Speculation: Monahan forward most likely dealt first

Status
Not open for further replies.

ole ole

Registered User
Oct 7, 2017
11,937
6,021
Not to this NYR fan. Berard and Sykora are two guys the Rangers should not trade especially for a UFA. Bottom 6/ Middle 6 guys who play a certain style with some skill that they sorely need. Almost rather give up a first surely a 2nd rather than either of those 2.
We'll take a 2nd but your gonna need to attach something that makes Hughes say ok. The 57th pick OA alone doesn't cut it.
 

Hunter368

RIP lomiller1, see you in the next life buddy.
Nov 8, 2011
27,072
23,774
I would have serious questions whether he could stand up to the rigours of playoffs. I’m sure a lot of GMs are wondering the same

Agreed, but you know someone will make the trade and hope & pray. Personally I wouldn't, I would roll with what we have at 2C and upgrade other positions of need. At worst if I did trade for a Monahan with his long history of injuries, the deal would be heavily conditional based regarding games played, etc. Plus with Monahan you know year to year he could potentially be done and onto LTIR so no one better sign him longer term due to his short shelf life. Maybe he could do 1 year deals for the next 3-4 years and GM's would be ok with that, but I would be surprised any contender over the next 5 years would sign him to any 3-4-5 year deal due to his health risks. A none contender over the next 3-5 years might be more open to a 3-5 year deal with him bc they don't care overly if he goes down to injury bc they aren't competing for any cups or titles.

Nothing specifically aimed at Monahan, I'm talking in general all players/teams, GM's often fighting for their jobs will make ill advised trades/signings at the TDL & summer FA frenzy, we all see it year after year.
 

ole ole

Registered User
Oct 7, 2017
11,937
6,021
totally understood. Most Habs fans don't watch Hartford Wolfpack games like most Ranger fans don't watch Laval games. Berard has been probably the best young player for the AHL Wolfpack team.


I am shocked the Rangers would turn down trading probably the best player in college hockey this year. Surely one of the best freshman in the NCAA.
Ya if he's been looking that good ,you don't trade him for Monahan.
I still think he gets a 1st or the equivalence of a first.
Rangers are one team probably looking for a C ,
 

jgimp

Registered User
Sep 18, 2017
2,534
3,230
Ripley, Ont
Agreed, but you know someone will make the trade and hope & pray. Personally I wouldn't, I would roll with what we have at 2C and upgrade other positions of need. At worst if I did trade for a Monahan with his long history of injuries, the deal would be heavily conditional based regarding games played, etc. Plus with Monahan you know year to year he could potentially be done and onto LTIR so no one better sign him longer term due to his short shelf life. Maybe he could do 1 year deals for the next 3-4 years and GM's would be ok with that, but I would be surprised any contender over the next 5 years would sign him to any 3-4-5 year deal due to his health risks. A none contender over the next 3-5 years might be more open to a 3-5 year deal with him bc they don't care overly if he goes down to injury bc they aren't competing for any cups or titles.

Nothing specifically aimed at Monahan, I'm talking in general all players/teams, GM's often fighting for their jobs will make ill advised trades/signings at the TDL & summer FA frenzy, we all see it year after year.
I think that Chevy has his eye on someone that nobody will see coming ala Neider or Names. Someone with term that fill fit our system and room.
Monahan doesn’t do enough to justify the cost. He’s good at faceoffs and PP but that kinda it. He’s a little better defensively this year, but seeing as we need a defensively minded 2C between Ehlers and Perfetti, Monahan ain’t it. Plus our Pp is so statistically bad and static, that 1 guy isn’t going to come in and fix it. Monahan isn’t fixing that either.
I’d rather target, and give up more for a guy with term like Mitts or Jenner than overpay for an oft injured PP specialist who’s not a fit on the 2nd line
 
  • Like
Reactions: kenobiwan

Hunter368

RIP lomiller1, see you in the next life buddy.
Nov 8, 2011
27,072
23,774
I think that Chevy has his eye on someone that nobody will see coming ala Neider or Names. Someone with term that fill fit our system and room.
Monahan doesn’t do enough to justify the cost. He’s good at faceoffs and PP but that kinda it. He’s a little better defensively this year, but seeing as we need a defensively minded 2C between Ehlers and Perfetti, Monahan ain’t it. Plus our Pp is so statistically bad and static, that 1 guy isn’t going to come in and fix it. Monahan isn’t fixing that either.
I’d rather target, and give up more for a guy with term like Mitts or Jenner than overpay for an oft injured PP specialist who’s not a fit on the 2nd line

Monahan is a polarizing player for fans, he does somethings well, somethings poorly/not so well and on top of that is the significant injury history/risks with him. I'm not evening commenting on fit within any teams system or style, bc thats different to each team. Monahan is a box of chocolates. :laugh:
 
Last edited:

AlexGretzchenvid

Registered User
Jan 19, 2013
3,816
2,299
In every world even in the world where Poitras doesn't exist


He would get marginally more than a 3rd. Late 2nd is fair
STOP IT, MOST 1st round players don’t even PAN OUT into what Monahan will provide to a contending team for a playoff run and potentially beyond.

Getting a late 2nd for Pearson sounds more in line than what you’re insinuating.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: WhiskeyYerTheDevils

General Fanager

Registered User
Feb 2, 2010
11,772
3,421
Chambly, Qc
Monahan is a polarizing player for fans, he does somethings well, somethings poorly and on top of that is the significant injury history/risks with him. I'm not evening commenting on fit within any teams system or style, bc thats different to each team. Monahan is a box of chocolates. :laugh:
Maybe ...but everyone loves chocolate....
 
  • Like
Reactions: BLONG7

JeffreyLFC

Registered User
Sep 29, 2017
10,339
7,488
People have amnesia.
Every single year people laugh at the thought of players getting traded for 1st round pick at the TDL and every year it happens and 1st/2nd round pick are thrown away like candies.

GMs do not know when is the next time they can challenge for the cup and they will do everything in their power to get the upper hands against their opposition.
 
Last edited:

The Gr8 Dane

L'harceleur
Jan 19, 2018
11,304
21,762
Montreal
People have amnesia.
Every single year people laugh at the thought of players getting traded for 1st round pick at the TDL and every year it happens and 1st/2nd round pick are thrown away like candies.

GMs do not know when is the next time they can challenge for the cup and they will do everything in their power to get the upper hands to their oposition.
Yeah I think even the earlier nonbelievers think a low first rounder + body/prospect is possible/reasonable now ,




only for habs fans to start talking about Mcgroarty Lambert Zegras and other nonsense and it all comes full circle again lmao


Give us an inch and we take a mile haha
 

Big Daddy Cane

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Feb 8, 2010
13,401
32,129
Western PA
One major issue people miss is, teams who give up prime assets, almost always do so, with the intention of extending the player acquired.

I'm not sure about this narrative. The retention rate is low historically. Since 2014, 1st round rentals to be re-signed: Eaves, Kane, Pageau (T&S), Zajac+Palmieri, Lindholm (T&S), Horvat and Gavrikov. Those that walked: Miller, Franson, Vermette, Sekera, Ladd, Hanzal, Shattenkirk, Nash, Stastny, Duchene, Hayes, Foligno, Savard, Chiarot, Giroux, Copp, Bertuzzi, Orlov, O'Reilly and Tarasenko. That's 7 for 27 (~26%). I find it hard to believe that GMs are unaware of that, when a trade of that magnitude is made. If the intention is not likely, is it really the intention or is it justification to make them feel better about the likely outcome (disappointment)?
 
  • Like
Reactions: TS Quint

Walksss

Registered User
Mar 26, 2013
463
658
Of course Monahan isn't gonna get McGroarty or Perrault or some other A prospect straight up. Most reasonable people know this, it's still very likely he moves for a late 1st+ or equivalent though.

I'd imagine the Habs will more likely take an equivalent prospect. Best prospect offered is the proud new owner of a slightly used Sean Monahan.

Obviously the Habs could take on a salary dump as well to sweeten the offer. Maybe it does end up as a larger deal, anything is possible with KH in the driver's seat.
 

John Mandalorian

2022 Avs: The First Dance
Nov 29, 2018
11,058
6,870
Of course Monahan isn't gonna get McGroarty or Perrault or some other A prospect straight up. Most reasonable people know this, it's still very likely he moves for a late 1st+ or equivalent though.

I'd imagine the Habs will more likely take an equivalent prospect. Best prospect offered is the proud new owner of a slightly used Sean Monahan.

Obviously the Habs could take on a salary dump as well to sweeten the offer. Maybe it does end up as a larger deal, anything is possible with KH in the driver's seat.

Allen isnt exactly worth his salary. Maybe you can swap him for another dump/reclation project?
 

Walksss

Registered User
Mar 26, 2013
463
658
Allen isnt exactly worth his salary. Maybe you can swap him for another dump/reclation project?

I imagine Allen doesn't have a ton of stand alone value. If he got a 3rd with retention I'd be impressed. Maybe as part of a larger deal with a cap dump coming back, I dunno.

Monahan
Allen w/retention

Vs.

Quality prospect or picks
Cap dump

Or some combination like that. I'm not sure if there's too many suitors for that but it's definitely workable for a win-win trade there.
 

Bouboumaster

Registered User
Jul 4, 2014
9,829
7,930
I wouldn't even give a second look to an offer that doesn't include a 1st round pick

1st round pick would be the bare minimum, and than we could talk about retention on Monahan, etc, adds to be made on one side or the other, players added, etc

But no 1st round, no trade
 

McSuper

5-14-6-1
Jun 16, 2012
16,980
6,641
Halifax
Give Monahan decent wingers and he will produce 5v5 the guy can play hockey hes just stuck playing with black holes hes been putting more 5v5 points now since rookie Joshua Roy got called up

Obviously Lindholm is plan A for most teams but dont sleep on Sean lots of teams will be interested
This all may be very true but Monahan has injury concern base on his past and most Montreal fans only look at the stat line for the offensive numbers while ignoring the superior defensive side of other centres.
 

General Fanager

Registered User
Feb 2, 2010
11,772
3,421
Chambly, Qc
This all may be very true but Monahan has injury concern base on his past and most Montreal fans only look at the stat line for the offensive numbers while ignoring the superior defensive side of other centres.
you do understand that we are not just making it up right? We are getting our info from reporters who have said that several teams are interested in Monahan and even more so now that Lindholm is off the board.

I wouldn't even give a second look to an offer that doesn't include a 1st round pick

1st round pick would be the bare minimum, and than we could talk about retention on Monahan, etc, adds to be made on one side or the other, players added, etc

But no 1st round, no trade

or equivalent prospect, I mean The Habs cant keep adding picks. Its time to add real players.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pat Riot

Pat Riot

Registered User
Sep 30, 2017
1,293
1,190
I wouldn't even give a second look to an offer that doesn't include a 1st round pick

1st round pick would be the bare minimum, and than we could talk about retention on Monahan, etc, adds to be made on one side or the other, players added, etc

But no 1st round, no trade
Retention wont be needed foe Monahan. His cap will be less than 1 million at the deadline

And I would prefer a grade A prospect way more than a first round pick. So a trade is quite possible without any draft pick being involved
 

John Mandalorian

2022 Avs: The First Dance
Nov 29, 2018
11,058
6,870
Retention wont be needed foe Monahan. His cap will be less than 1 million at the deadline

And I would prefer a grade A prospect way more than a first round pick. So a trade is quite possible without any draft pick being involved

The grade A prospect is typically more of a sure thing than the late 1st. What else are you offering?
 
  • Like
Reactions: MardyBum

Pat Riot

Registered User
Sep 30, 2017
1,293
1,190
The grade A prospect is typically more of a sure thing than the late 1st. What else are you offering?
Cap relief, willing to add picks to monahan or a young LD.

Of course it all depends of which prospect we are talking about. Im looking for another Dach type of trade
 

EveryDay

Registered User
Jun 13, 2009
13,237
5,352
This all may be very true but Monahan has injury concern base on his past and most Montreal fans only look at the stat line for the offensive numbers while ignoring the superior defensive side of other centres.
Is it really concerning these injuries? After 11 seasons in the NHL Monahan only missed 60 more games then Elias Lindholm in their respective careers and 50 of theses games where last year when they decided to finally operated him. He hasn't miss a shift so far this year and he look great even his shitty linemates.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Scintillating10

Pat Riot

Registered User
Sep 30, 2017
1,293
1,190
You think teams will want to give up A prospects for a couple of months of Monahan and a 2nd?
Where did I say a 2rd pick? You just assumed I guess. I said picks plural and we own a couple of first round pick too. Like I said depends of the grade A prospect but I believe the habs have what it takes to complete such trade
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad