I think Laine will struggle initially in the NHL due to his subpar skating. He will be closed down alot quicker in the NHL due to the smaller rink
He can improve it. He just turned 18 and his skating isn't that bad.I think Laine will struggle initially in the NHL due to his subpar skating. He will be closed down alot quicker in the NHL due to the smaller rink
Would you rather a taller Joe Sakic or a taller but worse skating Kovalchuk? The answer seems easy....Sakic (I am saying this is these player's ceiling, not what they are guaranteed to be fwiw).
In all honesty Matthews' ceiling is both higher than Laine's, they both have equal offensive ceiling's and Matthews has a significantly better 2 way game (40 Goals + Over PPG and Selke defence >> 40-50 goals + Over PPG). Even if Laine were also a center Matthews would still be the better player and if Winnipeg had the 1st pick - They'd be taking Matthews.
And before any of you say anything, no, Laine's ceiling is not Ovechkin, he will never be Ovechkin, so just stop with that nonsense now.
He can improve it. He just turned 18 and his skating isn't that bad.
if Toronto miss laine their GM must be fired. Laine -moves like Jagr but shuts like Ovie beating almost all rookie scoring records
I understand that Finland has a terrible hockey program and it's rare to see good players come out of that country but come on.
So you're saying that Matthews will be the greatest two way center ever? Bergeron's defense while potting 40 goals a season like Tarasenko? Okay... [mod]
I think Laine will struggle initially in the NHL due to his subpar skating. He will be closed down alot quicker in the NHL due to the smaller rink
I can't imagine what the board would be like if the Leafs were picking 2nd. Leafs fans and Finns uniting to pump Laine's tires would have been impossible to survive.
His IQ is nice. But it's just not on the same level or even that close to AM.
AM's Hockey IQ is the highest of any prospect we've seen since Crosby, other than McDavid (Well, McDavid's offensive IQ is definitely better, it's better than anyone else's in the whole league, defensively AM's hockey IQ is better though).
People need to chill. Matthews will likely put up a great performance against Germany as well, because well.... it is Germany.
Even Germany, as crazy as it sounds, provides a higher competition than either Matthews or Laine have faced in their pro career. There are top line Euroleague players on the other side (along with Ehrhoffs, Draisatls and the old legends).
Same thing with Belarus. It was the highest competition they had yet faced in their career. That both are 3PPG against that level of competition is CRAZY (I don't count the Canada game for Matthews for this comparison for obvious reasons).
Here is Laine shift by shift in the playoffs. Also someone asked earlier, he had 9 PP goals in regular season and 5 in the playoffs.
His IQ is nice. But it's just not on the same level or even that close to AM.
AM's Hockey IQ is the highest of any prospect we've seen since Crosby, other than McDavid (Well, McDavid's offensive IQ is definitely better, it's better than anyone else's in the whole league, defensively AM's hockey IQ is better though).
Would you rather a taller Joe Sakic or a taller but worse skating Kovalchuk? The answer seems easy....Sakic (I am saying this is these player's ceiling, not what they are guaranteed to be fwiw).
In all honesty Matthews' ceiling is both higher than Laine's, they both have equal offensive ceiling's and Matthews has a significantly better 2 way game (40 Goals + Over PPG and Selke defence >> 40-50 goals + Over PPG). Even if Laine were also a center Matthews would still be the better player and if Winnipeg had the 1st pick - They'd be taking Matthews.
And before any of you say anything, no, Laine's ceiling is not Ovechkin, he will never be Ovechkin, so just stop with that nonsense now.
Yup good luck with your 50 point #1 center (not saying we are any better right now)
It's funny because around the 2013 draft, Mackinnon was said to be better than Barkov because he had more "raw talent" than Barkov regardless that Barkov was more of a complete player and still is... and now Matthews is better than Laine because he's a more of complete player, regardless how much more "raw talent" Laine has.
Fail... none of those are from the recent game against Belarus. Also he looks slow and useless when he's not in the offensive zone.
I read comments from Finns complaining about North American bias and US posters being biased in their praise of Mathews, yet some of the same posters don't see they are doing the exact same thing now.