nobody important
the pessimist returns
i hate the avalanche. i cant say why specifically. maybe its their annoying PA guy. maybe its because they should be in quebec? who knows.
WIN.
I know why I hate them. f***ing filthy POS Landeskog!
i hate the avalanche. i cant say why specifically. maybe its their annoying PA guy. maybe its because they should be in quebec? who knows.
WIN.
Once E & L are playing better chemistry won't be an issue
It actually surprises a bit that Laine hasn’t been successful on a line with Bryan Little. I used to see Little as such a valuable and versatile player that you would think he would be great setting up Laine for offensive chances. Has Little slipped to such a degree or is Laine the problem right now in this case?
Or is it a simple matter of lack of chemistry between two very good players?
What does Little do to that line? The guy barely gets to touch the puck. This line change will be good for him.Not according to my eyes
What does Little do to that line? The guy barely gets to touch the puck. This line change will be good for him.
I still think it's a chemistry problem, not a performance problem.
Laine-Scheifele-WheelerDidn't he score a very important goal last game?
Who else would you have take second line C minutes? Nobody makes sense. The coach needs to make those two lines work. And right now that means playing E & L on another line
Laine-Scheifele-Wheeler
Ehlers-Little-Perreault
Connor-Roslo-Armia
Hendricks-Copp-Petan/whoever
You can also swap Laine & Ehlers or Perrault & Wheeler.
Damn that line up looks nice. So nice.
Jesus. Swap Perrault & Ehlers. You can also put Petan in the middle of Connor & Roslo and put Armia on the fourth line. And when Lowry comes back you can run Connor-Lowry-Roslo or something like that.Perrault has never played RW? Why start now. He's so good winning board battles on his strong side.
Roslovic is a C for the future but not right now
Jesus. Swap Perrault & Ehlers. You can also put Petan in the middle of Connor & Roslo and put Armia on the fourth line. And when Lowry comes back you can run Connor-Lowry-Roslo or something like that.
Maurice is just shuffling the chairs on Titanic at this point.
I don't mind the lines. It'll be interesting to see how they do. I just feel like we could get more out of everyone with what i suggested (well, at least the ones we're not getting everything out of right now)I liked what Ivsaw last game. I don't know why we can't give it another look.?i'm looking forward to seeing it tomorrow
Of coarse its petan. No real debate.Be interesting to see who goes when Tanev comes back.
I actually think this line might be okay. I had suggested it earlier in the year when Little seemed a bit sluggish and got pushed around a bit. I think they might surprise us. Laine and Ehlers have plenty of skill and Copp can drive play and get in on the D. He's also fast enough to open up space. He's not bad in terms of reads and vision, either.Ehlers - Copp - Laine just sounds dysfunctional.
This probably means that the top 6 will share the toughest matchups, no?
Jesus. Swap Perrault & Ehlers. You can also put Petan in the middle of Connor & Roslo and put Armia on the fourth line. And when Lowry comes back you can run Connor-Lowry-Roslo or something like that.
Maurice is just shuffling the chairs on Titanic at this point.
What?The "Titanic" that has gone 6-2-2 in the last 10 games, and 2-0-1 against Division leaders (TB, WASH and VGK) on this home stand?
You mean this Titanic?
"Shuffling deck chairs on the Titanic" is an idiom that refers to making minor changes in a disastrous situation. Is that what you meant?What?
So, if we win and we see ELL, you won't be happy?If Jets win and we don`t see ELL I`m happy. Oh, and no more injuries!
Well, lets say at this point I will be happy if there will be no more injuries. That with a win - Great. Add "no ELL" to those - Awesome!So, if we win and we see ELL, you won't be happy?