Prospect Info: Filip Chytil (Pick #21 2017)

Levitate

Registered User
Jul 29, 2004
31,036
7,806
Paying for someone else's opinion is silly...

They do some good stories with interesting information...it's not just opinion. In theory it's letting sports writers actually do some journalism and write about interesting things, delve into more detail than they could working for newspapers, etc.

But it's drawing away all of the beat writers and is probably unsustainable as a subscription service without a big numbers increase and was basically started with VC money
 

kovazub94

Enigmatic
Aug 5, 2010
12,448
8,285
Absolutely agree. It's one thing for $10 draft guide that has a lot of good info that is hard to find on the internet, but for random articles? No thanks.

Disagree. As Levitate said you are paying for journalism from a professional by trade and / or education without influence of ownership, editors or major sponsors. Whether it is worth it or not depends on how you value this.
 

Brooklyn Ranger

Registered User
Feb 27, 2002
9,462
298
Brooklyn, of course
Yes. His contract will slide when he is in the AHL, unless he plays 7 more games for the Rangers in a season.

Actually, Chytil would have to play in 8 more NHL games to burn a year off his contract. A total of 9 games would not trigger it. Suspect he'll stay in the AHL unless he really begins to dominate. Only reason I'd send him back to his team in the Czech Rep would be if he could play in the Olympics.
 

Amazing Kreiderman

Registered User
Apr 11, 2011
44,859
40,367
Actually, Chytil would have to play in 8 more NHL games to burn a year off his contract. A total of 9 games would not trigger it. Suspect he'll stay in the AHL unless he really begins to dominate. Only reason I'd send him back to his team in the Czech Rep would be if he could play in the Olympics.

Sorry. I thought he played 3 already.
 

Irishguy42

Mr. Preachy
Sep 11, 2015
26,823
19,086
NJ
According to McCambridge, it's not serious and they said he'll be back soon.

Just a puck to the foot last game.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ori

RangerBoy

Dolan sucks!!!
Mar 3, 2002
44,958
21,337
New York
www.youtube.com
The main draw to Chytil is his skating. He's got one of the most fluid strides I've seen in a while, making him an effortless skater. He's the type of player that has sneaky speed. As a defender, it doesn't looks like he's coming at you at lightning speed, but you're chasing him two strides later.

Like all of the NHL's top-end skaters, Chytil has gears. His lower body is well built, giving him advantages in three skating categories. The first, his top speed, which he uses to win puck races and get separation on breakaways is good. Against his own age group, he routinely blew past players. In his first few games in the AHL, he doesn't seem to have any trouble with the speed at which his competition plays either.

The second, his puck carrying speed, particularly through the neutral zone, makes him a controlled zone entry machine. In his first weekend in the AHL, the defensemen were so focused on Chytil's speed through the neutral zone, they completely missed his teammates (who eventually got the puck) skate by him. At the U18s, Chytil was ripping defensive schemes apart with his speed and ability to shift weight to slip through checks. He's a very slick, slippery skater when he has the puck and that will only get better.

The third is his acceleration, where the lower body is key. The NHL has all but removed the ability of defending players to slow the puck carrier. A tap on the hands or pants is a slash, and anything parallel to the ice is a hook. This is a huge advantage for players who can get to top speed in one or two strides the way Chytil can. Defenders aren't going to be able to slow him up the way they used to, which means the likelihood he gets the puck and strides by them increases, creating more scoring opportunities. When you combine the acceleration with the fluid stride, Chytil can easily change direction and dart in and out of areas, creating a nightmare for defenders.

Chytil doesn't have the heavy offensive upside that the players taken before him do. He doesn't project to be a top line pivot, but that isn't what he was drafted to be. The Rangers have Zibanejad and Andersson. Chytil is projected to be a really good, dependable, two-way pivot with the ability to put the puck in the net. His skating is NHL ready and then some, he moves the puck well, and his shot has the potential to be a big weapon. He understands the defensive side of the game and where he needs to be, one of the biggest hurdles for a young pivot. Once he gets a little stronger and grows into his body, he should contribute the way Couturier and Kadri contribute to their teams. That is, a good two-way player, capable of being the matchup (shutdown) guy, that plays both sides of special teams, and can contribute offensively. With the NHL moving toward speed and scoring, having a pivot who can skate on both sides of the puck and contribute offensively is key to being successful. The Rangers have a good one in Chytil, he will be a key piece of their future.


 
  • Like
Reactions: Fvital92

Revel

Dark Sky Enthusiast
Oct 20, 2015
6,189
243
Dunning–Krugerville
Strange article. IMO, Lias is the guaranteed solid 2-way guy, and Filip is the one with the higher offensive upside (if he puts it all together). Very possible he develops into a Top Liner.

This is why I don't pay for content.

Our posters here that have followed Chytil since Traverse are more familiar with his current game and have a better idea of his potential. Their rhetoric may not be as flowery as a professional journalist's ... but there's more actual substance and less hot air.
 

Edge

Kris King's Ghost
Mar 1, 2002
34,749
42,578
Amish Paradise
Frankly, I think the article has it reversed.

Andersson is the two-way pivot who probably doesn't center your top line, but can play in a bunch of different situations. If he develops, ideally, he's the type of player who isn't your most talented player, doesn't lead the team in scoring, isn't your flashiest player, and yet he's one of your most valuable members. When you talk about putting together winning teams, you looks for guys who are what the Rangers hope Andersson can someday be.

As for Chytil, it was about upside and unknowns. The talent was there, but there were more moving parts - growth spurts, confidence, experience, opportunity, assertiveness, youth. You're talking about a player who is almost a full year younger than Andersson. The general consensus was/is that Chytil's offensive ceiling is higher, but his probability of being an NHL player was seen as being not as "safe" as Andersson's odds.

The reality is that even the Rangers are still trying to get a better idea of just how good Chytil can become. Obviously they know he's talented, but you're also talking about a prospect who was younger than most and had even more ground to cover.

A few posts back I talked about the biggest advances in Chytil's game this season. In addition to being (substantially) bigger and stronger than he was a year ago, he's finding confidence and assertiveness to go with that size. Last year, Chytil was a 16/17 year old testing himself against grown men, in his home country, and learning whether he could hang with them. This year, Chytil is going out there and knowing he can not only hang with guys 10 years older than him, but that he can also outplay them.
 
Last edited:

Revel

Dark Sky Enthusiast
Oct 20, 2015
6,189
243
Dunning–Krugerville
Frankly, I think the article has it reversed.

Andersson is the two-way pivot who probably doesn't center your top line, but can play in a bunch of different situations. If he develops, ideally, he's the type of player who isn't your most talented player, doesn't lead the team in scoring, isn't your flashiest player, and yet he's one of your most valuable members. When you talk about putting together winning teams, you looks for guys who are what the Rangers hope Andersson can someday be.

As for Chytil, it was about upside and unknowns. The talent was there, but there were more moving parts - growth spurts, confidence, experience, opportunity, assertiveness, youth. You're talking about a player who is almost a full year younger than Andersson. The general consensus was/is that Chytil's offensive ceiling is higher, but his probability of being an NHL player was seen as being not as "safe" as Andersson's odds.

The reality is that even the Rangers are still trying to get a better idea of just how good Chytil can become. Obviously they know he's talented, but you're also talking about a prospect who was younger than most and had even more ground to cover.

A few posts back I talked about the biggest advances in Chytil's game this season. In addition to being (substantially) bigger and stronger than he was a year ago, he's finding confidence and assertiveness to go with that size. Last year, Chytil was a 16/17 year old testing himself against grown men, in his home country, and learning whether he could hang with them. This year, Chytil is going out there and knowing he can not only hang with guys 10 years older than him, but that he can also outplay them.

...and this is a prime example of why I don't need to pay for Rachel Doerrie (or anyone else writing for The Athletic). Great post.
 

Alluckks

Gabriel Perreault Fan Account
Sponsor
Nov 2, 2011
7,639
7,559
The only hockey content I would pay for is a podcast or something that has hours of content for a long trip - but those are free as well. Revenue comes from views and associated advertisements nowadays, the paid subscription is going the way of the do-do bird unless you are something like Netflix.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

  • Inter Milan vs Torino
    Inter Milan vs Torino
    Wagers: 5
    Staked: $2,752.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:
  • Metz vs Lille
    Metz vs Lille
    Wagers: 3
    Staked: $354.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:
  • Cádiz vs Mallorca
    Cádiz vs Mallorca
    Wagers: 3
    Staked: $340.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:
  • Bologna vs Udinese
    Bologna vs Udinese
    Wagers: 4
    Staked: $365.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:
  • Clermont Foot vs Reims
    Clermont Foot vs Reims
    Wagers: 1
    Staked: $15.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:

Ad

Ad