Proposal: Nylander and Andersen for Garland and Kuemper

[Unbiased Fan]

Toronto- Nylander and Andersen

Arizona- Garland and Kuemper

Toronto- gains cap flexibility while upgrading in net.

arizona- gets the best player who would instantly become their best forward.

Click to read more...

 

[Djp]

 

[Hockey 4 Life]

I like both coyote players but this isn't the right move for the leafs.

 

[HockeyVirus]

Terribad for the Leafs.

 

[LEAFANFORLIFE23]

Garland isn't closer to Nylander

 

[Baby Doaner]

Start with Matthews. Haha

 

[rt]

Garland isn't closer to Nylander

Garland has 27 points in 35 games.
Nylander as 26 points in 36 games.
Nylander is six weeks younger than Garland.
Nylander plays for the league's 4th best offense.
Garland plays for the league's 5th worst offense.
Nylander's cap-hit is NINE TIMES Garland's.

It's okay to think Nylander is the better player. It's okay to think Nylander has better trade-value. But I think it's probably somewhat close, and to say it's not even close is hyperbolic.

 

[Dache]

Garland isn't closer to Nylander

Psst. Those aren’t the only players in the deal.

 

[Captain Mountain]

Salary cap is a thing.

I think you're also probably underrating Garland or overrating Nylander. Or both.

 

[GoldiFox]

I'd rather have Garland than Nylander if I could add one. The $5+ million in salary difference helps.

 

[ShortSideFlick]

Garland has 27 points in 35 games.
Nylander as 26 points in 36 games.
Nylander is six weeks younger than Garland.
Nylander plays for the league's 4th best offense.
Garland plays for the league's 5th worst offense.
Nylander's cap-hit is NINE TIMES Garland's.

It's okay to think Nylander is the better player. It's okay to think Nylander has better trade-value. But I think it's probably somewhat close, and to say it's not even close is hyperbolic.

Yes, let's all focus exclusively on the past 35 games of their careers.

It's "hyperbolic" to pretend it's close because of a 35 game sample size while ignoring the rest of their careers, a far larger sample size, which says that it isn't close.

 

[Hitemwith4]

Isn't Kuemper injury prone

 

[Michael HOMERUNing]

We don't need to be trading playmakers for goal scorers

 

[Avsavsavsavsavs]

Start with Matthews. Haha

You have some great takes between this and the game day thread for the Avs game last night keep it up totally.

 

[Leafidelity]

No thanks.

 

[Baby Doaner]

You have some great takes between this and the game day thread for the Avs game last night keep it up totally.

Thanksthanksthanksthanksthanks.

 

[IWantSakicAsMyGM]

Yes, let's all focus exclusively on the past 35 games of their careers.

It's "hyperbolic" to pretend it's close because of a 35 game sample size while ignoring the rest of their careers, a far larger sample size, which says that it isn't close.

Last year, over an additional 68 games, Garland scored at 2.09 ES P/60 compared to Nylander at 2.29 ES P/60. And that's with Toronto scoring 47 more goals than Arizona.

 

[ShortSideFlick]

Last year, over an additional 68 games, Garland scored at 2.09 ES P/60 compared to Nylander at 2.29 ES P/60. And that's with Toronto scoring 47 more goals than Arizona.

Last year Nylander had more than 50% more points than Garland. No, it isn't close.

 

[Petrus]

Garland has 27 points in 35 games.
Nylander as 26 points in 36 games.
Nylander is six weeks younger than Garland.
Nylander plays for the league's 4th best offense.
Garland plays for the league's 5th worst offense.
Nylander's cap-hit is NINE TIMES Garland's.

It's okay to think Nylander is the better player. It's okay to think Nylander has better trade-value. But I think it's probably somewhat close, and to say it's not even close is hyperbolic.

Career 0.56 PPG (150 games) vs 0.72 PPG (343 games)

Other than Nylander is 1 month younger, how is this close?

 

[IWantSakicAsMyGM]

Last year Nylander had more than 50% more points than Garland. No, it isn't close.

He also played 4+ more minutes per game, on the 2nd highest scoring team in the NHL, and had 17 PP points compared to only 5 for Garland. An extra 20 points isn't all that impressive, in that context.

 

[Menzinger]

That's a split second no from the Leafs

 

[Menzinger]

He also played 4+ more minutes per game, on the 2nd highest scoring team in the NHL, and had 17 PP points compared to only 5 for Garland. An extra 20 points isn't all that impressive, in that context.

He plays a bigger role because he's a better player. Hence his value is considerably higher.

Edit: age mixup

 

[Skinnyjimmy08]

Its NOT BAD but IMO its not the right deal for the Leafs.

Pretty decent proposal tho!

Kuemper is good but too injury prone it seems... thats the kicker for me. Garland is very underrated and would be a good acquisition tho

The cap flexibility is HUGE though for TO... thats a tough thing to find nowadays

 

[banks]

Swap Kemper for Raanta and Arizona says yes. Maybe.

 

[LeafGrief]

Ah yes, the 'ol "my guy is cheaper even though he needs a new deal in 20 games" argument.