TheImpatientPanther
Registered User
Maybe Flames fans meant he'd get 100 pts in 2 combined years?
At this point that would be an improvement...Maybe Flames fans meant he'd get 100 pts in 2 combined years?
He enjoyed non playoff hockey in FloridaMaybe Flames fans meant he'd get 100 pts in 2 combined years?
Huberdeau didnt forget how to play hockey in a few months hes still an elite winger i dont follow the flames but maybe its just the style they play under Sutter
What's the damage if they buyout that contract right now? This is a scary situation.
Good argument for analytics not having much relevance.
Analytics actually always showed that AA is bad defensively.Fancy stats are much more tailored to something like baseball which is incredibly episodic in its events. Each at-bat (even each pitch) and ball put into play are unique data points that have a clearly driven start and stop. Something like hockey... a poorly timed shift change would result in no ding to a guy's fancy stats, but could potentially be damning to everyone else on the ice.
Most analytical hockey stats have a point solely in large data points where you eventually will get a material amount of similar situations where you can gauge what an individual's impact is. But honestly, it requires a lot of data to have any relevance.
Most of the people who quote these analytical stats don't understand slightly what they're saying and therefore take absurd conclusions from the data and extrapolate them. A guy on the Wings board was absolutely notorious for doing this with Andreas Athanasiou... like if we just gave him 20 minutes a night, he'd keep up his high scoring rate and my god, we're just misusing him!
You make the very point you're trying to refute with this data. If he was so good and so misused... Why are Edmonton, LA, and Chicago all misusing him? I mean, he's getting 16:07 again and playing with players on the same level as he had in 18-19 (because he was on the second line with guys like Nielsen and not the big gun line with Larkin or Bertuzzi or Mantha... except for the PP, which he didn't score much on that year)
He's a good, one-dimensional player who kind of has a hard cap on his ability because he never developed any tool beyond that one skill. He caps at around that TOI because he hurts you defenisvely even as he helps you offensively. That is precisely the point. Analytics tell you one thing and the eye test/hockey logic tell you another.
Weegar looks just fine to me but ya some more points would be alright from him.Weegar underachieved also. Sounds like it is Calgary.
He had his best seasons under Q, except one, though. And the Panthers at least looked the best in the playoffs under Q but fell to eventual champs Tampa Bay. Not so sure I buy that Sutter is a better coach than Q. Last season Brunette continued Q’s systems but couldn’t make the necessary adjustments.He enjoyed non playoff hockey in Florida
Sutter doesn’t do that stuff
Not saying who is the better coach.He had his best seasons under Q, except one, though. And the Panthers at least looked the best in the playoffs under Q but fell to eventual champs Tampa Bay. Not so sure I buy that Sutter is a better coach than Q. Last season Brunette continued Q’s systems but couldn’t make the necessary adjustments.
I do find it interesting that Johnny Hockey could flourish under Sutter where Huby has struggled, but maybe that had more to do with Tkachuk being there.
Was more commenting on the playoff type style.Not saying who is the better coach.
Gaudreau had success without Tkachuk also. They were together for only one year. Yes, he needs competent line mates to succeed. They all do.
I don’t know what Huberdeau’s problem is but he looks terrible now. The only assumption in Calgary is it doesn’t fit Sutter’s system but that’s a guess.
I am not concerned about Huberdeau. An 'off' season for him so far. Should the team make the play-offs players that have had a poor season have been known to excel.
I think too many fans set expectations that can prove unreasonable as they undervalue the effects of a fist trade may have on a player. They can become rudderless and it takes time to re-establish their life in every respect.
Factor in new conference, new division, new coach, new systems, and maybe your production drops off. Then you get down on yourself to perform to the level your salary warrants.