Is there any doubt that a Prime Jagr would have decimated this league?

tarheelhockey

Offside Review Specialist
Feb 12, 2010
85,339
139,136
Bojangles Parking Lot
He’s physically perfect for this league. Fast enough to play north-south, strong and heavy enough to bull through defenders. And some of the best handles you’ll ever see.

No reason he wouldn’t dominate today’s NHL just like he did in his 20s.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dar112

Dustin

Registered User
Sep 24, 2014
5,001
1,346
Gretzky would barely be able to play in the AHL but Jagr would be the greatest player of all time if he played today.

I mean if only they played at the same time, then we could see who was the better player. There's no way an older broken down Gretzky ever scored more than a younger version of Jagr. Never happened......
 
  • Like
Reactions: TheGoldenJet

LeafsLegendAkiBerg

The original great 8
Oct 12, 2006
3,982
2,084
Gretzky would barely be able to play in the AHL but Jagr would be the greatest player of all time if he played today.

I mean if only they played at the same time, then we could see who was the better player. There's no way an older broken down Gretzky ever scored more than a younger version of Jagr. Never happened......

Pfft, Gretzky would barely be an EHCL player today. Clearly Jagr was just going easy on poor old Wanye back then.
 

SC2GM

Registered User
May 16, 2016
333
147
Jagr is at 12 minutes of ice time per game, this season. No one in the league is going to be a PPG player at 12 minutes of ice time. His productivity is still on par with the best players in the game. At the moment, no one is destroying the league, and they're far from being 45 or 46. So, if I had to bet on someone to destroy the league, it would be a prime Jagr.
 

daver

Registered User
Apr 4, 2003
25,998
5,854
Visit site
Jagr is at 12 minutes of ice time per game, this season. No one in the league is going to be a PPG player at 12 minutes of ice time. His productivity is still on par with the best players in the game. At the moment, no one is destroying the league, and they're far from being 45 or 46. So, if I had to bet on someone to destroy the league, it would be a prime Jagr.

Jagr has a higher p/60 than McDavid therefore Jagr >McDavid.
 

Chimpradamus

Registered User
Feb 16, 2006
16,634
5,249
Northern Sweden
No, he wouldn't. He would struggle alot more in his prime than during these days. The game is alot faster, defenders aren't allowed to play lumberjacks (to his advantage), 4th lines aren't a joke with a goon gliding on the leathers of their skates to try to approach the other goon for the staged fight. They are actually an offensive threat given a chance and know how to play hockey. Goalies are infinitely better, teams actually have a system to defend and defensemen can actually skate, know how to block shots, cut off passing lanes and where to position themselves.

I get that you want to romanicise how things were, but no. Gretzky would never be close to his records against full pro teams, Lemieux would never have his scoring streaks and Jagr would never be able to dominate as he did. Just no.

Players like Gretzky, Orr and Lemieux were ahead of their era, but where they better? Heck no. They would still be stars, they would still be generational, but they would never produce the points they had, not even close. The reason they are seen as truly greats is because they were generational and ahead of their era, but they did play in a hockey game that was kind of a circus compared to today.

NHL players today are too well trained, too fit, skilled and smart enough that the absurd numbers during previous eras will never, ever be established again, because now they are actually professional teams down to the last line at 200 ft of the ice - and in the net. Even below average goalies are infinitely better than most goalies during previous eras. It's impossible.

That's why you can't compare players to different eras. It's a completely different game.
 
Last edited:

MikeK

Registered User
Nov 10, 2008
10,814
4,499
Earth
None of us knows. The only thing we can say for certain is that Jagr is one of the top players ever to play in the NHL.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dar112

B17 Apricots

Registered User
May 18, 2016
1,643
1,883


This is pretty much what I think of any time people bring up past players. I feel like it's just people with goofy emotional attachments. It'll be great in 20 years when the people growing up watching Ovi, Crosby, Karlsson, McDavid blabber away about how they would put up a billion points if they were still playing. The best is the crowd that genuinely thinks Gretzky would be putting up even more than his 215 in todays age.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cptjeff

Caged Great

Registered User
Jan 1, 2007
1,685
35
Calgary
Prime Jagr probably puts up 150 points this season due to the lack of being able to hook and hold him. Imagine a fast skating 6-5 230 pound monster that you can't interfere with and is one of the top scorers in NHL history.

He would destroy everything.
 

TheAngryHank

Expert
May 28, 2008
18,107
6,733
Look at it this way, what would the Devils ,Wings,Avs teams of the late 90s do to 2017 NHL ,regular season and playoffs.
 

authentic

Registered User
Jan 28, 2015
25,958
11,024
Prime Jagr probably puts up 150 points this season due to the lack of being able to hook and hold him. Imagine a fast skating 6-5 230 pound monster that you can't interfere with and is one of the top scorers in NHL history.

He would destroy everything.

He's 6'3 and he wouldn't approach 130 in this era, forget about 150. He would IMO dominate today as he did then, possibly a bit less. He would score around 100-110.
 

Kent Nilsson

Imagine cringing at Brock Nelson like a moron
Jan 31, 2016
4,478
4,301
These threads arent that far off from debating who would win a fight between batman and superman.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad