Is Alex Ovechkin a top 10 player of all time?

Is Alex Ovechkin a top 10 player of all time?


  • Total voters
    503
Status
Not open for further replies.

Bounces R Way

Registered User
Nov 18, 2013
34,501
54,814
Weegartown
When you look at how dominant a goal scorer he's been compared to his contemporaries I don't know how you keep him out of the top 10. Putting that little black rubber thing in the net is the entire point of the game.

The 2017-18 Stanley Cup and his Conn Smythe just put it in pen.
 
  • Like
Reactions: OKR

CanadienShark

Registered User
Dec 18, 2012
37,681
11,006
Gretzky, Lemiuex, Orr, Howe are obviously there. I have Jagr and Bourque in there too. After that, it becomes tougher. Ovechkin has a legit case, but so do like 10 others.
 

Midnight Judges

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Feb 10, 2010
13,653
10,287
Top 10 easily. Top 5 is the question.

Ovie is the greatest player of his generation - had the highest peak, leads in points, easily in primary points, while having 50% more goals than any other player (that's not a typo). No player in history has ever had that kind of goal scoring dominance. Ovie also has more Harts than anyone else, more Pearson nominations than any other player, and by far more hardware than any other player (17 major awards to Crosby's 11, and that's generously counting the Smythe that Sid obviously didn't earn).

Setting the all-time NHL goals record in a low scoring era would essentially mean Ovie has lapped the field in goal scoring. He wouldn't just have to be better at it than Gretzky, he'd have to be way better. Like, ~ 30% better.

Outside Howe and Gretzky - and to a far lesser extent Orr and Lemieux - Ovechkin's resume stacks up nicely against all the players from the 40s, 50s, 60s, 70s, and 80s. The key difference is that Ovechkin was playing in an international league and competing with an exponentially larger talent pool, whereas the players from the older decades were only competing against players from one small country, which itself has subsequently doubled in size. If a player's separation from the pack in 1965 is comparable to a player's separation in modern years, there is a solid rational basis for giving the edge to the modern player.
 
Last edited:

wetcoast

Registered User
Nov 20, 2018
22,694
10,435
He's not in my personal top-10 but I can see the argument for it.

Pretty much how I see it as well.

Top 10 forward for sure by now but there are some great Dmen and goalies all time as well.
 

daver

Registered User
Apr 4, 2003
26,004
5,861
Visit site
I think his transformation from an offensive force to a trigger man early in his career keeps him behind his direct peers Richard and Hull which keeps him out of the Top Ten.
 

Caps8112

Registered User
Sponsor
Aug 12, 2008
3,413
1,846
I think his transformation from an offensive force to a trigger man early in his career keeps him behind his direct peers Richard and Hull which keeps him out of the Top Ten.
Labeling Ovi a trigger man is the lazy way of putting ovi down on these boards. He does so much more then that but you have to watch the games...…..
 
  • Like
Reactions: ujju2

sufferer

Registered User
Dec 6, 2017
3,710
4,459
Labeling Ovi a trigger man is the lazy way of putting ovi down on these boards. He does so much more then that but you have to watch the games...…..
Yes, he was the trigger man for the esteemed playmaking duo of Dainius Zubrus and Chris Clark which allowed him to score 50 goals and 100 points in his rookie year.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dukeofjive

daver

Registered User
Apr 4, 2003
26,004
5,861
Visit site
Labeling Ovi a trigger man is the lazy way of putting ovi down on these boards. He does so much more then that but you have to watch the games...…..

No, he really doesn't. Predatory hits with no regard for defensive positioning don't impress me.

He, like Richard, Jagr and Hull, will be rated on his offensive exploits.
 

KoozNetsOff 92

Hala Madrid
Apr 6, 2016
8,567
8,229
No, he really doesn't. Predatory hits with no regard for defensive positioning don't impress me.

He, like Richard, Jagr and Hull, will be rated on his offensive exploits.

OV is better than Richard. More rockets, better goal finishes, more harts, more GPG leads, more PPG leads. Considering Richard played in a 6 team league and peaked in the post WWII seasons when the NHL was crap, OV has a better hart and AST record too imo. I don't really care about cups he stacked up on a dynasty in that weak era.

I won't get into OV vs Jagr, but Bobby Hull is interesting. Their regular seasons are similar: OV has 1 more rocket, Hull has more dominant wins. OV has 1 more hart, Hull has more nominations. Hull has 2 more rosses, OV has 1 more PPG win. Hull has 2 more 1st ASTs. Hull has more high end pt finishes. However, considering OV plays in a league with Europeans and Americans and obviously 31 teams instead of 6, I think that evens it out. OV would have even more awards (09 ross & 10 hart immediately come to mind), more ASTs, better pt/goal finishes and more dominant rocket wins if only facing Canadians. His regular season resume would probably be better than Hull's in that scenario but at the moment they are close enough. So playoffs. Each has 1 cup, obviously in Hull's day you only needed 4 wins to make the SCF so that's not exactly a fair comparison. OV's cup is worth more imo. The smythe wasn't awarded when Hull won his cup and it's arguable if he would have won as Pilote had more pts as a Dman and Mikita had 3 less pts but 2 more goals. So who knows, but let's give him the smythe anyway. In his era for playoffs, after removing Howe and Orr (and some guy who only played 7 games), Hull was 1st in GPG and 3rd in PPG.. Exactly the same as OV for his era. And again, give OV the same competition as Hull and he moves up to 2nd in PPG.

So what does Hull have that OV doesn't? Yes there's minor arguments each way, but there's nothing that should make Hull 5th (and a basically consensus top 10) and OV questionable to crack the top 10.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tacogeoff

MikeK

Registered User
Nov 10, 2008
10,841
4,570
Earth
Absolutely. When his career is all said and done he will likely be in the top 5 discussion.
 

GreatGonzo

Surrounded by Snowflakes
May 26, 2011
8,860
2,905
South Of the Tank
No, he really doesn't. Predatory hits with no regard for defensive positioning don't impress me.

He, like Richard, Jagr and Hull, will be rated on his offensive exploits.
You’re never impressed by Ovechkin because of your loyalty to Crosby, who’s defense you overrate to no end. It’s safe to say your option means little in anything to do with Ovechkin.
 

sr edler

gold is not reality
Mar 20, 2010
11,935
6,358
17 major awards to Crosby's 11, and that's generously counting the Smythe that Sid obviously didn't earn

I'm not in any boat here regarding these two players, but this is too silly. Ovi was out-pointed and generally out-played by his own line-mate during the 2018 playoffs. Kuznetsov was tap-dancing all over the ice, zone-entering like a maniac, setting up guys left and right with free candy, scored the series-winning goal against the arch-rivals, and out-pointed Ovi in the finals against Vegas.

Ovi scored 3 more goals than Kuznetsov. If Edmonton won the Cup in 2006 against Carolina should Fernando Pisani have won the Smythe over Pronger? He (Pisani) did score 9 more goals than Pronger after all those playoffs. :laugh:
 

nowhereman

Registered User
Jan 24, 2010
9,293
7,718
Los Angeles
You’re never impressed by Ovechkin because of your loyalty to Crosby, who’s defense you overrate to no end. It’s safe to say your option means little in anything to do with Ovechkin.
That goes both ways and the same could be said of your own bias for Ovechkin/against Crosby. In all honesty, most every Crosby vs. Ovechkin thread is just bias-driven mudslinging. It's the same posters going back and forth with the same tired arguments, neither able to really look at things objectively (if that's even possible with hockey).

Anyway, yeah, OV is in my top 10. It's a big mess after the big 4 but he's certainly in the mix with Beliveau, Sid, Hull, Richard, Harvey, Hasek, Jagr and Harvey. That said, I have him closer to #10 than #5.
 

Midnight Judges

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Feb 10, 2010
13,653
10,287
...scored the series-winning goal against the arch-rivals...

Who had the primary assist on that goal?

There were three back-breaking late 3rd period or OT game winning goals in that series. The primary points went to:

Ovechkin + Kuznetsov
Ovechkin + Vrana
Ovechkin + Backstrom

See a pattern?

Unlike you, I watched all those games. Ovie was the Caps' best player.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Randyne
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad