SPF6ty9
Registered User
He played great last night though. That play on the Chabot goal was classic Karlsson. Be a shame not to see that tandem together again.
Considering you don't know how to spell "peace", I'm not sure how sincere your post is.I didn't want to start off the stampede of Karlsson to my team threads on the main boards so Bruins fan coming in piece.
Carlo, Lauzon, JFK, Heinen for Karlsson
That sound about right?
Numerology #65... Pretty freaky .... when the starts align.
I blame Dorion just as much for not having the backbone to stand up to it.
Eugene would just sack him. My conspiracy theory is that the 3 year extension was given under the agreement that Dorion trades EK.
Dorion would be out of a job in hockey for about 5 minutes. IF he made that deal with Melnyk, then he deserves the backlash he is going to face from fans.Eugene would just sack him. My conspiracy theory is that the 3 year extension was given under the agreement that Dorion trades EK.
Maybe we should wait until the Titanic hits the iceberg before warning the captain.Maybe we should wait until he actually gets traded before getting worked up.
Maybe we should wait until the Titanic hits the iceberg before warning the captain.
Fair, but in the same way that my analogy was a bit of a false equivalency, I think yours is too. I don't see anyone casting off now – I see people saying "Hey, if we hit this iceberg I'm going to be casting out." A far more reasonable approach than the latter, which would be equivalent to "We're talking about trading Karlsson so I'm not a fan anymore. Screw this."I feel like you warning the captain about an iceberg in the ship's path would likely lead to him avoiding it. I'm really not sure how the two situations compare.
EK being traded is not a foregone conclusion, so why treat it as such? It would appear to be a possibility for certain, but waiting to see the outcome before reacting seems prudent.
I mean, it wouldn't make much sense to start loading up the life boats and cast off into the middle of the North Atlantic until AFTER something happens to the ship no?
Fair, but in the same way that my analogy was a bit of a false equivalency, I think yours is too. I don't see anyone casting off now – I see people saying "Hey, if we hit this iceberg I'm going to be casting out." A far more reasonable approach than the latter, which would be equivalent to "We're talking about trading Karlsson so I'm not a fan anymore. Screw this."
Or maybe the fan reaction to the possibility of Karlsson being traded gives Sens management sober second thought on going through with the deal.I feel like you warning the captain about an iceberg in the ship's path would likely lead to him avoiding it. I'm really not sure how the two situations compare.
EK being traded is not a foregone conclusion, so why treat it as such? It would appear to be a possibility for certain, but waiting to see the outcome before reacting seems prudent.
I mean, it wouldn't make much sense to start loading up the life boats and cast off into the middle of the North Atlantic until AFTER something happens to the ship no?
So we know Mark Stone isn't coming back this season.
Assuming Duchene doesn't catch him in the next couple of games, with Karlsson being tied for the team lead in points, does that mean he's tied the D man record for 4 straight seasons leading his team in points?
With the usual caveats being Stone would clearly have led the team but didn't due to injury, and Duchene amassed some of his points elsewhere. Doesn't matter, at the end of the year what's the total point count right?
So we know Mark Stone isn't coming back this season.
Assuming Duchene doesn't catch him in the next couple of games, with Karlsson being tied for the team lead in points, does that mean he's tied the D man record for 4 straight seasons leading his team in points?
With the usual caveats being Stone would clearly have led the team but didn't due to injury, and Duchene amassed some of his points elsewhere. Doesn't matter, at the end of the year what's the total point count right?
I feel like you warning the captain about an iceberg in the ship's path would likely lead to him avoiding it. I'm really not sure how the two situations compare.
EK being traded is not a foregone conclusion, so why treat it as such? It would appear to be a possibility for certain, but waiting to see the outcome before reacting seems prudent.
I mean, it wouldn't make much sense to start loading up the life boats and cast off into the middle of the North Atlantic until AFTER something happens to the ship no?