Whileee
Registered User
- May 29, 2010
- 46,075
- 33,132
Good post.I guess if you never criticize management decisions and they have a really good season every 4 years, its probably satisfying to rub it in but the people serving up crow today are mostly the same people who were serving it up in the 'Thank You Chevy" thread in 2014-15 so really , how much do those opinions really matter?
I have been one of the harshest Chevy/Mo critics on this site and I picked the Jets to finish 2nd in the central before the season started, knowing that Maurice had been extended, so do I have to eat crow or do I get to serve it? I've made my share of terrible predictions throughout the years but the overall success of the team this year was not one of them. .920 goaltending is a magical thing and covers up a lot of weaknesses. Through the first 20 games, the Jets were lucky to be better than 7-13, in my opinion but Hellebuyck saved their season. Since the Kings game in LA, the overall team game has undergone one of the biggest fancy stats turnarounds since they started collecting data. Now they believe in themselves and they trust the goaltending and that momentum is very difficult to stop.
The more interesting things are *who* and *what* I was wrong about or would not have predicted:
- Lowry becoming a top end 3C and Selke candidate who can legitimately shut down other teams stars while also being able to beat Stamkos in a foot race?
- Steve Mason putting up .an .897 save percentage while the team gets all-star goaltending
- Being top 3 in combined special teams
- Kulikov out-performing expectations
- Tanev, despite his chipmunkian level of hockey IQ, causing enough havoc on the forecheck and drawing enough penalties to become a strong 5v5 player.
Things I am not ready to concede:
- Myers being a good top 4 defenseman. He is very dangerous when he is skating and the puck is on his stick in the offensive zone but he is quite bad at defending and in the other 2 zones and when he is trying to pass.
- Chiarot. Although he has looked better (which happens a lot with .920 goaltending and on top possession teams), we need an upgrade before the trade deadline. I still have him as a below replacement player.
- Maurice. It was interesting that when we lost several players to injury, the replacements (i.e., the people Mo didn't like - Dano/Roslovic/soon to be Petan?) were as good or better than the people they were replacing, at least to my eye. One good season every 5 year is not enough to change my opinion on the losingest coach in history but there is no doubt he has the team believing in themselves and playing excellent hockey. Does that erase 3 years of very bad hockey, with a lot of the same lineup? Not for me and not yet.
- Chevy. F-. Lmao. J/k. We will never know what the team would look like today if Chevy had his way in July of 2015 and re-signed Ladd to 6 years, traded Buff and then didn't win the draft lottery and ended up with Sergachev or Jost? I don't think it would be better. Laine is a franchise changing player. Chevy has definitely grown in the job and excels at some parts - namely contracts/cap management and amateur scouting has been destroying the draft but from 2011 through Sept 2017 he also made some objectively terrible decisions.
As I posted above, I think the discourse on this board would have been much better if the discussions had kept to well-formed opinions about Maurice and Chevy, good or bad. It became toxic when some chose to incorporate ad hominem remarks and comments to the discussions. "Apologists", "lovers", "trained seals", etc... those appellations really added nothing to the discussion.