Mugzy97
#StandWitness
Why?
I just don't like his game. There are guys who have played out AHL careers that are better than him, IMO.
Why?
You forgot Carrick but our top 7 could easily be (in no particular order):
Gardiner
Rielly
Zaitsev
Hainsey
Carrick
Borgman
Rosen
Depending on how they look in camp.
I'd love to squeeze Marincin off the roster.
Agreed. We need Marincin. He has value as a bottom pairing guy. Tends to take blame that he shouldn't. Becoming an effective defence man doesn't happen right away for some players - that doesn't mean it won't happen or isn't happening - it's a learning curve. As long as he's cheap I'd keep him.
We carry 8 D, so Marincin will likely be there.
Marchenko is likely waiver/trade fodder
i think we will carry 2 extra forwards and 1 extra defenseman this season given that leivo and rychel both need waivers i think. if someone scoops up marchenko or marincin off waivers i dont think it is a big loss.
Babcock scouting them personally, and likely gave the green light.
I think the fact they weren't at the development camp says a lot.
Even if we carry 2 extra forwards (14 total), Rychel won't be one of them.
1. Matthews
2. Nylander
3. Marner
4. Kadri
5. JVR
6. Marleau
7. Bozak
8. Brown
9. Komarov
10. Hyman
11. Kapanen
12. Moore
13. Martin
14. Leivo
And then there's Soshnikov.
Even if we carry 2 extra forwards (14 total), Rychel won't be one of them.
1. Matthews
2. Nylander
3. Marner
4. Kadri
5. JVR
6. Marleau
7. Bozak
8. Brown
9. Komarov
10. Hyman
11. Kapanen
12. Moore
13. Martin
14. Leivo
And then there's Soshnikov.
I'd rather have Polak than Marincin
I'd agree with that.
People forget marincin is still a very good shot suppressor. Polak bleeds shots AnD might be slower than marincin too
One of these guys has..HAS to be better than Marincin. I have always gave Marincin a passing grade because we were rebuilding, but he almost single handedly lost that series for us. It's time to upgrade and I like what these two Swedes bring.
That's a bit exaggerated.
Marincin is interesting, because he's awful at puck movement but is extremely good at defending against zone entries. I'd guess that would be the reason why he can do fine on a heavy lifting top pairing, only to struggle immensely on a sheltered bottom pairing the next game. How good he does could be primarily determined by how much help his linemates can give him with the zone exits, and how much the opposing players try to carry in.
I don't thin Marincin is a bad player. I've seen him play a stretch of games at a pretty high level so he has it in him. Needs to display consistency though and I think a healthy year will do him good.
I think he has the potential to become a very solid 5th D man if health permits and he displays consistency.
That's a bit exaggerated.
Marincin is interesting, because he's awful at puck movement but is extremely good at defending against zone entries. I'd guess that would be the reason why he can do fine on a heavy lifting top pairing, only to struggle immensely on a sheltered bottom pairing the next game. How good he does could be primarily determined by how much help his linemates can give him with the zone exits, and how much the opposing players try to carry in.
C'mon. This is ridiculous. Marty isn't great but atleast he doesn't get hemmed in his own end for shifts on end