Johnny GODreau
Boom
- Aug 21, 2014
- 8,582
- 22
The **** was the point of getting 50% retention on Lack, if we were going to eat cap hit on a Murphy buyout?
Just take less retention and don't acquire Murphy...
Or why not just send him to the AHL?
Murphy's buyout is tiny as he's under the age of 25; it's one/third instead of two/thirds over twice the years.
It's like 233k combined for two years. That's nothing, but still; you're buying him out, so you have you pay him; you're going to pay him either way,why not have him in the AHL?
Well I guess Murphy won't be playing here then
Any idea who he is butt punching there?
Well I guess Murphy won't be playing here then
Still think the Flames think he's better than Kulak?
so many blondes...