Rumor: Galiardi on the trading block

[Kitten Mittons]

Why does DW insist on trading away my favorite players? It's like he's asking me to hate him.

 

[hockfan1991]

Also I'd much rather get rid of Burish And have Galiardi at half 1 million less that makes so much more sense. Burish Should be on the block not Galiardi

 

[TomasHertlsRooster]

Please keep TJ...ugh...

 

[Barrie22]

I don't get why we traded a 2nd for Kennedy then try and trade Galiardi. Counter productive unless we get a it is for another young forward that fits better with us.

probably answered early in this thread but just never read it.

you do realize galiardi isn't signed right? galiardi basically can be saying i won't sign unless it is 3 million for 4 years (very high price i know but you get my point).

if wilson knows that galiardi is to high of a price tag to sign, then what do you want wilson to do, let galiardi sit at home or get the best available deal for him?

 

[murdock1116]

Also I'd much rather get rid of Burish And have Galiardi at half 1 million less that makes so much more sense. Burish Should be on the block not Galiardi

This times 10!

If he is having trouble with cap and what not, I would much rather overpay Galiardi and get rid of Burish, than to trade TJ.

Though maybe Burish on his contract can't even land you a 7th.

 

[LeeIFBB]

The trade that keeps on giving.

Ship him out, or don't. Go to arb, or don't. He is a nothing player pissing away a great opportunity.

 

[spintheblackcircle]

Galiardi for Clowe.

 

[Hatrick Marleau]

probably answered early in this thread but just never read it.

you do realize galiardi isn't signed right? galiardi basically can be saying i won't sign unless it is 3 million for 4 years (very high price i know but you get my point).

if wilson knows that galiardi is to high of a price tag to sign, then what do you want wilson to do, let galiardi sit at home or get the best available deal for him?

Yes I know he isn't signed. That could be the reason why he wants to trade him. I don't think TJ feels he is worth 3mil a year yet though.

 

[hockfan1991]

This times 10!

If he is having trouble with cap and what not, I would much rather overpay Galiardi and get rid of Burish, than to trade TJ.

Though maybe Burish on his contract can't even land you a 7th.

We signed him as a free agent. Future considerations at this point would be fine with me. I would much rather have Galiardi at Burish money or possibly a little less they have to get rid of TJ. I still believe he can be a solid forty point guy if we give him time to mesh and Keep him out of the press box. He's five or six Years younger than Bertish and even in this down season we didn't play much he was on pace for like 35 points why the hell would we get rid of him over Burish. who knows he might ba able to top out as a 50 point guy when put in the right situation this is pointless

 

[magic school bus]

probably answered early in this thread but just never read it.

you do realize galiardi isn't signed right? galiardi basically can be saying i won't sign unless it is 3 million for 4 years (very high price i know but you get my point).

if wilson knows that galiardi is to high of a price tag to sign, then what do you want wilson to do, let galiardi sit at home or get the best available deal for him?

Then Wilson needs to stop being such a whimp and realize no one's giving Galiardi $3M a season. Let him sit there unsigned and we'll match the offer sheet if it comes.

 

[glasgow26]

How do you guys propose we get rid of Burish? Seriously, it's not as easy as saying, "Let's drop Burish and give Galiardi that money!"

Burish is a fourth liner signed for three more years with a $1.8M cap hit. No team will touch that. Plus, DW and TMac are probably fine with keeping Burish on the team in a fourth line role. The guy played almost every game for us last year, so the staff obviously likes him.

 

[greatwhiteshark]

I'm not saying they will, but they could use a compliance buyout on him. I don't know if their planning to buy anyone else out, so they could use their second compliance on Havlat next year if things don't work out. We all know Burish isn't worth almost 2 mil, so buy him out and use the cap space to sign guys T.J who could be a third/fourth liner. If needed be he could also step up with Thornton and Burns, not very effective but it has been proven to work out alright.

Im pretty sure teams can only use compliance buyouts on players who make over $3M a year. Burish will stay, he better bounce back and prove he is worth his absurd contract.

 

[Barrie22]

Then Wilson needs to stop being such a whimp and realize no one's giving Galiardi $3M a season. Let him sit there unsigned and we'll match the offer sheet if it comes.

gali is not that important of a piece to this sharks team, i know some of you like him. but he is nothing that is not replaceable easily. if wilson can get another warm body to take his place, or even a draft pick ( i know how much some of you just love those draft picks, its almost like winning the cup to some of you when the sharks have draft picks)

 

[do0glas]

Hopefully he raised his value in the stretch run/playoffs. But we are still just trading his rfa rights. Won't net us much. Thinking a late pick or a decent prospect

 

[Audio Outlaw]

Galiardi is nothing special. Brink in Korpikoski.

 

[Nighthock]

Why does DW insist on trading away my favorite players? It's like he's asking me to hate him.

why don't you start liking Burish

 

[magic school bus]

gali is not that important of a piece to this sharks team, i know some of you like him. but he is nothing that is not replaceable easily. if wilson can get another warm body to take his place, or even a draft pick ( i know how much some of you just love those draft picks, its almost like winning the cup to some of you when the sharks have draft picks)

I don't think he's important either but I'd rather keep Gali for another year rather than risk rushing Hertl because our next best option is Bracken Kearns.

 

[hockeyball]

I don't think he's important either but I'd rather keep Gali for another year rather than risk rushing Hertl because our next best option is Bracken Kearns.

Nieto, Hamilton, Stalberg, Oleksuk. We actually should have several better options this year.

 

[Gene Parmesan]

If he wants too much let him walk.

 

[BaileyMacTavish]

Is TJ taking this to Arbitration again? If so, I can see why he's on the block.

 

[Barrie22]

Is TJ taking this to Arbitration again? If so, I can see why he's on the block.

find out in a day or 2, i believe arb notifications have to be put in soon.

 

[drumzan]

Burmistrov for TJ

LOL, oh man I don't even know where to start...

 

[Barrie22]

LOL, oh man I don't even know where to start...

you can start with a

 

[TomasHertlsRooster]

Galiardi is nothing special. Brink in Korpikoski.

The grass is not actually always greener. Even if we got Korpikoski, it would still be smart to keep TJ.

We don't have enough top-9 wingers with speed, but lets ge rid of one of them because he didn't scoar a lot of pointz and there's a different player with more pointz that's potentially available

Just stop dude.

 

[Gene Parmesan]

The grass is not actually always greener. Even if we got Korpikoski, it would still be smart to keep TJ.

We don't have enough top-9 wingers with speed, but lets ge rid of one of them because he didn't scoar a lot of pointz and there's a different player with more pointz that's potentially available

Just stop dude.

Why does he need to stop? Hes right. TJ isn't anything special at all. If he takes the Sharks to arbitration again they will trade him or let him walk.