MartyOwns
thank you shero
- Apr 1, 2007
- 24,263
- 18,145
Based on what?
probably a combination of his pedestrian season and our track record of rushing prospects (the latter we have gotten better at)
Based on what?
Maybe Holtz wanted the contract this way? I don’t know if there is some arcane financial benefit to him somehow overall. (I don’t know what it is, a player gets the same three signing bonuses no matter if their contract slides or not.)
I guess he doesn’t need the money, we did learn that. Most kids don’t turn down a chance to pocket the signing bonus immediately. (Unless he gets the signing bonus now anyway? Speculating about NHL contracts make my head hurt.) [edit: Thinking about it, the ELC starts in 2021-22, so he’ll presumably get his signing bonus for that season when everyone else does.]
Maybe the team didn’t want the pressure of throwing him in the NHL so they made it an impossibility?
These are the best guesses I got and I admit they aren’t great.
Raymond and Holloway both also signed recently for contracts that begin in 21-22. Edmonton may have cap issues this season but Detroit doesn't so maybe it's just a thing NHL teams did this year. Signing bonuses are subject to escrow so maybe the agents thought it'd be best to wait till next season?
It would be good if he scores goals in the A.
All while being on a better team. I think it's more so the streaky nature of Holtz season.Lucas Raymond basically has the same year as Holtz does and Raymond seems to be getting a big push while people are down on Holtz? Makes no sense.
If you don’t need the money then not losing a big chunk of it to escrow is a thing. Escrow is 20% this season, the highest it’s ever been and none of it will be refunded since the revenue is obviously not there. (Plus 10% of the players’ money after escrow is being held back and will be paid back, interest free, in installments later in 2022.)It makes sense that this would result in more money, maybe, but given time value of money I would think you would still want the bonus in hand now. The scenarios where the Devils are capped out in Holtz's 3rd NHL season are remote but that ELC slide discount can be helpful.
Nice. Plenty of time to get his feet wet.
I was against Ty playing his last year down in juniors, but I was fine with it for the first two years (when he won awards, so clearly worth it)If an extra year in juniors helped produce the Ty Smith we're seeing now, I think a lap around the A can't hurt Holtz either.
Somebody get this kid a barber. The Adam Banks look is so 1994.
I was against Ty playing his last year down in juniors, but I was fine with it for the first two years (when he won awards, so clearly worth it)
however I think his final season in The juniors robbed him of some earlier production and opportunity to get used to the NHL pace. Such as we saw with Jack (his gap control and spacing is insanely better from 18 to 19).
Ty still gets caught sometimes, especially when pivoting or crossing over, and its simply due to pacing issues. Though I dont think hes a high enough level of skater To be as good in transitional defense as id like him to be,l
I had included his draft year when typing that; does sound pretty funny though lolI mean if you were fine with Smith playing the two seasons after being drafted in juniors then you should be happy, that's all he played lol. It was those two seasons and now this year.
Ive noticed a common theme among Devils fans (and some analysts) on various websites that people have Mercer above Holtz; Im curious if that is simply due to Dawson's improved production and Alexander's lack of production?
if this isnt the place to be asking this then my bad
You've never heard the dirty jerz before?I have never once in my life said or heard anyone say "Jerz" until now.
I may be on the outskirts of the common thought then.Mercer got a bit boosted by a good WJC and a strong D+1 in the Q, but I think most of us feel like it was always close between them, and it's still close. They each have their own strengths.
I think it might be.You've never heard the dirty jerz before?
Is it a Taylor Ham sort of situation (ie regional)?
ponytail routeHe should go the complete opposite route of that and just let it grow
I think it might be, I search the term and it's a Northern Jersey thing.You've never heard the dirty jerz before?
Is it a Taylor Ham sort of situation (ie regional)?
I think NJersey's record with highly touted Swedes that were 1st rounders is not good at all!!! Tedenby,Bergfors and Josefson should ring a bell. They need to keep Holtz in Sweden for another 2 years and quite believing that the AHL is a great developmental league it isn't,its pure garbage for the most part and not great for 18,19,20 year old youngsters needing a tonne of ice timeIf an extra year in juniors helped produce the Ty Smith we're seeing now, I think a lap around the A can't hurt Holtz either.
I think NJersey's record with highly touted Swedes that were 1st rounders is not good at all!!! Tedenby,Bergfors and Josefson should ring a bell. They need to keep Holtz in Sweden for another 2 years and quite believing that the AHL is a great developmental league it isn't,its pure garbage for the most part and not great for 18,19,20 year old youngsters needing a tonne of ice time