Iapyi
Registered User
You are lucky. Most strawmen perished in the recent cold wave, so many HFBoards posters are stuck arguing against actual claims.
Yeah that cross check to the head/face wasn't obvious.
You are lucky. Most strawmen perished in the recent cold wave, so many HFBoards posters are stuck arguing against actual claims.
You're entire statement was hypocritical and when facts and truth hit you, you completely ignore it. Like when I said History + Intent = longer suspension you completely ignore it and counter with a dumb response that doesn't argue you're point at all.
And the intent is clear with Kadri. Here are more facts and truths for you to ignore:
I think excluding Leaf fans most people would agree it wasn't as bad.You think what Kadri did is worse then this? WOW. oops sorry I forgot that objectivity isn't often used on these boards.
I think excluding Leaf fans most people would agree it wasn't as bad.
see post# 666, if the roles were reversed you would say the exact opposite of what you are saying whereas my stance would be the exact same. Oh well, have fun.
btw - I did not ignore the inane comment about intent but I'm not surprised you ignored it. Yawn.
Alright, since you apparently don't know what a straw man argument is:Yeah that cross check to the head/face wasn't obvious.
I think they actually may be the straw manAlright, since you apparently don't know what a straw man argument is:
You were in the midst of an argument with Jets fans about whether Kadri's or Morrissey's hit was worse. If you weren't arguing against someone who claimed that Morrissey's hit was an acceptable (see: tolerable, fine) hit, your insinuating that someone claimed so only to laugh at that means you're arguing against a claim that wasn't made. This is a straw man argument.
Alright, since you apparently don't know what a straw man argument is:
You were in the midst of an argument with Jets fans about whether Kadri's or Morrissey's hit was worse. If you weren't arguing against someone who claimed that Morrissey's hit was an acceptable (see: tolerable, fine) hit, your insinuating that someone claimed so only to laugh at that means you're arguing against a claim that wasn't made. This is a straw man argument.
*ThanI haven't talked to a fan of any team, other then on these non-objective boards, that doesn't know the cross check to the face was worse. Trying to make it into a team bias is weak.
You haven't provided a single argument as to why this deserves a bigger suspension than Kadri. Not a signal one. When I responded to your comment about intent, you did exactly as I expected and ignored the video evidence provided. You are content with spouting your logical fallacies and hypocrisy so I don't think it's possible to have a reasonable conversation with you. Your commitment is hilarious and entertaining though .
Alright, since you apparently don't know what a straw man argument is:
You were in the midst of an argument with Jets fans about whether Kadri's or Morrissey's hit was worse. If you weren't arguing against someone who claimed that Morrissey's hit was an acceptable (see: tolerable, fine) hit, your insinuating that someone claimed so only to laugh at that means you're arguing against a claim that wasn't made. This is a straw man argument.
LOL. You haven't answered how you know what another person's intent is. Frankly this post is just a bunch of garbage.
I haven't talked to a fan of any team, other then on these non-objective boards, that doesn't know the cross check to the face was worse. Trying to make it into a team bias is weak.
LOL, I was in no argument whatsoever. I took logic in university, I know what a straw man argument is. You sure use a lot of words to say nothing.
Ok look at the number of pages of discussion about the Kadri hit and compare them to this. Clearly more people felt that was worth commenting about that hit than this one.I haven't talked to a fan of any team, other then on these non-objective boards, that doesn't know the cross check to the face was worse. Trying to make it into a team bias is weak.
You took logic in university?LOL, I was in no argument whatsoever. I took logic in university, I know what a straw man argument is. You sure use a lot of words to say nothing.
You took logic in university?
Do tell.
I’m listening.
Heck we’re all listening.
I'm sure you crushed it.