Confirmed Trade: [CBJ/VAN] Vanek for Jussi Jokinen, Tyler Motte

ScottishCanuck

Registered User
May 9, 2010
3,035
1,889
Scotland
Because Benning is a joke of a GM
Points In Last 2 Seasons:

Thomas Vanek: 89
Evander Kane: 83
Matt Duchene: 80
Derrick Brassard: 77
Gustav Nyqvist: 77
Tomas Tatar: 73
Patrick Maroon: 72
Michael Grabner: 71
Rick Nash: 66
Tomas Pekanec: 52

It's almost like a player's trade value is dictated by factors other than just points!

Shocking.
 

Monk

Registered User
Feb 5, 2008
7,515
5,411
Where did Jokinen's name come up in this? It seems pretty clear to me he's speaking of Brendan Leipsic and Tyler Motte no?

That's just the quote I saw about getting faster. So that's my point, no mention of Jokinen.
 

CherryToke

Registered User
Oct 18, 2008
26,735
8,218
Coquitlam
While I understand feeling that the return is underwhelming but Motte is functionally a 3rd/4th round pick.

He's reasonably young, an established bottom-6 guy who while smaller can skate and should contribute secondary offense. Has upside. I'd take him over the likely bust that a late 3rd round pick presents.

Nope. He's a 2013 4th round pick that has yet to produce even at the AHL level and is a RFA at the end of next season. AKA waiver fodder.
 

mikeyp24

Registered User
Jun 28, 2014
5,959
1,231
Again I meant there was no one else looking. Motte is basically a nothing prospect. A 5th could have landed Vanek.
Motte actually played ok in his games here but wasn't playing the style Torts really wanted and we were the youngest team in the league. With our 3 new guys I doubt we are the youngest anymore though. All over 30.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LickTheEnvelope

Alberta_OReilly_Fan

Bruin fan since 1975
Nov 26, 2006
14,331
3,941
Edmonton Canada
Vanek is better than Nash...great pickup by Cbus.

Nash has question marks imho and im not sure hes a guy i support but vanek has absolutely no question marks and even for this return still sucks

I would hate to waste a playoff roster space on him.

Very very very glad my team isnt the one that landed this prize... good luck columbus, dont wish you ill... but im way happier with nash and im not a nash fan at all
 

Monk

Registered User
Feb 5, 2008
7,515
5,411
Nash has question marks imho and im not sure hes a guy i support but vanek has absolutely no question marks and even for this return still sucks

I would hate to waste a playoff roster space on him.

Very very very glad my team isnt the one that landed this prize... good luck columbus, dont wish you ill... but im way happier with nash and im not a nash fan at all

I AM a Nash fan, and considering the prices paid today I'd rather have Vanek. To each their own.
 

Guy Gadowsky

Registered User
May 10, 2017
230
88
I watched a whole bunch of Tyler Motte Michigan games and god did he ever suck when not leeching off Kyle Connor's jock
 

Lotusflower

Tha Snake, Tha Rat, Tha Cat, Tha Dog
Dec 23, 2013
4,448
4,662
i.png

giphy.gif
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad