Mort you make it sound like Lowry is playing with all stars.
For the most part Lowry has been playing with pretty mediocre players.
I could be very wrong here but his best linemates he has consistently played with has probably been armia and it's not like armia has been an offensive force in the NHL.
I would offer Ehlers for Hanifin
Hanifin is apparently available. What would you guys give up for him? I'd easily go Enstrom + Connor/Roslovic... I don't even feel that would be enough.
I would offer Ehlers for Hanifin
Hanifin is apparently available. What would you guys give up for him? I'd easily go Enstrom + Connor/Roslovic... I don't even feel that would be enough.
One more goal scored has equal value to one fewer goal against...
Being relatively worse at one area in the league doesn't make the value change.
It would mean that it is easier to improve upon through the free markets (trade or sign). My point was that internally the Jets could have improved their goals for. They didn't have an internal option to improve their goaltending.
The one caveat being that the Jets often trailed early which impacts results (butterfly effect), causing them to play riskier which can lead to more goals against, worse save percentage, and more pk mins.
If we want to look at trade-offs, Lowry-Armia lines with Copp and with Matthias were 49.0% and 49.2% Corsi%. Their repression was fine, but their creation hurt the team relatively more than their suppression helped.
If you rather look at it through goals than Corsi, they were +15/-20 (which is actually worse than their Corsi%, but Jets had bad goaltending this year, so that is expected).
I would offer Ehlers for Hanifin
I don't want to trade away Laine's best friend. Trouba's been sulking since Bogo got sent to Buffalo!
Still - an XD-exempt left handed offensive defenseman who could step right in...be worth a lot to the Jets. Our 1st + Stanley? Lol. Okay 1st + Stanley + Petan?
I feel like there probably could be a deal around Ehlers/Connor for a young defenseman that could really help the Jets out in the long run but I'm not confident Hanifin is that guy.
Prior to this season I would have tried to go after Werenski but that's not going to be a possibility any more for sure.. I'm not really sure who else I would try to target at this point.
If we are moving Ehlers it has to be Werenski.
Not sure I would do that either. Have to stew on it a while.
Understood. But these things aren't always predictable. If the Jets reconfigured lines to improve scoring, they might have also ended up allowing even more goals against, especially if that line was facing potent opposition lines.
One interesting note confirmed the eye test and some of your analysis... Maurice said that one of the style / system changes this year was more movement and passing and less shot volume to enhance scoring chances and increase offensive zone time with fewer turnovers and transition against I'm not sure that's the best strategy, except it might work reasonably well for a line like Lowry's, especially when they are matched against tough offensive lines. According to Corsica, Lowry's line generated considerably more scoring chances than they conceded and had a positive xGF%. That sort of conforms to the eye test as they tend to have low shot volume and tend to cycle the puck until they getting a higher probability shot.
If only there was some stretch of games during the season where results didn't matter and we could experiment with wild flights of fancy like Petan with competent linemates...oh well.
If only there was some stretch of games during the season where results didn't matter and we could experiment with wild flights of fancy like Petan with competent linemates...oh well.
Well, Werenski isn't available.
At this point I am a bit less concerned about our defense than most of our posters for "NEXT SEASON". We will start out with 4.5 top D assets in:
Trouba
Buff
Morrissey
Myers
Enstrom.
That is a decent stable of assets so in my mind if we want to get a top 4 LHD man I would prefer trading Myers to get that as opposed to giving up a high end forward asset "yet". Now that Myers move would be making that massive assumption Jacob is part of our long term plans. If Jacob isn't part of our long term plans I assume that his trade will involve defensive assets coming back as in 1 for 1 which could solve the handedness in one swoop or more likely in a package deal where we could take Trouba and forward assets and bundle them to address both our top 4 D and our prospect depth at defense.
In summary I am not sweating it next season we have a nice looking top 5 D core.