Der Jaeger
Generational EBUG
Reinhart won't return Werenski.
Murray won't return Reinhart.
I don't see the teams as good trading partners.
Murray won't return Reinhart.
I don't see the teams as good trading partners.
Im not scrolling back thru 11 pages, so forgive me if this has already come up...
Would something around Reinhart for Murray/Werenski interest CBJ at all? Sabres need a young top-4 d-man badly and are already pretty set up the middle w/ Eichel/O'Reilly/Girgensons/Larsson/Rodrigues... thoughts?
What are you even talking about? Do you even know who Eichel is? You sound uneducated when you post stuff like this.
Well we are not listening on an offer for Reinhart based on Ryan Murray so as I said, look for your "top 6 C" from the op elsewhere then. Don't expect to get Werenski in real life but some people thinking they can get Reinhart with Murray is a bit insulting.
Your GM is the one on the record saying the roster still needs a trade to fill holes.. far from the CBJ HF board fan perspective of 'it's just a want not a need and we don't want to move any real pieces to make it happen'.
Would you take Milano instead of Bjorkstrand?
I'll try one more since I beleave we have pieces that both needs.
Duchene
For
Murray
Bjorkstrand
2018 2nd pick
CBJ gets 1C and avs get their top4 dman and 2 line winger in the future.
That is how much YOU value him, you have 0 clue what your GM will do
I remember McKenzie said he was aiming at Hanifin with this trade attempt?Jarmo nearly traded up to #3 overall to pick Werenski, but decided against it because he figured other GMs would overlook him, and he was right.
Nylander for Seth Jones.
I remember McKenzie said he was aiming at Hanifin with this trade attempt?
Adding Bjorkstrand to Murray would get us someone more proven and a guaranteed asset going forward then Reinhart is right now.As a Sabres 1st CBJ 2nd fan (don't ask) I don't see why Reinhart for Murray + or ++ is completely out of the equation (like anything regarding Werenski is)
The add from CBJ would have to be really nice, and it cant be just futures like a high prospect or a 1st rd pick, has to be something to help the Sabres win now, but also at the same time be a valuable and cost friendly piece for the future.
Bjorkstrand?
Adding Bjorkstrand to Murray would get us someone more proven and a guaranteed asset going forward then Reinhart is right now.
I'm saying Murray and Bjorkstrand is more valuable then Reinhart.I don't understand what you're saying, but I hope its not Bjorkstrand is a more valuable asset than Reinhart
Nylander for Seth Jones.
Nylander for Seth Jones.
As a Sabres 1st CBJ 2nd fan (don't ask) I don't see why Reinhart for Murray + or ++ is completely out of the equation (like anything regarding Werenski is)
The add from CBJ would have to be really nice, and it cant be just futures like a high prospect or a 1st rd pick, has to be something to help the Sabres win now, but also at the same time be a valuable and cost friendly piece for the future.
Bjorkstrand?
Jones is in the same sort of "seriously, just don't ask, it'll be better for all of us" territory as Matthews. Nylander's definitely very interesting, and I don't doubt it'd take someone of similar value to land him if we were targeting him, but frankly it's more reasonable for us to just keep Jones.
* * *
Does Jenner qualify? That's who I'd suggested earlier.
Sounds like it's NYR or Columbus for Kovalchuk.
Yup since when does Kovalchuk get to decide where he plays his options right now are Devils whoever the Devils deal him to or the KHL . Pick your poison KovalchukYeah that spam accout is not to be trusted...and his sources are probably posts on hfboards or sb nation.