Malaka
you know, **** it, let’s just not think so much
The Chicago Blackhawks have acquired Brandon Saad and the rights to Nick Leddy for Alex Debrincat and Seth Jones(50% Retention)!!Rumor mill is very quiet, almost too quiet.
The Chicago Blackhawks have acquired Brandon Saad and the rights to Nick Leddy for Alex Debrincat and Seth Jones(50% Retention)!!Rumor mill is very quiet, almost too quiet.
k, byeIf the Hawks trade DeBrincat, I'm done for a while. Regardless of the return. This team can't become any more unwatchable, and they somehow would be.
I also think the desire to trade DeBrincat reeks of desperation. A new GM trying to make big waves and put his fingerprints on the team.
How often do teams trading a guy like DeBrincat actually win those trades? What would be a comparable trade, even? Superstars in their early 20's almost never get traded.
If only the same would happen with your insufferable ass once Strome is gone this summer.k, bye
Hockeyviz does those kinda well, don't really see the % listed but gamebygame it's visualAnyone have a chart by % or some metric to display who Cat played with the most each year?
Dobber frozen tools does itAnyone have a chart by % or some metric to display who Cat played with the most each year?
Do you consider Boston as winning the Joe Thornton trade?If the Hawks trade DeBrincat, I'm done for a while. Regardless of the return. This team can't become any more unwatchable, and they somehow would be.
I also think the desire to trade DeBrincat reeks of desperation. A new GM trying to make big waves and put his fingerprints on the team.
How often do teams trading a guy like DeBrincat actually win those trades? What would be a comparable trade, even? Superstars in their early 20's almost never get traded.
Anyone have a chart by % or some metric to display who Cat played with the most each year?
Were you against the Sox trading Sale and Quintana? It's the same concept.If the Hawks trade DeBrincat, I'm done for a while. Regardless of the return. This team can't become any more unwatchable, and they somehow would be.
I also think the desire to trade DeBrincat reeks of desperation. A new GM trying to make big waves and put his fingerprints on the team.
How often do teams trading a guy like DeBrincat actually win those trades? What would be a comparable trade, even? Superstars in their early 20's almost never get traded.
Why do you care? You're done with the team anywayIf only the same would happen with your insufferable ass once Strome is gone this summer.
Why do you care? You're done with the team anyway
31.7% with Kane and Strome this year.Anyone have a chart by % or some metric to display who Cat played with the most each year?
31.7% with Kane and Strome this year.
23 of his points at even strength came from that line (42.6%).
They both end up disappointedWhy do you care what I care about? Don't you have a Strome blow-up doll to pleasure somewhere?
I’d say Boston trading Kessel to Toronto was a better example of a team winning a trade where they trade away a star.Do you consider Boston as winning the Joe Thornton trade?
It baffles me some people don't see that as a win.
I guess more accurate would be say Torontos Phil Kessel or Dion Phaneuf trade aways, do you think they won or lost those? The goal was to tank and get Auston Matthews, they did. Now they've won absolutely nothing 6-7 years later, but most teams tanking for #1 win nothing for 7 years. So now it's up for them to finally make that worth it.
If Chicago gets good future assets and are extra terrible this year (and maybe next) with nobody but Kane scoring much... that's step 1 of winning the trade.
If the Hawks trade DeBrincat, I'm done for a while. Regardless of the return. This team can't become any more unwatchable, and they somehow would be.
I also think the desire to trade DeBrincat reeks of desperation. A new GM trying to make big waves and put his fingerprints on the team.
How often do teams trading a guy like DeBrincat actually win those trades? What would be a comparable trade, even? Superstars in their early 20's almost never get traded.
To further expand on this, of the last 10 Cup winners, only St. Louis didn’t have a former 1st or 2nd overall pick on their roster.love cat but if you're going to be bad then you might as well aim to be terrible and maximize his value now, could be the difference between a cup contending core in a few years or being good but not good enough...almost all the cup teams of the past decade plus had at least one 1st overall pick on the team, this team needs to maximize that equity before the pipeline is good and the team will need to transition out of the rebuild
Definitely get the sentiment but this team is going to blow for like 5 years before it gets any better. Stan Blowman really f***ed this team.If the Hawks trade DeBrincat, I'm done for a while. Regardless of the return. This team can't become any more unwatchable, and they somehow would be.
I also think the desire to trade DeBrincat reeks of desperation. A new GM trying to make big waves and put his fingerprints on the team.
How often do teams trading a guy like DeBrincat actually win those trades? What would be a comparable trade, even? Superstars in their early 20's almost never get traded.
I'm not sure why Seattle would be a player.DeBrincat is to this team what Amonte was to his past Hawks teams, good player on bad Hawks teams…
Hagel got us four quality assets in return, he was signed player at a very very cap friendly cost
DeBrincat should be able to get the same…as a soon to be RFA who will demand upwards of $8-9 million, much better player than Hagel, but remember TB also received a couple of picks with Hagel
So I’ll be happy if we receive four quality assets in return
Seattle? Philadephia?