ReggieRed
Good job. Good work. Good goal next!
Beat me to it!
"Mommy, you should have heard the words that the man in the suit just said when his team took a penalty!"
How soon until we are at "what you see is what you get"? Something has to regress to mean and I'm hoping that means more offense versus more losses...Would like to believe our forwards have at least a little more to giveBack to ugly wins. Good night for the CBJ in the standings. I don't care that Tort's doesn't want to talk about the standings, he doesn't want to talk about the PP either.
I'm sure it was a slightly more paint-peeling version of "I am dissapoint".Beat me to it!
"Mommy, you should have heard the words that the man in the suit just said when his team took a penalty!"
How soon until we are at "what you see is what you get"? Something has to regress to mean and I'm hoping that means more offense versus more losses...Would like to believe our forwards have at least a little more to give
Wennberg with 0% on FO, new record.
Did he even play? Didn’t notice him once
I am convinced you guys literally enjoyed it more when this team was terrible.
Who said the team is terrible. You might not like some of the normal rhetoric that goes on in here but there are things that must be improved on if they want to make the playoffs. They are five points from being out of a playoff spot and they aren't going to keep winning scoring 1 or 2 goals a game. Do you not see anything that might have you a bit concerned about the lack of scoring on this team outside of the first line? Do you not see the defensive breakdowns, the odd man rushes and all the breakaways they have been giving up? Do you not have any concerns with the 9% PP? I don't think anyone is out of line asking these questions.
Not a fair thing to say. We're all Blue Jacket fans. I was at opening night aginst the Blackhawks and with them ever since. There's nothing wrong with constructive criticism.I am convinced you guys literally enjoyed it more when this team was terrible.
Wennberg ???? I told you so ...............
It would be awesome if the CBJ were ranked #1 in every team category, however, I'm ok with them winning 2 out of every 3 games and being close to if not the division leader, like they have over the last 100+ games. Especially with the extreme parity in the league.
Last year we were supposedly "lucky" to be winning because the PP was so good. This year we are "lucky" to be winning because or PP is so bad. So which is it?
Or is this team not lucky to be winning, and is simply good?
There is nothing "wrong" with this team, on offense, on defense, or in net.
There is nothing "wrong" with this team, in terms of toughness, leadership, experience, chemistry or SKILL.
Wennberg with 0% on FO, new record.
Great reply. We could easily be on the playoff bubble if over the next 20-30 games our fortunes reverse a bit, like not going 7-1 in OT, Bob slips a little bit, 5 v 5 play worsens, etc... the Metro is a very tough division (remember when we all wanted CBJ to get out of the really tough western conference? Lol)
Both?
Who said the team is terrible. You might not like some of the normal rhetoric that goes on in here but there are things that must be improved on if they want to make the playoffs. They are five points from being out of a playoff spot and they aren't going to keep winning scoring 1 or 2 goals a game. Do you not see anything that might have you a bit concerned about the lack of scoring on this team outside of the first line? Do you not see the defensive breakdowns, the odd man rushes and all the breakaways they have been giving up? Do you not have any concerns with the 9% PP? I don't think anyone is out of line asking these questions.