How can you call Andersson a B prospect but call Kylington and Fox A prospects? And Bennett and Jankowski aren’t prospects anymore.This is a poor assessment. While Monahan isn't much of a "playmaker", and Ferland is shooting more on that line, both guys are balanced high IQ players who can work a give and go with Johnny. Kane is basically a rich man's Frolik... shoots every time the puck is his vicinity. Which can be frustrating as sometimes there hasn't been traffic in front of the net for the shot to be dangerous, or linemates like Tkachuk or Eichel or Gaudreau envision a higher-end give and go play developing for a backdoor tap in. Frolik hasn't worked with Gaudreau for the same reason, and is also the weak link on the 3M line.
Would I trade Frolik and a B prospect like Andersson, Ruzicka, Lindstrom, or Gillies for Kane? Probably. But A prospects like Fox, Kylington, Valimaki, Parsons, Bennett, Jankowski, Dube, Phillips, Rittich? Hard No. I just don't think Kane is worth that especially as he won't come without a cap hit and I am not sure he is actually better defensively than Frolik. Evander Kane is a 2.5th liner... skilled enough to produce like a top 6 guy if force fed minutes but you're better off with him on a checking line. I'd compare him to Leo Komarov for instance. He's also incredibly injury prone.
Look at Phillips numbers.You confused people with those "A" prospects, especially Phillips and Rittich
Brodie for Kane would be a good trade imo.
I'd consider Kane and Johnson for Bennett and a B-Prospect.
Depends how much Kane is re-signed for. & if it's say about $6 million x 6 why would Buffalo do that only to retain 50%?Treliving was at the Sabres game tonight and you know Burke would love Kane's style.
Kane didn't disappoint scoring his 11 goal and 19th point in 19 games.
Chad Johnson also started for the Sabres....
Kane (50%) & signed
Chad Johnson
Jake McCabe
2nd
for
Sam Bennett
Brodie
Eddie Lack
The answer is we wouldn't. Any retention would be on his current deal only.Depends how much Kane is re-signed for. & if it's say about $6 million x 6 why would Buffalo do that only to retain 50%?
You are out of your mind if you think Bennet & Lack has any value of meaning in this league. I wouldn't trade McCabe&Johnson for them and McCabe is pretty darn not good at all 4-6D... Throwing in Kane and you refusing just shows that some people live in a parallel universe rather than consider what their actual GMs would do when replying to trade proposals.I missed that Brodie was included and just thought it was Bennett and Lack and still would have passed. With Brodie in there that is ridiculous.
I wouldn't trade Brodie or Bennett straight up for that package.
Left shot, shoot first, second, third and last LWer is not what the team needs. Throw in what a d-bag he is and it is an easy no for me.
Seems fair. How has Kylington progressed ?
Kane
Johnson
for
Bennett
Kylington
Lack
Bad work with young guys or bad drafts?I dont want Sam Bennett on my team. We have enough failed 1st rounders as is.
Bad work with young guys or bad drafts?
Bennett was my favorite young center. When he started in the NHL, I was looking forward to his performance. And nothing.. It is a pity.To be honest, in the case of Bennett, probably both.
Bennett was my favorite young center. When he started in the NHL, I was looking forward to his performance. And nothing.. It is a pity.