McCoy and an OA centre does not make Kingston a contender, it allows them to be in the hunt come trade deadline while speeding up the development of the many 18 yr olds.
McCoy and an OA centre does not make Kingston a contender, it allows them to be in the hunt come trade deadline while speeding up the development of the many 18 yr olds.
I still think trading away the 4th overall pick - who is going to be a very good OHL'er isnt a good move to make. Offer up other decent pieces that may be of value to another team and keep hopkins where possible and you set yourself up for a decent year this year and next year. I'm thinking of Battaglia, Budnick, Uens, Heyes and or Poole -- these guys are good players and all, but I wouldn't lose sleep over them not being here, especially if you can get a Mccoy for example.
Trading a top 5 picked 16 yr old is rare. The 5th & 6th traded last year probably equals the past 20 years total. I can only remember Kujawinski before that.
Donovan McCoy is likely not going to be traded by the Petes as you said in your post he likely will be an overage next year and the Petes will use him as one of their overages.
He is then an OA if born in 04 regardless of month of birth
Pete’s are going to suck this year and next year. Would be very foolish to keep him. But of the remaining valuable guys that you have I think he’s the least likely to be traded (Beck, Mayer, Lockhart, Smith, McCoy)
hes 100 percent eligible to be an overage, late birthdates have nothing to do with it
Ludwinski and Burns are the only ones left. Soto was back at practice yesterday and Miedema was back on Tuesday. Vellaris is playing in the OJHL, meaning at this time they have likely one too many d (Williamson, Ling, Bergeron) as I see Burns-Holmes-Budnick-Uens-McGowan-Schnieder the starting D if Burns is back for Thursday, if not slot in one of the (3).
