firstemperor
Registered User
- May 25, 2011
- 8,755
- 1,445
But not at the expense of Nylander. I'm talking a package to acquire a top 10 d-man.
You don't trade 1Cs for 2Ds
2 of them sure are in the right deal. If it makes the team better I’m sure management would be all over it.No thanks. The core 3 aren't available for trade.
Nylander is already a proven 1C where Slavin is barely an NHL player apparently
Dermott's pacing for 28 points now, with bottom pairing minutes and no PP time. he's looking like he can be a lot more than a 30 point defensemanAnyone that has a clue about anything understands that the Leafs will not have a problem signing Marner, Nylander and Matthews.
Dermott is looking like he can round out into a 30 point defenceman and hes two years younger than Slavin.
No thank you.
With another year missing the playoffs and a new GM, the Canes might be prepared for a Jones/Johansen or Larsson/Hall type trade.
Toronto is not going to be able to pay Matthews/Marner/Nylander (especially since Marleau is on the payroll through 2020).
So Slavin for Nylander.
As a Canes' fan, I want/expect Slavin to be part of the core. But two things are reality: 1) The Canes need more offense, including from the D and Slavin might have a 40 point ceiling (whereas Hanifin and Bean might be 50-55). 2) Like the trades mentioned above, you have to give up something to get something.
Have at it!!
Projecting that way but still early days, what did you think of him Saturday?Nylander is a 1C?
Projecting that way but still early days, what did you think of him Saturday?
I agree.Dermott's pacing for 28 points now, with bottom pairing minutes and no PP time. he's looking like he can be a lot more than a 30 point defenseman
Nobody is trading you that quality of d-man for a package. Expect to hear "Matthews, Marner, Nylander or **** off." a lot.
This is a joke. Nylander isn't even a 1C which is what the Canes need. Nylander for Skinner. Larsson returned a Hall. Nylander is nowhere near a Hall and Slavin is like a Larsson if not better. Toronto needs to add for this to be fair. Nylander the glorious 1C has yet to out up 30 goal season and Skinner did in his first year and in a very bad team. That's a fair trade.
The Pens didn't play their best on Saturday, and I haven't watched any other games with him at C.
I still think of him as a player with tremendous vision, and who's best suited as a winger.
This is a joke. Nylander isn't even a 1C which is what the Canes need. Nylander for Skinner. Larsson returned a Hall. Nylander is nowhere near a Hall and Slavin is like a Larsson if not better. Toronto needs to add for this to be fair. Nylander the glorious 1C has yet to out up 30 goal season and Skinner did in his first year and in a very bad team. That's a fair trade.
oh no, Leafs might not be able to make our version of Hall for Larsson? well shoot, if you say soThis is a joke. Nylander isn't even a 1C which is what the Canes need. Nylander for Skinner. Larsson returned a Hall. Nylander is nowhere near a Hall and Slavin is like a Larsson if not better. Toronto needs to add for this to be fair. Nylander the glorious 1C has yet to out up 30 goal season and Skinner did in his first year and in a very bad team. That's a fair trade.
So what has Slavin proven? He can lead a bad team in TOI?
he looks a lot better at center, and it's what he's played most of his careerThe Pens didn't play their best on Saturday, and I haven't watched any other games with him at C.
I still think of him as a player with tremendous vision, and who's best suited as a winger.
With another year missing the playoffs and a new GM, the Canes might be prepared for a Jones/Johansen or Larsson/Hall type trade.
Toronto is not going to be able to pay Matthews/Marner/Nylander (especially since Marleau is on the payroll through 2020).
So Slavin for Nylander.
As a Canes' fan, I want/expect Slavin to be part of the core. But two things are reality: 1) The Canes need more offense, including from the D and Slavin might have a 40 point ceiling (whereas Hanifin and Bean might be 50-55). 2) Like the trades mentioned above, you have to give up something to get something.
Have at it!!