I think you missed the point here.
In regards to Holloway, he's a replacement. How can a replacement be in competition weight/shape 6 days before the event? I get it. If Holloway walks around at 145-155 all year then it's not a problem right? But really...most athletes aren't in peak condition when they aren't expected to compete...In my mind what this does is hurt the people who paid good money to see the show to have their main event cancelled. Holloway already had an upcoming fight, he doesn't need the extra fight.
So be it. You make it sound like canceling fights doesn't happen. It does. Also allowing fighters to take on fights 6 days before is another sign they don't give two shits about their fighters.
Like I said, if the health of their fighters was their priority, they wouldn't allow these things.
Now this where frequency comes in, they do random drug testing for fighters even if they're out of competition. Do you do random weighing for out of competition fighters? What for? Would Holloway need to step on a scale 3 months ago for the hell of it? What makes this even more perplexing is drug testing isn't done the typical way when you go to a clinic or whatever. USADA collects the sample, unannounced, in person. So unless they want a fraud system they'd have to travel to the person, bring their own scale and make him step on it. For what? Weight can fluctuate wildly. I lost 15 lbs in a month eating wtv I wanted. A professional athlete under a diet plan can make gains/lose weight even quicker I'm sure depending on their starting weight. So you'll test out of competition people monthly for weight? It's nice to live in a fantasy land but they'd go broke. That's nuts.
You start weigh in for confirmed fights 2 months before the fight, or 45 days. It's honestly incredibly simple. You do random weigh in, can be done by video call.
Honestly, a few trial and errors, you find the best system. Easy, simple, and done.
And even if they want to operate on a random note, in person. Starting 60-45 days out of a fight, fighters can be randomly selected for weigh in. It wouldn't cost them all that much. UFC is a billion dollar industry, they would be just fine. Go broke...ya right, that's funny.
The logical answer is "well only weigh fighters who have upcoming fights", sure...then back to square one. Holloway and others wouldn't be eligible for the fight leaving the main event slot empty...
So? It happens. Holloway shouldn't even have agreed to the fight anyways. Coming off a foot injury, hasn't fought since, no training camp, going to heavier weight class, against the top contender.
Ya, that is stupid in and of itself already. That shouldn't happen to begin with.
It sucks, but main events sometimes don't come through.
But they don't care about their fighters, so they allow this to happen. Just like they allow insane weight cuts.
Don't get me wrong, I'm not a big fan of the dramatic weight cuts but at a certain point these guys are responsible for themselves. They will never ever get sued for weight cuts, ever.
Well that really doesn't have much to do with what was the discussion. You said it would be very difficult or impossible to control weight cuts better, I said it would be very simple. Whether it's the athletes fault or it would be expensive is besides the point.
Fact is they could do it.
Mark Hunt of the UFC was livid about fighting guys who tested positive for PEDs and actually sued the UFC for Lesnar's failed test:
“LESNAR, WHITE, and UFC, acted in concert as set forth fully above, to defraud HUNT and commit a battery against HUNT by a scheme to knowingly pit HUNT, a clean fighter, against LESNAR, a doping fighter, to the wrongful benefit of Defendants and to the detriment of HUNT,” the complaint reads.
There's a simple reason why...because he claims that the UFC put his health in danger by making him face an unclean fighter. I repeat, he's blaming the UFC for something OUT of his control. Blaming the UFC because you're not at the weight you signed up for is something IN your control. They'd never get sued for it.
Again, this doesn't have much to do with my point.
But for the record, Mark Hunt fought in Pride, where taking PEDs was encouraged. They flat out state in their contracts that athletes will not be tested for PEDs. Never heard Hunt complain about this, have you?
Also if they lifted this dumb PED ban, then Hunt wouldn't have been able to sue.
And who cares if they can't get sued over weight cut? What does this have to do with anything?
I think it's nice that we all want an even playing field and healthy competitors. Who doesn't? Realize that proper weight testing to deter heavy cutting whilst ensuring the show will go on is A) insanely expensive and B) impossible in the format you are suggesting(You suggest just cancel the main card and you can't replace it...)
A) You have no idea what the cost would be. None.
B) There is nothing impossible. Main events have been canceled before.
I don't care about the even playing field, I think PEDs should be legal. I said I find it ironic how they allow the weight cuts but ban PEDs, because they really do not give two shits about the health of their athletes. Random weigh ins for confirmed fighters up to 60 days prior to a fight. Not expensive, and easily applicable. But they have absolutely nothing to gain out of this, except keeping fighters a bit healthier....so they will never do it. Until someone suffers long term serious health issues due to those insane weight cuts and they get sued for negligence.
The solution will need to be more complex than "weigh them X weeks before" because it fails to consider replacements, out of competition fighters, the drastic fluctuation in weight. PEDs can stay in your system for a few months correct? Some athletes have been known to cut 5-10 lbs just competing. NFL Linemen can lose 3% of their body fat. Dan Ellis claimed he lost about 13 lbs a game. Weight is fluctuates a lot more than testing. You know this. I'm all for additional testing but it has to make sense. Not to mention USADA exists without the UFC as a government anti doping agency. The UFC will need some random company to step up and do an 'anti-weight cut' agency which to my knowledge doesn't exist...
There is no ''drastic fluctuation in weight''. You don't wake up one day 15 lbs lighter without having done something very impactful. I have been at 88kg for 6 months. I train 5-8x per week, I eat pretty much the same every week.
What does Dan Ellis sweating 13lbs of water weight during a game has to do with this??
Again, it's pretty simple. You are 60 days out? You are allowed to be 15lbs over weight limit. 30 days out, 10lbs. You threaten fighters with random weight cuts.
If the fighter doesn't make weight, he's out. You seek out replacement fighters who do fit the weight limit. Just like Holloway was at the right weight to take over now. It's the same damn thing.
Like I said, you're just trying to find excuses but in reality, it would be very simple.
Sure, you'd have to spend some money and organize it all, so yes, it would require cash and work. But totally doable.
So again, we both want the same thing but I think you underestimate how difficult/unnecessary it is in certain cases. How much these rules will impact the fans. How no agency even does this type of testing yet, etc...
It would make their lives more complicated, sure, and they don't want to waste money when they don't have to, so it's not going to happen. But it wouldn't be difficult at all to do if they actually wanted to go through with it.