IWantSakicAsMyGM
Registered User
Well Galchenyuk + 1st + good prospect is not really insane depending on the prospect...
I wouldn't trade him to MTL for anything less either...
Galchenyuk really does not fit what the Avs want and the MTL media is already out for blood.
There is no way in hell the Avs do it straight up..
And what else aside from a 1st or/and prospects could MB offer to sweeten the deal and make Sakic settle for something he really does not want?
@IWSAMG:
That stupid narrative has to die.
No Duchenes value won't go up because he can sign an extension...
Not gonna happen.
Yeah Carolina might be very interested if he will agree to an extension as part of the deal.
But the Avs can't allow them to discuss it beforehand and there is no chance the Canes will give up Hanifin unless Duchene is signed to a sweet heart contract longterm as part of the deal...
Which really has 0 chance of happening.
Especially because again. The Avs can't allow them to even discuss it or it would kill all their leverage if the trade falls apart..
They will offer more or less the same package of futures they are probably offering now if they think there is a high chance that he will extend.
If they don't believe that he is a good bet to extend, the offers will get way worse....
Duchene has to be traded in the next few months.
Everything else would be just another pathetic chapter in the life of our godawful GM that needs to be sacked asap...
What narrative? It's something that could plausibly happen, even if it's unlikely. Maybe it's not Hanifin, maybe it's Fleury. Maybe it's another young LHD who makes strides this season. Maybe a team misses the playoffs and is willing to give up their low percentage lottery pick before the 2018 draft. Maybe the Avs win the lottery, get Dahlin, and don't need to focus on LHD so much. There's a hundred different unlikely outcomes that could still happen at some point before next off season.
Also, if the offers are going to be the same, more or less, what's the rush? To avoid all risks, no matter how probable they actually are? That's the kind of thinking that results in mediocrity. I'd rather have a GM that aims for the stars and misses than one who aims much lower and hits.