bernmeister
Registered User
Not saying it's a 1 for 1... I think Strome and cap going back to Chicago would even it up
NYR not a fit for Hawks' best pieces.
Not saying it's a 1 for 1... I think Strome and cap going back to Chicago would even it up
Start with Byram. Then start adding.
That being said, none of Toews/Kane/Keith are going anywhere unless they want to.
Keith is the only one that I'm very sure would want to leave.
His comments on Spittin' Chiclets. Dude seems to hate losing with a passion.Based on?
Keith is 37 and has a $5.5m caphit for 3 more years. Is he playing at a level anywhere close to be worth that caphit?Colorado made Chicago's life really easy for a couple of years there. In return, we request you trade us Duncan Keith to help mentor Byram and Makar. I don't think it's a big ask.
No....he's still a #2 with the right partner and a #3 at worst. Keith is probably never going to be worse than a 2nd pairing defender for the remainder of his career.Keith is 37 and has a $5.5m caphit for 3 more years. Is he playing at a level anywhere close to be worth that caphit?
Would Chicago be open to trading Keith at 50% retained. At $2.75m it would be far more palatable to have him declining in a 3rd pairing/7D role.
Where did NYR come in to this Bern? I was talking about Chicago and FloridaNYR not a fit for Hawks' best pieces.
Where did NYR come in to this Bern? I was talking about Chicago and Florida
I was suggesting a package of Strome and Keith for Knight and someone elsemay have confiused Stromes.
sorry
Let me tell you about a little place called CarolinaHonestly the only contender that has the prospect capital to make a Kane trade work is Colorado.
Keith is 37 and has a $5.5m caphit for 3 more years. Is he playing at a level anywhere close to be worth that caphit?
Would Chicago be open to trading Keith at 50% retained. At $2.75m it would be far more palatable to have him declining in a 3rd pairing/7D role.
I don't put much stock in that. Unless you can show me all the interviews of players who seem fine with losing.His comments on Spittin' Chiclets. Dude seems to hate losing with a passion.
Keith is 37 and has a $5.5m caphit for 3 more years. Is he playing at a level anywhere close to be worth that caphit?
Would Chicago be open to trading Keith at 50% retained. At $2.75m it would be far more palatable to have him declining in a 3rd pairing/7D role.
Let me tell you about a little place called Carolina
You retain to get a better return.Yes, Keith played very well last season.
No reason to retain. He's worth every penny of $5.5M
Not a chance they would retain 50% on Kane
Wouldn't it make more sense for Chicago to retain though to maximise the futures return given that they're rebuilding?Yes, Keith played very well last season.
No reason to retain. He's worth every penny of $5.5M
2/19/88 aren't going anywhere unless they ask to, which I don't think will happen. Pointless to discuss.
Why wouldn't Keith want to waive to get to play on the top pairing with Makar on a powerhouse team to finish off his career?Ah good call. Would he waive to go there though?
I could absolutely see him waiving for Colorado.
Why wouldn't Keith want to waive to get to play on the top pairing with Makar on a powerhouse team to finish off his career?
Keith ------------- Makar
Girard ----------- Johnson
Graves/Byram -- Timmins
Cole
Fine , take Cole. At least you shorten the hit VS Keith.Ah good call. Would he waive to go there though?
I could absolutely see him waiving for Colorado.
I don't think he said fire sale, either. I've seen various different ideas on your board mostly involving Toews. It's just those salaries. In normal times, ANY team would fall all over themselves to figure something out.I watched Bowmans' comments on Crawford and understand he stated the notion of going forward with Delia Lankinen and that's the route their leaning towards, but when did Bowman say it's a youth movement and that the fire sale is on? He didn't, so why is everyone assuming so?
I watched Bowmans' comments on Crawford and understand he stated the notion of going forward with Delia Lankinen and that's the route their leaning towards, but when did Bowman say it's a youth movement and that the fire sale is on? He didn't, so why is everyone assuming so?