rafalesque
Registered User
- Apr 9, 2017
- 210
- 39
It's the contract.
Sure, Trade him now for some offence and defence. it will be worth the money spent
It's the contract.
It's the contract.
i agree 100%
i said in another thread if Lindgren starts playing too well, and wins too many games, he will be sent back down, they down want anybody challenging the almighty Price, no matter how bad he plays
He earned that contract by being one of the top players in the league for a number of years. Just like how Subban earned his contract.
I understand where you're coming from, but to me it's just silly. You'd think some people would be happier with a bunch of middling players affordable contracts instead of stars, because stars are more expensive...
At 9 mils a year for Subban its a steal.
Price needs some time thats all
A lot of people have seen the teams that have won champions though and understand that you don't need to pay a goalie $10.5m for 8 years when he's going to be 31 when the contract kicks in to win. We couldn't even win with him at $6.5m (that's on Bergevin) but still.He earned that contract by being one of the top players in the league for a number of years. Just like how Subban earned his contract.
I understand where you're coming from, but to me it's just silly. You'd think some people would be happier with a bunch of middling players affordable contracts instead of stars, because stars are more expensive...
He was with the team all this time... This is after the Chicago win.
Definitely not a steal... It was market value, ergo "fair". Again, nothing wrong with that, especially given how bad the organization screwed him over on the bridge contract. He earned that 9M contract.
A steal would be Hedman signing long term at 7.875M.
Definitely not a steal... It was market value, ergo "fair". Again, nothing wrong with that, especially given how bad the organization screwed him over on the bridge contract. He earned that 9M contract.
A steal would be Hedman signing long term at 7.875M.
A lot of people have seen the teams that have won champions though and understand that you don't need to pay a goalie $10.5m for 8 years when he's going to be 31 when the contract kicks in to win. We couldn't even win with him at $6.5m (that's on Bergevin) but still.
We're good enough in the pipelines with Lindgren especially that I'm not surprised people hate the deal and are turning on Carey. I'm not completely one of those people yet, but I'm not against using a compliance buyout on Carey in 3-4 years after the lockout to get out of the deal if we can retain Lindgren until then and he continues to progress as he has. Carey Price isn't going to get better as the contract carries on and he gets older. If he signed it as a 25-26 year old, that's a different story.
I don't even care about the cap hit, but its the length and age when it starts. Price is going to be great for another 4/5 years and I think at that cap hit the max length should have been 5-6 years, or a lesser cap hit for 8 years. He took Bergie to the cleaners on that one.He earned that contract by being one of the top players in the league for a number of years. Just like how Subban earned his contract.
I understand where you're coming from, but to me it's just silly. You'd think some people would be happier with a bunch of middling players affordable contracts instead of stars, because stars are more expensive...
He’s obviously not talking about right now.
big contracts can make a player lazy.....nothing to prove anymore,
and big goalie contracts rarely ever pay off or win anything....luquist, rask, dipietro, etc etc,
Price contract will be no different,
5-6 years ago a friend of mine (not a habs fan) said to me that the habs will never win a cup with Price.....back then i laughed at him, but now i think he was right
True enough...difference between Price and a Lindgren isn't 10 million dollars. Goalies aren't as important as they were during trap era. Since '04 rule changes best goalie in game Price, Luongo, Lundqvist, Miller none have won a Cup. While Osgood, Neimi, Fleury have. Prove is in the puddingA lot of people have seen the teams that have won champions though and understand that you don't need to pay a goalie $10.5m for 8 years when he's going to be 31 when the contract kicks in to win. We couldn't even win with him at $6.5m (that's on Bergevin) but still.
We're good enough in the pipelines with Lindgren especially that I'm not surprised people hate the deal and are turning on Carey. I'm not completely one of those people yet, but I'm not against using a compliance buyout on Carey in 3-4 years after the lockout to get out of the deal if we can retain Lindgren until then and he continues to progress as he has. Carey Price isn't going to get better as the contract carries on and he gets older. If he signed it as a 25-26 year old, that's a different story.
A lot of people have seen the teams that have won champions though and understand that you don't need to pay a goalie $10.5m for 8 years when he's going to be 31 when the contract kicks in to win. We couldn't even win with him at $6.5m (that's on Bergevin) but still.
We're good enough in the pipelines with Lindgren especially that I'm not surprised people hate the deal and are turning on Carey. I'm not completely one of those people yet, but I'm not against using a compliance buyout on Carey in 3-4 years after the lockout to get out of the deal if we can retain Lindgren until then and he continues to progress as he has. Carey Price isn't going to get better as the contract carries on and he gets older. If he signed it as a 25-26 year old, that's a different story.
At 9 mils a year for Subban its a steal.
Price needs some time thats all
9M for Subban is a disaster.
not surprised either, we could already see it at the end last season when idiots were blaming him for the PO while he was giving less than 2 a game...
but, considering how bad Bergevin is at building a strong team both offensively and defensively, paying top dollar for a goalie is the only option...
This doesn't make any sense at all. Goalies can't bail out 21 players in today's NHL. They can't trap it like they did for Roy or how Brodeur would get 16 shots a game. Today, if you find yourself in a situation where your goalie is saving the rest in short periods, trade him, and fix the rest! You will never win a cup playing the goalie game today. It's a center man game + offensive D, right now. If you don't have those pieces you have no real shot.
This doesn't make any sense at all. Goalies can't bail out 21 players in today's NHL. They can't trap it like they did for Roy or how Brodeur would get 16 shots a game. Today, if you find yourself in a situation where your goalie is saving the rest in short periods, trade him, and fix the rest! You will never win a cup playing the goalie game today. It's a center man game + offensive D, right now. If you don't have those pieces you have no real shot.