Not ignoring it, but how many times does it need to be said that it was an obvious outlier?
It makes more sense if you believe, as I do, that last season was a mirage.
Maybe this season is the mirage? We have a 2 year sample size with one being great and one being poor. Naturally, one would say that the team is somewhere in between but we really don't know which is which because it's only a 2 year sample size, is it closer to last season or closer to this season?
Every team has injuries to deal with. The Jets have been banged up all year but they have depth to make up for it. Execution is harder to pin down but talent plays a role there too, as does coaching and pure luck. But those things are a lot easier to fix than having a bad roster with like eight fourth liners up front.
I was just piggybacking off your mention of injuries, it was obviously a factor even if it was a small one.
Again, as I said before, it's virtually the same roster that we had last season with the exception of Eberle to Puljujarvi, DD to Strome and Pouliot to Khaira so the roster last season was littered with flaws as well. I know, you think last season was a mirage but how many players had outlier seasons last year? I see Maroon and Letestu so why is it a mirage, who else had unsustainable success last season?
To simplify my stance, you said the reason for failure is simple "the roster isn't good". I don't think it's that simple although it's certainly a flawed roster and that's where we disagree.