You sir are all over the map..so if it was Boeser instead of Gudbranson in the exact same scenario it would be ok because why? Cause "hes a good player"? What the hell is the difference?! You can be pissed that they signed him but being more pissed because he was injured at that time is a true Canucks HFBoards overreaction.
So what would you do oh smart one...you would just let him walk? What if, oh I don't know, they trade him?
The fact that Boeser is a significant better asset doesn’t play a role in whether he should get a contract extension or not?
And absolutely if a guy like Tanev had a serious shoulder injury that required surgery the team should do its due dillegence.
It’s not an overreaction at all, if you actually critically analyze the fact that Gudbranson’s body clearly isn’t holding up, what warrants giving him a multi year deal? This isn’t EA sports injury history absolutely hinders a players ability to future play the sport.
If a bad hockey player who’s always injured has an injury where a massive surgery is needed it’s absolutely insane to sign him to a multi year contract without do your rightful due dillegence.