Vesa Awesaka
#KeepTheSenate
- Jul 4, 2013
- 18,236
- 25
You're looking at this in some kind of parallel universe vacuum. Take a look at the history of arbitration and you will see that your opinion you seem willing to fall on is almost the exact opposite to the facts. Neither team, nor player want to go to hearing, and both sides almost always work their ***** off to try and strike a deal before the hearing. What it does do though is force a final date on negotiations, which is the very important, but clearly overlooked point.
Bold:
Uhm, how about this: Most players that file for arbitration never make it to the hearing, which means that in almost all cases the player is NOT stuck with a one year deal by filing. Both team and players almost always settle on a deal and move on because filing for arbitration is generally a move by either side to pressure a deal before the hearing. Sure, he may end up with a one or two year deal awarded by the arbitrator, but all of the smart money is on a deal made before the hearing. Now all of that 'lol'ing' just makes you look a little silly now doesn't it
You may feel as though your story makes sense, and you clearly have no problems arguing it vehemently either way, but the reality of the situation is that by far the majority of arbitration filings are used to leverage deals either way. Hoffman very likely has NO interest in a one year deal.
I know most players dont head to a hearing but hes set himself on the path TO A 1 YEAR DEAL. He is going to get a one year deal unless the sens change their offer. Why would he elect for a process that would LEAD TO A ONE YEAR DEAL if he absolutely was unwilling to take a one year deal.
You havent been able to explain how him filing for arbitration helps him get term. It in fact sets him on the path to what you say he doesnt want at all.
The problem i have is you suggested hes unwilling to take a one year deal. Is that what you are saying?
-Sens offer a one year deal
-Hoffman refuses because he wants term and files for arbitration that will lead to a one year deal unless the sens change their offer
vs
-Sens offer a one year deal
-Hoffman refuses because he wants term and choose not to file for a process that will lead to a one year contract because he wants term so badly
Arbitration takes away leverage to get himself term. It adds leverage to get him paid fairly for one year
I 100 percent bet you are right he doesnt want a one year deal but him filing for a process that will lead to a one year deal suggests to me hes willing to take one
I rarely get incensed but my gosh this seems so simple.
Last edited: