Estimated_Prophet
Registered User
- Mar 28, 2003
- 10,347
- 10,505
He's trying to explain that Plekanec's scouting report showed he'd be a Bottom-6 player and he ended up becoming a Top-6 player, having multiple 50+ point seasons and had a few 60+ and one he had 70.
The point being, you can put a limit to a player when they're 18-20 years old. But the work they put in and the way they grow their game can exceed those limitations placed on them.
And it's an example for placing limitations on Mysak now.
I think the issue is that the "scouting report" was a very poor one. Any "scouting report" available to the public is not made by an actual scout, they are made by fans pretending to be scouts and it shows in the report that was quoted in this instance.
Calling Plekanec's speed "decent" and listing defensive play as a "weakness" after his first season in Hamilton is laughable. These are areas that fake scouts commonly are exposed in as most fans only see speed in guys who rush the puck and cheat to get breakaways. Plekanec was always a defensive minded player who's great speed only became obvious to the layman when his improving anticipation started leading to more breakaways.
Mysak's biggest weakness is his skating which has improved but is still below NHL average and entirely ends any reasonable discussion of him being the next Plekanec unless you are talking about the very end of his career where he had clearly lost a step or two.
I see Mysak's upside as a 30-40 point bottoms six player but more likely ends up a 20 - 30 point player.