Osgood 1.0 won 69 of his first hundred games back when there were ties.
Who is Osgood 2.0? Legace? 3.0 is Howard? Who is 4.0? Mrazek?
That's really neat. I too enjoy how people get really pissy when Osgood's accomplishments are undermined by him just playing behind a good team and people defending that he really was actually good, but in the case of Murray being called Osgood, it's being used in a demeaning way. That's really clever, cool even.
And yet, here we are, Murray has won 2 cups in his first 2yrs, is still very much one of the better young goalies in the NHL under 25yrs old and finally not a rookie by technical terms and after his father passing away, has been playing like his old self again.
These assumptions are fantastic.
"Anyone can score 20 goals with Crosby, like me for example" - Random HF'er for the longest time on Hfboards, which has been proven false by literally the rotation of wingers that people would call nobodies that could never hit 20+ goals with Crosby.
Now it's "Murray is average"...remember when "Fleury would never win a cup!" or that "Fleury was just good because he's on the Penguins"...well how's MAF doing in Vegas?