Yes to more fringe 2nd liners!!!!!1!! #berglund #chiasson #legwand #Michalek #2015cupwinners
AYCYA(F)M
Depth son, depth.
I like depth, but I like having a real top-6 better.
and after we draft McDavid or Eichel we will.
Not if we have this much depth.
New lotto format. There is always hope.
Especially if the league lotto is as rigged as I believe it to be.
When will the clever title be done?
There's no way the lottery is rigged, because there is no way anyone in the league would be stupid enough to give Edmonton as many 1st overall picks as they did.
If it were rigged, those picks would have gone to U.S. teams, to "grow the game".
Yeah, we already have enough "Berglunds" on this team. Don't want another, especially since he's getting the Stewart treatment from the fans down there. When you have the same name appearing in most fans trade proposals to move out, you know that's exactly the kind of guy we don't want.
Berglund is a proven 20 goal scorer
Macarthur, Turris, Ryan, Michalek
those are the only proven 20 goal scorers we have on this team.
How about a proven 30-40 goal scorer. I'd think we were going after one of those beauties.
Berglund is a proven 20 goal scorer
Macarthur, Turris, Ryan, Michalek
those are the only proven 20 goal scorers we have on this team.
Berglund is a proven 20 goal scorer
Macarthur, Turris, Ryan, Michalek
those are the only proven 20 goal scorers we have on this team.
But, do you want to give up a guy like Lazar, or our first rounder in 2015 to get that 20-goal scorer? Any team that talks to us will be looking for one (if not both) of those assets for any player we ask for. That's the problem.
I seriously doubt we get any kind of deal done this summer for a legitimate top 6 guy without giving up at least one of our two prized (future) assets.
A proven 20 goal scorer only sets up for mediocrity. We need top end talent. A guy who can score 25+ while being a big factor in other areas of the game.
Berglund is a proven 20 goal scorer who hasn't hit the mark in 4 years. While being very inconsistent.
Unless we can get him for a 2nd+small prospect, why bother?
But, do you want to give up a guy like Lazar, or our first rounder in 2015 to get that 20-goal scorer? Any team that talks to us will be looking for one (if not both) of those assets for any player we ask for. That's the problem.
I seriously doubt we get any kind of deal done this summer for a legitimate top 6 guy without giving up at least one of our two prized (future) assets.
I've said this before somewhere in terms of his left hook but I also see Lazar as having Mike Fisher's potential in his overall body and game style. He's still a kid but that's what I see in his future.What do you guys think lazar's potential is? Personally i see him as a gritty 20 goal scorer in his bet years. Kinda fisher like intensity. I think i'd includ him in a package for a legit young 30 g man. Best bet is to wait and see what we have in this first wave of young players. For all we know Stone, Hoffman and Chiasson could be legit top 6ers in the NHL.
What do you guys think lazar's potential is? Personally i see him as a gritty 20 goal scorer in his bet years. Kinda fisher like intensity. I think i'd includ him in a package for a legit young 30 g man. Best bet is to wait and see what we have in this first wave of young players. For all we know Stone, Hoffman and Chiasson could be legit top 6ers in the NHL.
agreed but i think we also need depth
EK??Berglund is a proven 20 goal scorer
Macarthur, Turris, Ryan, Michalek
those are the only proven 20 goal scorers we have on this team.
What do you guys think lazar's potential is? Personally i see him as a gritty 20 goal scorer in his bet years. Kinda fisher like intensity. I think i'd includ him in a package for a legit young 30 g man. Best bet is to wait and see what we have in this first wave of young players. For all we know Stone, Hoffman and Chiasson could be legit top 6ers in the NHL.