picked until Round 14.
Eight coaches always picked. Tarasov has his streak end this year. Pete Green makes his debut.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad