All due respect, you weren't in that office, so its unfair to say he was merely a number puncher or coffee boy.
In addition it's given rise to an insufferable class of armchair sabermaticians and revisionist historians.
All due respect, you weren't in that office, so its unfair to say he was merely a number puncher or coffee boy.
It's a matter of public knowledge. I live in this city and exposed to the media that have been privy to Eagles coverage. You're factually incorrect. He started at the bottom of the front office structure, with zero football background. His way-in was with college degrees and internships and worked his way up until he had the power to allow himself to go on scouting trips. Period.
They didn’t, and I didn’t either. But he’s had multiple 10-win seasons as GM even with Chip.
Wow. They subscribe to a stats service. More picks is good? Who would have thunk?!
Are you saying that Eagles fans that I know and you don't didn't hate Roseman?
Wow. They subscribe to a stats service. More picks is good? Who would have thunk?!
What stat convinced them to pass on Wentz, Watson and roll with Kizer?
They need a service to tell them that a high percentage of sacks out of hurries is a red flag? I thought that was simple math.If that's all you got out of that article, then you're just being stubborn.
Most did, but that was because they didn't trust him, especially after the dream team year. But after he landed Wentz, he's been largely forgiven.
I think people like him now that the team is successful (like any fanbase would) but I heard a lot of comments about wishing he would stick with the business side and let the football guys handle the roster.
They need a service to tell them that a high percentage of sacks out of hurries is a red flag? I thought that was simple math.
There's also the excuse made there where the unnamed coach allegedly threw out the data. Confirming the obvious is brilliance?
The Jags have been touting their analytics department for years (run by the owner's son, another red flag) and have been compiling single digit win seasons in the AFC South until getting Coughlin back on board and they still might need to swap out Bortles.
Here's where I think Brown screwed up and I'm sure any Rand Corporation study will back me up:
It's clear Sachi and Depo thought they would get away with Kizer, there's no way you spend a 2nd on a QB without thinking he is not a starting prospect. They got cute thinking they could rack up picks plug anyone in there and win. Instead they got burnt.
- You are going to have a hard time winning in the NFL without a good QB
- You will have an even harder time winning without at least a servicable QB
- You have better odds finding a good player higher in the draft
- QB is the hardest position to fill
- If you get a good QB they tend to stay a while and let you focus on improving further areas
- There is a reason teams will pay out the nose for a QB
- Since QBs can take a while to develop you are better off taking one sooner than later
They missed on a QB. Maybe. **** happens.
I'm bored of this.
At least four by my count.They missed on a QB. Maybe. **** happens.
I'm bored of this.
So how long until Dorsey gets Brown'd? Hue is 1-27 as HC and yet he not only will survive but will wield significant power within organization on roster
I don't get it
The Browns front 7 is very good. Gregg Williams is a terrible DC and coach.
Then what the hell is he doing there?@Hasbro one of the Browns top beat writers was on the radio yesterday and she specifically said that De Podesta had pretty much no say in any trades/pick/signings/hires etc.
Then what the hell is he doing there?