eco's bones
Registered User
York is the one who held him back. It wasn't by choice. Anybody who watched the second half of the season when York let him play his game saw a more explosive player. That's why his PPG doubled after the WJC.
Another thing I never got about the Bouwmeester comparison (Button again) was that he was always timid and got rattled. He's still like that today.
Hanifin is far more assertive and nowhere near the turnover/bonehead decision machine Bouwmeester has always been.
Also, Bouwmeester was in his 3rd full year of junior when drafted and didn't make that impressive a jump in what was an average draft year.
Hanifin is just a completely different player in a completely different scenario. Only thing they have in common is the size and that they're defensemen.
He's the best defenseman in this draft and more signs point to him holding on to that distinction far down the road, which says a lot considering the strength of the draft.
That's why I have no issues trading a guy like Stepan for him, especially since Hayes is projecting to be the same kind of player and Brassard is in his prime.
If the Rangers weren't one of the top teams in the league I might agree with the idea of moving Stepan for Hanifin but the problem is they've been to the Cup finals once and the conference finals twice in the last four years and as long as the window is open for us as a contending team the Rangers are going to need Stepan more than Hanifin the next two, three, four years. Though none of Stepan, Brassard and Hayes are elite players they are all still fairly young and give the Rangers 3 centers for 3 lines that can score which if you're going to have a team without elite offensive players is almost essential if you want to still have some kind of semblance of a contending team.
For the longer term no doubt we'd be a better team with Hanifin. For the shorter term without Stepan we're a lot more likely not to win a cup.