Damn sympathizer!!!I never knew about the line until they saw the ice in-game. I was surprised at first, but am very glad it worked out well.
As a few people could tell you, I'm rarely inclined to doubt Babcock
Damn sympathizer!!!I never knew about the line until they saw the ice in-game. I was surprised at first, but am very glad it worked out well.
As a few people could tell you, I'm rarely inclined to doubt Babcock
We can expect some pretty decent spin on Hymans performance.....realists are never wrongThere were a couple people suggesting he wouldn't be as effective in the Playoffs, because he was already a hard-work guy, and everybody else would be upping their intensity once the games mattered.
I suggested Hyman could up his game as well, and he's not making me look stupid so far.
Without the two softees the game isn't as close. From my seat the Leafs never looked in danger of losing this one.That's true forgot about last change there.
Side note, to the people saying we dominated the game. What game were you watching? Very even game with the Leafs coming out on top. If we take a few more penalties we probably lose that game tbh, PK looks bottom 5 in the league right now. Boston also whiffed on empty netters, hit multiple posts, etc. It was a good win for us, but let's not get carried away. We can play much better, and hopefully we will on Thursday.
IMO. Stick with this line. Its the only time we shut down RAT,BERG and PASTA.
Kadri returning is a huge PLUS. But lest we forget how Berg Rat and Pasta outplayed Kadri.
If it aint broke...am i right
4 bad goals? We earned em. They weren't some ugly lucky bounces like Boston had gm 2 lol.
Yes. You can always swap Pleks & Kadri if they adapt to Pleks, but until then don't break them up.
Pleks made that line beatable, Kadri didn't.
We trust you Babs!
GO LEAFS GO!
That is not my point. Our defense still has major warts! Boston still had several opportunities to get back in that game! Andersen had to bail them out with huge saves.
Listen, I am all in favour of winning and I am happy there is no sweep, but come on. This is not a good defense!
Thanks for clearing that up.
So IIRC, you've said that xgf is the most reliable indicator of play. Based on that, last night was almost dead even, very slight edge to us which seems right.
Question - who complies the xgf numbers? I'm just wondering if there's bias from rink to rink or if we should be able to expect consistency across the board?
Can't wait to hear Dangle say LEEEEAAAAFS WIIIIN!
I had heard we traded for Tomas Plekanec, but never saw him until last night.
Nice option to have going forward now.
That's an interesting way to look at it. I'm sure if we erase Pasta Leafs probably win game two.Without the two softees the game isn't as close. From my seat the Leafs never looked in danger of losing this one.
I'm glad for him. Well deserved.
As one of the "hyman fanboys" it's good to see him take it up a notch. Impressive actually as I thought that's all the gears he had in the regular season
Hey @Walshy7 can we include playoff points in our bet?
Perhaps the Bruins were missing some of those chances because they were gripping their sticks a little tighter than usual?That's an interesting way to look at it. I'm sure if we erase Pasta Leafs probably win game two.
Bruins had 42 shots, they missed open nets, made our PK look bush league, hit posts and crossbars all night and also got robbed by the save of the playoffs. Boston did not get dominated. It was a class game. If you think we dominated Boston tonight I can only image the term you use for the past two games.
One thing Plekanec has over Kadri on that line is Bergeron and Marchand seem to really dislike him. He was in their heads all game.
Damn you!!!!!!!Sorry nope. Also I’ve grown a lot since that bet and I like Hyman now.
But not as much as I like winning bets
My post was one sentence and you got that lost. Seems you're a little bunched up for whatever reason, good luck.That's an interesting way to look at it. I'm sure if we erase Pasta Leafs probably win game two.
Bruins had 42 shots, they missed open nets, made our PK look bush league, hit posts and crossbars all night and also got robbed by the save of the playoffs. Boston did not get dominated. It was a class game. If you think we dominated Boston tonight I can only image the term you use for the past two games.
That's an interesting way to look at it. I'm sure if we erase Pasta Leafs probably win game two.
Bruins had 42 shots, they missed open nets, made our PK look bush league, hit posts and crossbars all night and also got robbed by the save of the playoffs. Boston did not get dominated. It was a class game. If you think we dominated Boston tonight I can only image the term you use for the past two games.
I agree, Boston didn't get dominated last night and the Leafs didn’t get dominated in game one, the score may say otherwise, but there were many shots on net and scoring chances for both teams.That's an interesting way to look at it. I'm sure if we erase Pasta Leafs probably win game two.
Bruins had 42 shots, they missed open nets, made our PK look bush league, hit posts and crossbars all night and also got robbed by the save of the playoffs. Boston did not get dominated. It was a class game. If you think we dominated Boston tonight I can only image the term you use for the past two games.
From watching that 3rd period, I thought we were lucky to win in the end. They missed more than a few Grade A chances (including the Andersen robbery at the end) that could have easily tipped the game in their favour.
The Leafs played much better than the first two games, but luck was definitely on our side in that game too. Without it, we definitely could have lost.
Damn you!!!!!!!
But welcome to the dark side