Hmm, it seems you have a higher opinion of the system than many people who recognize that celebrity, as crazy as it is, can affect neutrality, and an ambitious D.A. can turn on the full blast if they think it helps their career, or alternatively, let someone off the hook because they know the right people or whatever reasons there are. Good to hear that this is not an issue at all in the legal system in the USA.
I was referring to your posts here and how they will be received. This thread is read tens of thousands of times, and some posters here seem very interested in clinging on to your views since you know the field. This is the biggest hockey forum in the world. Even though it's not your job to make sure you don't spread incorrect information online, it does de facto kind of place a certain responsibility when you make your comments in an expert role on the topic. For (admittedly not a perfect) analogy, if I translate and post here something reported in Finnish media I check and double check I got it right, because there is a chance the news will spread online. The whole Raanta thing couple threads below started with an online user translating some quotes from a Finnish tabloid, which were then repeated in a Yahoo blog, and it spread from there.