ManofSteel55
Registered User
Of course, but the disparity in his production against good teams and bad teams in recent seasons isn't anything close to normal.
I have seen it mentioned a few times that Eberle is 19th in RW scoring in the past 2 seasons. If we look at the 11 players between 20-30 then 10 of them have more points against playoff opposition in the last 2 seasons than Eberle, the only one that doesn't has a better point per game production (Vrbata).
My point remains. If a playoff team is going to take on $6m for a winger then they need him to score when it matters. Just watching him makes you question how effective he would be, then 136 games over 3 seasons isn't a small sample size and 26 goals in that span isn't good enough.
I would wager that all (or nearly all) of those guys were on better teams than what Eberle was two years ago as well. It is much harder to score against good teams when you are playing on a team that sucks, and 2 years ago, we sucked.
I don't think your numbers mean that much when you examine why it might be that way. It isn't that Eberle only scores against bad teams. It's that 2 years ago he played on an awful team who didn't score much against good teams. This is something that you can see in dozens of players who have been on bad teams, not just Eberle. I'm pretty sure Kessel had the same criticism in Toronto and he is one of the biggest reasons the Pens won the cup last year.
I find it funny that all of these things come out trying to discredit Eberle. It's reaching pretty hard to try to discount a guy who is a 60 point, 25 goal player.
A year ago the criticism was that he was a defensive liability. Now that he has improved his defensive play, it's that he should be scoring more points. Well, he would be, but he worked on changing his game a lot throughout the season so he would be more effective when not scoring. That gets ignored now though for his playoff run and people trying to use stats without properly understanding what that particular stat actually says about the player. I guess that's so you can run his value down.