I am somewhat on your side and enjoy your post, but over the past 4 years Price has been in the running for best in the league. Key is in the running. No problem with including guys like Rask/Holtby/Dubnyk/Bob in there as well.
If Price was making his salary he has now it wouldn't be an issue. The problem is its stupid to pay any goalie that amount, especially one that has never won a game in the 3rd round in the NHL. Teams are not investing in goalies and the last decade of cup winners have shown you don't need a high priced goalie to win a cup.
I only think Price is overrated in the sense that he has been put on such a pedestal that its like no one else is close to him. Even Crosby has a debate about Ovechkin or Malkin being better than him, but with Price no other goalie can match him and they all play on super amazing teams that are the best but Price does it all by himself. Goalie talent is so saturated that there isn't a lot of difference between the 1st starter and the 15th and even the 1st and 30th.
A guy like Dubnyk can't crack it as an AHL goalie for us, and then all of a sudden he is putting up almost Vezna season. Bob wins a Vezna, stinks and then wins a 2nd. Price is superhuman, and this year he is the worst goalie in the league. Maybe its because so much of the game is out of the goalies control and there are so many outside variables that effect the goalie.
I appreciate people who read my post whether they like em or not is up to them I dont mind either way
Maybe getting an average goalie at 4-5M +rookie 2-3M backup might be safer
get one of the goalies in a hot streak in the playoffs...then switch if he fails...I dont know
According to votes
2007-2016
Price Vezina trophy pts and others during that span
Brodeur 113+32
Nabokov 106+20+9
Lund 13+14+23+120+55+5+6=236
Bob 110+1+138=249
Lehtonen 1
Giguere 11
Kipp 7+3+2+1
Backstrom 6+31+1
Lu 5+30+6+1+33+14
Huet 4
Price 2+10+1+26+144+19=202
Thomas 2+127+104=233
Osgood 1
Mason 33+3
Ward 11+4
Vokoun 1
Miller 126
Bryz 79+9
Anderson 9+22
Rask 3+12+103
Varlamov 90
Bishop 32+51
Howard 2+9
Emery 6
Crawford 5+3+10
Schneider 10
Gibson 3
Hammond 1
Hiller 3
Halak 1+3
Rine 84+42+60
Dubnyk 28+8
Feury 1+1
Quick 1+63+9+1+36
Talbot 1+17
Niemi 1+46
Smith 35
Elliott 5+3
Jones 3+1
Holtby 26+140+87=253
The supposed experts dont seem to find Price the best compared to his peers, both bob and holt get more pts than price for less career years and lund more point over that span, thomas in a short span more pts, in the regular season were price is supposed to be the best
not including this year, only voted one point+ in 6/10 years...144pts 2014...58pts in 9years...
Looking at the legends of modern era vezinas first ten years compared to prices 202pts/10years
They all played at the same time for a couple years in their first 10years brodeur never won during haseks first ten years while play played but he still managed to get 247pts in 9 years and win the vezina the next year at 131pts, price has 58pts in 9 years and a vezina at 144pts
Brodeur 5+7+31+73+57+17+8+42+7+131=378
1993-2002
Roy 1+2+8+87+91+44+95+3+34=365
1985-1994
Hasek
99-104-9-120-126-73-4-85=620
1991-2000
Not even close...
Maybe top 3 in the last four excluding the playoffs and this years...does top 3 deserve 10.5M over 8 years with no playoffs success... thats a huge risk for a franchise to take