Devils 2017-18 team discussion (player news and notes) V - Trade Deadline Madness

Status
Not open for further replies.

Bleedred

Travis Green BLOWS! Bring back Nasreddine!
Sponsor
May 1, 2011
130,264
57,681
Zajac was listed at 205-210 in college, so he's actually leaner now than he was back then. Also, his bad haircuts have apparently always been a thing.

25utpjo.jpg
Yikes! I can see the more fullness in his face. He was listed at 210 just a few years ago. I didn't realize he was 185 until someone posted it on here and said the strength and conditioning coach should be fired for not having him build some muscle haha. I actually thought it was a mistake, but here we are a couple years later and he's listed at 185.

I really wonder why he would lose 20-25 pounds around 30 years old, when he wasn't really that big to begin with? The only thing that I can think of is to get quicker.
 

MadDevil

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Feb 10, 2007
33,834
23,706
Bismarck, ND
The game is faster than ever and there's not as much grinding it out along the boards, so he probably decided to get lighter and quicker. I think other players around the league have done it too. Zajac just needs to take it easier with his offseason workouts. The only two major injuries he's had weren't even during the actual season.
 

JimEIV

Registered User
Feb 19, 2003
66,192
28,542
Hmmm...this sounds exactly like Keith Kinkaid, who pretty much sucked up until about a month ago. Maybe we should use the totality of the season rather than selective sample sizes to judge players?
Except that is another of the many false narratives of this board...look up the game logs they are your friend..

Keith Kinkaid 2017-18 Game Log | Hockey-Reference.com

October Keith got 4 starts 3-1 with a .910 Sv%

November 2-0-1 .903 sv%

December 0-2 .848% .

January 3-1-1 .908%

February 7-4 .909 SV%

March 3-1 .921 Sv%

Keith never sucked. It is a bull shit made up narrative. Completely made up. A HF special - made up nonsense that gets regurgitated until it is just accepted as truth
 
Last edited:

Triumph

Registered User
Oct 2, 2007
13,534
13,911
Except that is another of the many false narratives of this board...look up the game logs they are your friend..

Keith Kinkaid 2017-18 Game Log | Hockey-Reference.com

October Keith got 4 starts 3-1 with a .910 Sv%

November 2-0-1 .903 sv%

December 0-2 .848% .

January 3-1-1 .908%

February 7-4 .909 SV%

March 3-1 .921 Sv%

Keith never sucked. It is a bull **** made up narrative. Completely made up.

Having two games in December where Kinkaid stopped fewer than 6 out of 7 shots tanked his SV% and it's part of why even now his season SV% is worse than Schneider's.
 

JimEIV

Registered User
Feb 19, 2003
66,192
28,542
Having two games in December where Kinkaid stopped fewer than 6 out of 7 shots tanked his SV% and it's part of why even now his season SV% is worse than Schneider's.
He got hurt in one of those games and had to leave early.
 

NJDevs26

Once upon a time...
Mar 21, 2007
67,422
31,750
Having two games in December where Kinkaid stopped fewer than 6 out of 7 shots tanked his SV% and it's part of why even now his season SV% is worse than Schneider's.

He had a lot more than two bad games before February. Twelve of his first nineteen starts he had below a .890 save percentage including four in a row in February and fourteen of those games he gave up 3+ goals before this latest ten-game surge where he's been a quality goalie. It has been a tale of two seasons for Keith, let's not pass it off as just a couple of bad games skewing the numbers early.
 

JimEIV

Registered User
Feb 19, 2003
66,192
28,542
He had a lot more than two bad games before February. Twelve of his first nineteen starts he had below a .890 save percentage including four in a row in February and fourteen of those games he gave up 3+ goals before this latest ten-game surge where he's been a quality goalie. It has been a tale of two seasons for Keith, let's not pass it off as just a couple of bad games skewing the numbers early.

This is not right. At least not according to hockey references game logs.

He was under a .900 10 of his first 20 games.

In his first 20 games he was 10-7-2 with a .892 Save % .


It is also important to note that 20 of Keith's games takes us all the way to February 10th. So if it is a tale of two Keith's the story is more about starts...hes been winning the entire time though.
 

Spoiled Bratt

Registered User
Jun 29, 2016
4,819
2,111
I think jim is just mad that vat’s pushed severson down to second pairing

Without the acquisition of Vatanen, this team wouldn't be fighting for a playoff spot cause we'd have Severson playing top minutes and that wouldn't be good for anyone.
 

JimEIV

Registered User
Feb 19, 2003
66,192
28,542
Yikes! I can see the more fullness in his face. He was listed at 210 just a few years ago. I didn't realize he was 185 until someone posted it on here and said the strength and conditioning coach should be fired for not having him build some muscle haha. I actually thought it was a mistake, but here we are a couple years later and he's listed at 185.

I really wonder why he would lose 20-25 pounds around 30 years old, when he wasn't really that big to begin with? The only thing that I can think of is to get quicker.
I would say that is a direct response to coaches wanting faster. That's probably a bigger comment on Zajac's commitment and professionalism to do what it takes to meet the requirements of the NHL.
 

SteveCangialosi123

Registered User
Feb 17, 2012
28,145
48,507
NJ
Without the acquisition of Vatanen, this team wouldn't be fighting for a playoff spot cause we'd have Severson playing top minutes and that wouldn't be good for anyone.
You’re aware that Andy Greene plays top pairing minutes on this team, right? Severson hasn’t been close to a liability this season. He has been one of our best players.
 

NJDevs26

Once upon a time...
Mar 21, 2007
67,422
31,750
This is not right. At least not according to hockey references game logs.

He was under a .900 10 of his first 20 games.


12017-10-14128-102NJD@NYRWW23129.9350060:00
22017-10-19228-107NJD@OTTWW0991.0000021:19
32017-10-20328-108NJDSJSLL33330.9090059:46
42017-10-27428-115NJDOTTWW42723.8520065:00
52017-11-05528-124NJD@CGYL-SOO43430.8820065:00
62017-11-12628-131NJD@CHIWW54439.8860060:00
72017-11-18728-137NJD@WPGL012121.0000020:00
82017-11-25828-144NJD@DETWW33431.9120062:32
92017-12-02928-151NJD@ARILL52722.8150060:00
102017-12-091028-158NJD@NYRLL53934.8720060:00
112018-01-021128-182NJD@STLL-SOO22927.9310065:00
122018-01-161228-196NJD@NYIWW12625.9620060:00
132018-01-181328-198NJDWSHWW31916.8420060:27
142018-01-201428-200NJD@PHILL374.5710012:15
152018-01-301528-210NJD@BUFWW12827.9640060:00
162018-02-011628-212NJDPHIWW32522.8800060:00
172018-02-031728-214NJDPITWW11615.9380060:00
182018-02-061828-217NJD@OTTLL42016.8000028:40
192018-02-081928-219NJDCGYLL32522.8800058:47
202018-02-102028-221NJD@CBJLL65044.8800060:00
RkDateGAgeTmOppDECGASASVSV%SOPIMTOI
212018-02-132128-224NJD@PHIWW43531.8860064:52
[TBODY] [/TBODY]
That's 12 out of 19 starts below an .890 from Hockey Reference...the Ottawa win and Winnipeg appearance were relief efforts. The 1/20 Flyer game was the early hook.
 

JimEIV

Registered User
Feb 19, 2003
66,192
28,542
Without the acquisition of Vatanen, this team wouldn't be fighting for a playoff spot cause we'd have Severson playing top minutes and that wouldn't be good for anyone.
Severson wasn't in that spot before Vatanen got here....

Their best stretch of the year in terms of wins/losses has been with Santini on the top pair.
 

Spoiled Bratt

Registered User
Jun 29, 2016
4,819
2,111
You’re aware that Andy Greene plays top pairing minutes on this team, right? Severson hasn’t been close to a liability this season. He has been one of our best players.

Yeah, I'm aware that Greene can't handle top line minutes anymore and it's a blessing that we were able to find someone that would help him out on the right side because having Greene AND Severson/Santini on our top line would've sunk us, HARD.

Again, your love for a guy that is either good or below mediocre is astonishing. Potential is one thing but to say that he's been one of best players is just laughable. The guy has as many deflected goals in his own net then assists!

He's been playing like a #4 cause that's what he is ATM.
 

JimEIV

Registered User
Feb 19, 2003
66,192
28,542
Yeah, I'm aware that Greene can't handle top line minutes anymore and it's a blessing that we were able to find someone that would help him out on the right side because having Greene AND Severson/Santini on our top line would've sunk us, HARD.

Again, your love for a guy that is either good or below mediocre is astonishing. Potential is one thing but to say that he's been one of best players is just laughable. The guy has as many deflected goals in his own net then assists!

He's been playing like a #4 cause that's what he is ATM.
Again, Severson wasn't used there before Vatanen got here so what are you talking about.
 

Spoiled Bratt

Registered User
Jun 29, 2016
4,819
2,111
Again, Severson wasn't used there before Vatanen got here so what are you talking about.

I'm saying that as the season moves forward, games are becoming tighter and having a Greene/Severson 1st pairing would've sunk us because Greene is a liability and Severson is lost more often then not in his own zone.

How hard is that to understand?

Edit: I'm just happy we were able to get a legit #2 in Vatanen because he's playing real well and I'd say he's been our 2nd best player after Hall in the last month+. Take away his first 10 games and he's on pace for 56 pts since!
 

NJDevs26

Once upon a time...
Mar 21, 2007
67,422
31,750
Severson never being used there should also tell you something when they put a rookie Santini in that spot over him, and then after he fell down the elevator shaft to the AHL it was Vatanen. But if we didn't trade for Vatanen it would have eventually been Severson or (gak) Lovejoy back on the top pairing.
 

SteveCangialosi123

Registered User
Feb 17, 2012
28,145
48,507
NJ
Yeah, I'm aware that Greene can't handle top line minutes anymore and it's a blessing that we were able to find someone that would help him out on the right side because having Greene AND Severson/Santini on our top line would've sunk us, HARD.

Again, your love for a guy that is either good or below mediocre is astonishing. Potential is one thing but to say that he's been one of best players is just laughable. The guy has as many deflected goals in his own net then assists!

He's been playing like a #4 cause that's what he is ATM.
You really don’t really know what you’re talking about at all. It’s hilarous. Severson has been very good all year and hasn’t deserved much criticism at all outside a couple bad games which is completely understandable for a 23 year old. On the list of reasons why our team isn’t great, he’s towards the very very bottom. He’s an excellent player now and will only get better, sorry you’re stuck in some alternate reality where the 23 year old is an issue on this team.
 

NjDevsRR

Anything Can Happen In Jersey
Apr 24, 2012
28,703
57,258
Belmar
He was under a .900 10 of his first 20 games.

In his first 20 games he was 10-7-2 with a .892 Save % ..
Dude, you just showed how f***ing terrible Keith was in his first half, wins be damned those are laughable numbers for an NHL goalie and you are telling people about false narratives...

892 save percentage ta loco 892....

410A4F96-1E43-41B6-833D-572DB71A4C36.jpeg
 

SteveCangialosi123

Registered User
Feb 17, 2012
28,145
48,507
NJ
Severson never being used there should also tell you something when they put a rookie Santini in that spot over him, and then after he fell down the elevator shaft to the AHL it was Vatanen.
It tells me that he’s best deployed in a role where he can drive offense. Being next to Moore or Butcher makes more sense. People will harp about his mediocre production, but that isn’t how you judge a defenseman creates offense. But even using those stats, Severson has 9 goals and 9 assists at even strength, Vatanen has 3 goals and 13 assists at even strength.
 

Spoiled Bratt

Registered User
Jun 29, 2016
4,819
2,111
You really don’t really know what you’re talking about at all. It’s hilarous. Severson has been very good all year and hasn’t deserved much criticism at all outside a couple bad games which is completely understandable for a 23 year old. On the list of reasons why our team isn’t great, he’s towards the very very bottom. He’s an excellent player now and will only get better, sorry you’re stuck in some alternate reality where the 23 year old is an issue on this team.

Lol... relax their buddy.

I've said this a million times, the kid has upside but to call him one of our best players all year is dodging reality because he hasn't. Playing in his own zone is pretty important for a blueliner and he hasn't grasped that part yet but it'll come with time and as for his offence, he's been average as well.

Scoring 10 goals is great but for someone who's being tagged with a great first pass, 10 assists is a joke.

I'll say it again so it makes you feel comfortable, he has upside but he has a lot of issues to fix before calling him "one of our best players".
 

RSeen

Registered User
Oct 26, 2011
6,658
1,976
Toronto
Who has been better than Severson other than Vatenen? Greene's performance hasn't been great and part of that is absolutely that he is playing too tough competition but I really do not see an argument for anyone including him.
 

NJDevs26

Once upon a time...
Mar 21, 2007
67,422
31,750
Who has been better than Severson other than Vatenen? Greene's performance hasn't been great and part of that is absolutely that he is playing too tough competition but I really do not see an argument for anyone including him.

lol that's a fair point and part of why I don't really buy the narrative on the D being above average in general. Certainly improved from last season adding Vat (plus Butcher who's been fine on the back pairing at least) but definitely a long way to go still when you have one recent add who looks like a top pairing guy and a huge dropoff after. Maybe the first 20-30 games I'd have said Moore would be above Sevs but he's fallen off again.
 

SteveCangialosi123

Registered User
Feb 17, 2012
28,145
48,507
NJ
Lol... relax their buddy.

I've said this a million times, the kid has upside but to call him one of our best players all year is dodging reality because he hasn't. Playing in his own zone is pretty important for a blueliner and he hasn't grasped that part yet but it'll come with time and as for his offence, he's been average as well.

Scoring 10 goals is great but for someone who's being tagged with a great first pass, 10 assists is a joke.

I'll say it again so it makes you feel comfortable, he has upside but he has a lot of issues to fix before calling him "one of our best players".
There is no statistical argument that he hasn’t been good, we’ve already been over this.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad